What a ridiculous assumption. It sounds more like you don't actually have any 'information' to back up your arguments. You're just throwing around buzzwords and adopting the typical victim-hood status.
You're right. It's seems to be much more prevelant outside of the West. As reported by the
Washington Post, predominantly white countries are the most racially tolerant countries in the world (particularly the UK):
How has this affected Black British people alive today? Are you honestly suggesting that the colonisation and imperialism that took place ~100-200 years ago directly afffects these people to this day? I just don't think that is a valid argument or excuse. Slavery was pretty much non-existent in the UK and the majority of black people that live here today (and/or their ancestors) would have came here voluntarily.
This isn't a thread to attack the black community. It's a thread to dispute the lies and manipulative statistics spread by the BLMUK movement. Once again, black people living in the UK are completely unaffected by colonisation and imperalism. I think it's a pretty absurd argument to make.
White people, clearly. White people that had nothing to do with the actions of their ancestors. Maybe it's the attitude of blaming others that is the problem. Maybe it's time for these people to actually take some responsibility for themselves.
You're free to make your own thread mate. You talk about inequality and police brutality but you're not using any facts or statistics to support these statements. These are pretty much non-arguments as far as I'm concerned.
Another non-argument.
Personally, I think that white privilege is non-existent in the UK. Please try and prove me otherwise. Can you explain to me why
white working class boys are the group least likely to attend university if they're so privileged?