Not only is this whataboutery, but if you think supporting executing murderers is the same as supporting killing adulterers or apostates there is something deeply, deeply wrong with you, as I can only assume that you must think that the acts of leaving Islam or having extramarital sex are similar in terribleness to first-degree murder. That is the only way that you could think that there is little difference in supporting the death penalty for any of these acts. If this is the case then you must be completely nuts, and there is very little point in me trying to reason with you.
Oh, so does that make supporting Sharia not worthy of criticism then?
Why does it matter if the women have answered similarly to the men? For the percentage of women who didn't answer similarly it must be pretty terrible.
EDIT:
@TercioOfParma,
@KimKallstrom,
@jake4198,
@The Roast,
@Dandaman1,
@Atlas Thugged come and see this. It's a regressive who thinks that supporting the death penalty for adulterers and apostates is no worse than supporting it for murderers. How regressive can the regressives get?