The I-SOC (Islamic Society) XIII

By Alhus Sunnah Wal Jamaah do you mean Barelvi?

Yep.

It is. It's a legitimate Muslim website



Posted from TSR Mobile

So basically, you're a terrorist sympathiser. Good to know.

Send Zamestaneh your CV. I heard he's a matchmaker..

Muhammad Ilyas Qadri and Sarfraz Ahmed Naeemi are two names that come to mind. Study the Jamaat Ahle Sunnat for more guidance.

Thank you for your accurately inaccurate statement Did you have an old account on TSR? You remind me of someone

I am saying that we collectively try to hold traditional Sunni views close to the first generations; some of us may have different views on some fiqh issues but we do not state that IslamQA is an invalid authority on fiqh, even if not everyone takes from it.

1. I do not know if they classify as Muslims or not, but at the very least they are extremely sinful and astray. In any case, they have made takfir on so many people that chances are that in many cases it would backfire on themselves, but Allah knows best whether the individuals that make up ISIS are Muslim; I have not read into any scholarly opinions on the actual issue of whether they are Muslim or not other than to say they are astray.
2. I do not know what a Khattam is (I don't think I have ever done it), so could you briefly explain what it is please.
3. Women in the work place is a broad topic covering many different things and therefore things have to be understood on a case by case basis. I am not specifically sure what you want to know because even asking 'can women work?' is not specific enough.

Barelvis try so hard to stick the Ahle Sunnah label to themselves and get offended when someone calls them barelvis,
a) a barelvi is exactly that, a barelvi
b) the vast majority of Ahle Sunnah are not barelvis and have probably never heard of Ahmed Raza Khan

So lets stick to calling a spade a spade, barelvis or sufis are the term which you should use.

This is so inaccurate I don't even know where to start.

What part is inaccurate? Barelvis are a desi thing, they dont exist anywhere else.

1. Ok. That's fair enough, and probably the correct answer.
2. A Khattam is basically a gathering held, an imam attends, food is placed forward usually and a dua is made. Can be and is held on many occassions, a death in the family or the anniversary of a death, moving into a new house, a birth in the family etc.
3. This was a troll question but I may as well get your actual opinion, I will re-word my question to ''can women work in the modern-day western workplace where interaction with males is common and unavoidable?''

Send Zamestaneh your CV. I heard he's a matchmaker..

So basically, you're a terrorist sympathiser. Good to know.

Hm, okay. I do not wish to get into branding each other, but do you have a valid reason why I am a 'terrorist sympathiser'?

2. I am unsure but it seems there isn't anything wrong with it, but I haven't come across it personally; it might perhaps be wrong if it becomes a regular thing, but this is just me assessing without having read a specific fatwa on the matter.
3. From my understanding of what I have read, it is advised that if a woman doesn't have to get a job, then she shouldn't, but if she does work, this ought to be in a primarily female environment e.g. teaching girls etc. If it is the case where getting a job is a necessity to help provide for the family, and she is unable to get a job in a female only enviroment, then perhaps it is fine for her to work generally, though she should still try to moderate her interaction. As I said: it should be assessed on a case by case basis. If a woman chooses to get a job in a mixed environment when there is no need for her to work, then that is not advised; I cannot judge whether it is outright haram or not as I am not a scholar to issue fatwas.

For clarification:
ISIS are not Salafi. They diametrically appose the Salafi madhab and rather have a madhab of the Khawarij. They have been spoken against and refuted by various Salafi scholars such as Sheikh Saalih Al Fawzaan, Sheikh Abdul aziz muhammad Aali Ash Sheikh and others.

[video="youtube;5331IXpoVwE"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5331IXpoVwE[/video]


p.s. if this is guy is Ahlul Sunnah im lost:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ITS5c5EqoM

Just the fact that IslamQA is generally known for being a terrorist sympathiser site at times .

It really isn't generally known for that.

Gingerbeardmansite - you visit some interesting sites brother.

Except it is. Their constant equating of everything to be bid'ah and shirk only fuels extremist ideology.

Brothers and Sisters I advise you to stay away from discussions that contain no benefit. And rather spend the time concentrating on ones self by seeking beneficial knowledge by which one will improve ones relationship with Allah and help others do the same.

The Messenger of Allah said:

"Ask Allah for beneficial knowledge and seek refuge with Allah from knowledge that is of no benefit."

Sunan Ibn Majah 3843 - Hasan

I advise everyone to start their journey now in seeking knowledge.

A very beneficial book on the Etiquettes of seeking knowledge:

https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/single/en_The_Etiquette_of_Seeking_Knowledge.pdf

It isn't.

They don't equate everything to bid'ah and shirk. The sad truth is that certain groups in the Indian subcontinent (we'll stick to that part of the world for now) are neck deep in bid'ah or shirk (or both). You only have to do a simple youtube search to see the reality. When someone refutes or speaks against certain group's actions, it isn't extremist ideology, they are simply making people aware of the bad.

I'm ex-barevli. I've attacked salafis in the past like you're doing right now. And like my accusations were baseless, your accusations are also baseless and mostly based on emotion.