Ehhh... I'm kinda with the anti-Trump brigade on this one

Why should all of us non plane hijackers be screened at airports? Because there is no magic solution to routing out and identifying would be hijackers.

This happens in numerous circumstances - The minority ruin it for the majority. Is it fair? No - Is it reasonable yes

I dont have the time to address the second part but there have been numerous ideas put about. I might even argue that the illusion of recognising and dealing with the issues robustly is as important. People are sick of being condescended to by politicians, the media and "moderate" muslims about Islam

It would be so refreshing and reassuring for a leader to talk about the reality of Islam and its problems instead of carefully reading from a sensitively worded script. It wouldnt magically make any problems disappear but it would make people a lot happier that they are not being led by a blind, appeasing coward who fails to understand the link between the two

You realise you're not being screened because you might hijack the plane? Getting into a planes cockpit in the western world is virtually impossible without inside help.

I don't see how having to go through a metal detector is 'ruining' anything?

That translates into 'I have no idea what the solution is'. What issues are you talking about specifically? You do realise 'moderate' Muslims are the overwhelming majority?

I bet that wouldn't alienate people and exacerbate the problems, good plan.

Tomatoe Tomato. Desperate much?

You dont think Airport security has a negative effect on your experience?

Wow yes you got me! You win this one

People are being alienated .. the majority non muslim populations are sick of living in terror, being blown up and being condescended too lying media and politicians

Enjoy Trump and the Europes far right rising pal

Someone else actually made a much better point against this than me about how that's non-discriminatory unlike the plan to ban all Muslims.

None whatsoever, it just means I have to get up a little bit earlier when I fly. Besides even if aviation wasn't a terrorist target there'd still be security checks.

You had enough time to type two paragraphs but not actually offer a solution, seems very suspicious.

How do you alienate a large majority of the population? I think you need to pick a different word.

Anyone who lives in terror of being blown up, in the UK, is an idiot. I don't know anyone who lives in terror of being killed by a bee or a dog yet both are more likely.

Can you give an example of a condescending quote,that is also a lie, from a politician on the subject of Islam please.

Sorry my friend, banning men from childrens parks is discriminatory... is it fair? No .. is it reasonable yes

You seem to want a perfect solution, there isnt one like with many things. You must choose.

lol Thats great and i am happy for you but your are the 1% (See the theme yet?)

Yes i dont have the will, time or capacity to type out a long in depth post at this moment. Suspicious of what??

How would you react if you heard someone shout allahu ackbar in the street? (Try to answer honestly)

Lets do a simple test to see if you believe what you say is true. Draw a picture of Mohammed, post it to your twitter and facebook followers (Ensuring your name and picture are there) Should be easy given nobody is in fear or silence

"Islam is a religion of peace" (Every western leader)

[video="youtube;w_hk95zRngY"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_hk95zRngY[/video]

Your points are laughable. 'Men' aren't banned from children's parks, convicted sex offenders are. See the difference? People who have proven in the past they are capable and have the desire to do bad things, the overwhelming majority of Muslims don't fit this.

The most ridiculous part of this suggestion (other than the fact it would never happen even if Trump wins) is the fact that it doesn't work at all. How do you know someone is a Muslim? What's to stop people lying?



So I take it you've conducted extensive research on this? Done some surveys?



I'd agree you don't have the capacity. Suspicious that you too know there is no solution so instead of admitting defeat you claimed you couldn't be bothered.



Well if it was a suicide bomber the bomb probably would have gone off before I had a chance to really react but in all honesty I'd probably think it was some moron playing a stupid joke. You're also changing the situation. People in the UK don't experience that hence why on a daily basis they have no reason to live in terror of being blown up.



As far as memory serves I only have about two Muslims friends on Facebook and I don't use Twitter so I doubt there'd be much backlash. While we're on that topic I wonder how Christians would feel if I drew a mocking picture of Jesus...



And the vast majority of people who follow Islam are perfectly peaceful people so I don't see how that's a lie.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Enjoy trumps coronation little fella, i will be here to lick up your salty aplopetic confused tears

Haha run out of nonsensical arguments? Don't worry, I won't cry too much there's no way these ridiculous racist policies will ever come to fruition


Posted from TSR Mobile

I know a fruitless lost cause when i see one. There is nothing i could type in response to your last post that you would not churlishly dismiss

I know a fruitless lost cause when i see one. There is nothing i could type in response to your last post that you would not churlishly dismiss

And the vast majority of people who follow Islam are perfectly peaceful people so I don't see how that's a lie.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Funny how you guys always going on about making sure to make a distinction between Islam and its followers when it comes to criticising it. And yet, here you are, equating Islam with it's followers. Islam, as in the religious ideology, is not a peaceful religion. The Qur'an and the Hadiths contain huge amounts of violence, and calls to violence. The term 'religion of peace' is a neologism that was invented after 9/11 by politicians. Feel free to look it up. It's nothing more than a meaningless platitude.

I've never made that distinction. The Bible also contains a lot of violent verses and stories yet people don't go round condemning Christians. I don't really care where that phrase originates from, the simple fact is the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peaceful people yet some people have convinced themselves that's not the case


Posted from TSR Mobile

Funny how you guys always going on about making sure to make a distinction between Islam and its followers when it comes to criticising it. And yet, here you are, equating Islam with it's followers. Islam, as in the religious ideology, is not a peaceful religion. The Qur'an and the Hadiths contain huge amounts of violence, and calls to violence. The term 'religion of peace' is a neologism that was invented after 9/11 by politicians. Feel free to look it up. It's nothing more than a meaningless platitude.

As does the Bible.
Yet I don't think all Christians are evil.

Whataboutery.

It's not whataboutery at all. It's asking for consistency.
Islam is not a religion of peace, no religion is. That doesn't mean innocent Muslims and Christians should be held culpable, responsible or punishable for the actions of a tiny amount of people.

Why do you assume that I don't dislike fundamentalist Christians as well?

Because 99.99% of your posts seem to be about Muslims.

Banning all Muslims for the actions of a tiny minority of people would be like banning all Americans because a tiny minority commit murder. Punishing innocent people for the actions of others, just because they happen to share a characteristic with them really is fascism.

You seem to hold every Muslim responsible for the atrocities committed by Islamic terrorists and it's an absurd and unhelpful position.

When a Christian fundamentalist shoots up an abortion clinic we don't hold every Christian responsible and nor should we.