France "must learn to live with terrorism" -French Prime Minister

The problem is we'll never have a world or even countries of highly educated people. Even in Sweden where they practised eugenics to stop the stupid from breeding they face massive issues there. Liberal tolerance of intolerant ideologies is the main problem.

What next? Women must learn to live with being raped by horny economic migrants?

Then I suppose humanity is forever doomed.
Humans... if you don't try and mould them into nice things - appear to naturally... love to destroy and kill shite.
Seems the highly developed countries are becoming highly educated, with the increasing focus on university education (what is it now, increasing to approx a third of population or something? Negatives to this sure in terms of employment, but it does great for society).

Also the countries with more Muslims than the others. Poland and Romania, for example, have very few.

Sorry to break this to you, but he is right, you do appear to be a terrorism apologist / enabler.

Personally I think it's bloody obvious that humanity is forever doomed.

You only have to spend a minute trying to imagine what kind of weapons would be available to people in 1000 years from now and/or what kind of police states there'd need to be to try to deal with them.

Then assume Islam is still going strong,the population is 40 billion,water shortages ,housing shortages,powerful viruses etc etc.

As long as wealth becomes more evenly distributed, and the corruption ends all will be well.
I think there will likely be considerable limits on weaponry at least in size, so destructive power available to the individual shouldn't be an issue.
I think Islam like all the other religions will decline considerably, as quality of life and education improves.

Irrelevant - IS will naturally target those who oppose them more, just like the IRA used to target public servants like the police, because they posed a bigger threat.

What you need is a well organised intelligence service - it's why the UK suffers less attacks than France; because France's domestic intelligence service is a shambles

With that kind of weak and disgusting attitude no wonder he got booed at the memorial service today.

How can it decline with many in Islamic nations like Saudi Arabia mainly being taught about the teachings of Islam?

Irrelevant - IS will naturally target those who oppose them more, just like the IRA used to target public servants like the police, because they posed a bigger threat.



Far from it - I just don't see that kicking a wasps nest then posturing at it is the best way to deal with wasps. If you want to tackle terrorism then criminalising anyone from the same religious or racial background is the wrong way to go about it - dividing society even more just opens up more avenues for radicalisation. What you need is a well organised intelligence service - it's why the UK suffers less attacks than France; because France's domestic intelligence service is a shambles; in conjunction with an accepting society that isn't set up to drive young kids into the arms of groups like Isis but an environment where the Muslim community feels comfortable self policing and reporting any rogue imams or worshippers.

Posted from TSR Mobile

They seek the weakest link in the chain. Currently it is France therefore they target France.


Wait until Muslim population in Britain reaches 10% (as in France).

Anybody who talks about diving societies et is part of the problem. What is needed is hard action, not a load of empty talk.

The fact of the matter is that several decades ago, people similar to me warned that this kind of thing would happen, and people similar to yourself said that it would not. People similar to me, were sadly correct, and we have the solutions.

What is needed is a firm hand, usage of harsh punishments, strict immigration and deportations amongst a few other things.

If trying to avoid creating even more radicals through poorly thought-out, rash actions designed to look tough is part of the problem, then I'd rather be part of the problem, because your solution seems to be to make everything a hell of a lot worse - creating even more terrorists is quite obviously not a good thing and given the choice between a slow but measured approach that, while it doesn't get rid of them immediately doesn't create more, and turning them into the Hydra from Hercules (kill one, create two), the former is self-evidently the right move.

You have no evidence to back up your claims, name me one terrorist that was created as a result of him or her being deported from somewhere.

The liberals have caused this problem, it is lunacy to believe that the liberals can also fix it.

I didn't say deported, but raiding mosques and treating someone as automatically a suspect and guilty until proven innocent is going to drive people into the arms of the terrorists. As for evidence - while I'm no sociologist or in a position to properly evaluate their methodology: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/095465590944578 seems to suggest that social tensions are a significant predictor of terrorism.

Wouldn't call the likes of Bush and Blair liberals tbh - and their power-mongering and destabilisation of the middle east is ultimately what gave ISIS the space to grow.

What next? Women must learn to live with being raped by horny economic migrants?

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-07-15/french-pm-france-is-at-war-with-terrorists/

"Times have changed and we should learn to live with terrorism. We have to show solidarity and collective calm. France has been hit in its soul on the 14 July, our national day."

How can this guy be fucxing serious??

Has he just handed the country over to Front Nationale?