Other European countries should do this too including UK. Is is up to us if we let our countries get turned into 3rd world countries merged with the Middle East
Other European countries should do this too including UK. Is is up to us if we let our countries get turned into 3rd world countries merged with the Middle East
Unfortunately, most conservatives who oppose mass migration don't have the same amount of time on their hands as trendy workless liberals from Goldsmith.
Unfortunately, most conservatives who oppose mass migration don't have the same amount of time on their hands as trendy workless liberals from Goldsmith.
The contrast in opinions does tend to correlate with location, London/cities with better job markets which have seen benefit from migrants, vs northern towns with less economic stability job prospects who don't benefit as much from migration, mass migration anyway.
The contrast in opinions does tend to correlate with location, London/cities with better job markets which have seen benefit from migrants, vs northern towns with less economic stability job prospects who don't benefit as much from migration, mass migration anyway.
What a great idea, shove them all in London. I never plan to live there anyway.
Who cares about them? If they wish to destroy their own countries then let them. The EU disaster is coming to an end soon regardless.
I like traveling in Europe, the cities culture/history/architecture are dope, I'd hate to see it destroyed (yes that is an exaggeration but that is my reasoning for caring), Also I believe trading with EU nations post Brexit isn't out of the question and may be pivotal in Britain's economic stability going ahead (I have limited knowledge In this area so feel free to educate me if I'm wrong). I don't think unrest in Europe is good for anyone really.
Other European countries should do this too including UK. Is is up to us if we let our countries get turned into 3rd world countries merged with the Middle East
Technically under German law those protesters are now Hate criminals.
You give the OP far too muich credit. He is basically xenophobic and anti muslim fro hos pevious posyings, backed up by the Daily Express. He doesnt understand the difference between a migrant, an asylum seeker and a refugee.
You give the OP far too muich credit. He is basically xenophobic and anti muslim fro hos pevious posyings, backed up by the Daily Express. He doesnt understand the difference between a migrant, an asylum seeker and a refugee.
a) Throwing labels around without justification doesn't make you any smarter b) When a chunk of the migrants aren't genuine refugees, thats understandable c) With all the attacks in the past two weeks, and the rise in sex crimes since the migrants arrived, why should we bother to draw distinctions?
a) Throwing labels around without justification doesn't make you any smarter b) When a chunk of the migrants aren't genuine refugees, thats understandable c) With all the attacks in the past two weeks, and the rise in sex crimes since the migrants arrived, why should we bother to draw distinctions?
They have different meanings and refer to different groups of people. using them interchangably just illustrated he doesnt understand the difference. Its always a good start if you wnat to discuss the ossies, to know who you are referring to ratehr than being out by a factor of 100. You carry on though.
They have different meanings and refer to different groups of people. using them interchangably just illustrated he doesnt understand the difference. Its always a good start if you wnat to discuss the ossies, to know who you are referring to ratehr than being out by a factor of 100. You carry on though.
Refugees are a type of migrant though, there's nothing wrong with using a catch-all phrase, especially when we've already established a good number aren't genuine refugees.
Refugees are a type of migrant though, there's nothing wrong with using a catch-all phrase, especially when we've already established a good number aren't genuine refugees.
So what are you complaining about? Refugees or migrants?
The OP is a person who doesnt understand that what refugees we take is giverned by international agreements and not the EU. Uts all been explained to him several times, but he just wont accept it.
If you want to start debate on antionality and immgration law, then feel free, except im off out. At least know what you are talking about in terms of the basic law though.
If you wnat to use the phrase migrant as meaning refugee then its rather clumsy at best because regugees may be migrants but not all migrants are refugees. Its the same sort of nonsense with people referring to muslims as terrorists. Just be accurate or choose to be ignorant.