The double standards of feminism

So first of all, I would say this shows double standards in society, rather than double standards in feminism, because actually true feminism should work both ways, creating an equal playing field for both genders. This is what movements like 'He for She' advocate for- not only for men to stand up for women but for women to stand up for men (if you look at their campaigns, this is clearly one of their main focuses, regardless of the image of an angry shouting feminazi that the name feminism may conjure up).
However, this definitely shows an imbalance in society because this is sexism, clear as that. Statistically, more men are criminals, but that should certainly not be an excuse to assume that every man is in a situation like this. We have to accept that women can also do bad things.
It's the double standards in society rather than the double standards in feminism (which there shouldn't be- no one is a true feminist unless they advocate for men's rights as well as women's, although there are certainly more problem that women face than men), which need to be addressed, so instances like this are much less common.

Okay, rant over

Here's one from intersectional feminism

I tried to follow that narrative, I really did.

Ok?

Honestly, even though I despise modern feminism, I think this positive bias towards women predates that, and it is grounded in the view that women are both more valuable than men and have less agency than them, and the corresponding wish/impulse of both men and other women to "protect" them. "True" feminism would indeed want to fight against this; instead, it heavily capitalises on and exploits it. There is also the fact that men are just physically more dangerous than women; if a woman decides she wants to start attacking a man, he's probably not going to get seriously hurt/can fight her off. If a man is displaying any sort of aggression towards a woman, alarm bells go off for people because if he starts anything she is likely in more danger. (well, in a place with loads of glass, this is less accurate, but oh well..)

Yea. Exactly lol So I'm thinking this weekend go back with my friend who got kicked out (for nothing) and try and reason with the owner by bringing up that he actually didnt do anything, he's just got a big body or she's unusually small. The true sexism would be if he doesn't let him back. But I do think it's a flaw in feminism because it's like some people were saying "that's how you treat women? You don't make a woman feel scared like that," blah blah bah

and it's like ok sure, don't yell or whatever, the socially acceptable thing to say while it's one-sided, but erm what about what she did, which was actually worse?

Yeah I know what you mean, though I do still think it's more about sexism rather than feminism, because people have been conditioned to think it's wrong to do anything to a woman but fine if it's a man (just don't be mean to anyone I say ). The roots of this probably go back further than feminism, to when women were seen as the possession of a man and thus the weaker sex- therefore, there has always been this mindset that women are like delicate little flowers, so don't even touch them. This is clearly ridiculous
But yeah, I think you should go for it, especially if you've got multiple witnesses, as your friend doesn't have much to lose. However, try not to get into an argument, as this could work against your friend ('he clearly hurt a woman because, I mean, look at that short temper)

1st off, what? Positive bias?
Secondly, erm she threw a glass with all her might and it nearly landed, and glass is deadly
Third he wasn't aggressive. At all. I specified he was calm as day.

Erm, yes, positive bias...they are clearly biased in the woman's favour
Yes, often the actuality of a situation takes a backseat to people's prejudices (people think "men are stronger -> men trying to hurt women worse than vice versa", even though when glass is involved it hardly matters, it's going to hurt..)
Vaguely threatening, then. I highly doubt he would have done anything and you seem to perhaps be under the impression I am not on the guy's side. I very much am, these biases are ridiculous. I am just hesitant as to how much we can blame on feminism

You were rationalising the opposing view from mine so yea I would assume you're not on my side lol

Oh **** me exactly emily! lol
I'm struggling to word it like...people overestimate blokes because they're "big and strong" or whatever, and automatically presume them as threats you know? Is that not wrong? Did I miss something? He's being calm as a flower and she's throwing **** swearing tryna jump over people holding her back, refusing to shut the **** up, and he is calmly advising she goes home because she's blathered and in the end, he gets literally dragged out -__-

I wasn't rationalising the view, I was rationalising the behaviour. Trying to understand why people act in such a moronic and sexist manner.
(and perhaps rationalising is the incorrect word even for that, as it implies they may be justified; simply "trying to explain" would do)

Rationalising is the proper word though it's an assumption, it's not incorrectly used in context, as you just said you're rationalising.