Milo Yiannopoulos thoughts?

Scroll to see replies

Yeah, completely agree. Everyone who does not share your views is obviously a pathetic troll and an absolute loser. But his fans are even worse for being pathetic enough to follow this disgusting troll. I feel sad for them.

Spoiler

I don't think that any of them are pathetic or losers, trolls are actually a source of entertainment due to the (positive and negative) reactions they provoke by people who take them seriously :smile:

He even admitted to being one.

Reply 41

Galaxie501

Original post by WBZ144

He even admitted to being one.

It just sounded very condoscending. Thats all.

:eek3:

Reply 42

Razamataz666

Original post by Another

So apparently, he's a gay man who doesn't believe that lesbians exist

I agree that he's a professional troll!

he has some christian belief relationships require penile penetration and believes because lesbianic sex does not involve a penis, it is not a form of relationship and considers them deluded, like transexuals etc.

Reply 43

nellythumper

Original post by Razamataz666

So he cherry picks parts of the Bible? Typical.

Reply 44

nellythumper

Original post by Jeniecechantelle

Thanks, and oh I know. Unfortunately, society is plagued with these rad leftist "progressives", in which especially the minorities that are part of that cancerous agenda would (and have already) called me a "coon" and "uncle tom" for not complying with their views of #BLM being a "equality movement" and for me not denying that reverse racism exists. It's ironic, because I have a different opinion, I now find myself even more of a minority among the minorities. :' :wink:

Wait, what? How is blm a terrorist group? The leadership have condemned the splinter attacks by people on the fringes.

Reply 45

Joep95

Original post by Dom2375

He's a professional attention seeker and a dickhead who thinks being gay excuses him from being racist and sexist.

Can you point me to the racist and sexist comments?

Reply 46

Joep95

Original post by nellythumper

http://www.mediaite.com/online/in-2012-milo-yiannopoulos-argued-for-bolder-censure-and-the-banning-of-trolls-from-the-internet/

Here he suggests banning people from the internet.

This isn't directly relevant but he tweeted these screencaps which are fake. In my opinion that's libel.

https://tweetsave.com/nero/status/755256958828089344

So he thought something years ago but changed his opinion after he saw how it was implemented, is that not allowed?

Reply 47

Joep95

Original post by Wilfred Little

I like him a lot. He is very provocative but he admits it. The time he was on that question show (I forget what it was) with Kate Smurthwaite sums him up pretty well. He makes a good argument that is backed up then follows it with 'shut up now, men are talking' :biggrin:

Was that the big questions, where he kept getting interrupted when making his points and the host did nothing but jumped in to stop it when it happened to her?

Reply 48

Joep95

Original post by John55

I heard those were fake...

One tweet he had posted was fake (it is not known who created them)

The other tweets are legit and go straight to her Twitter page.

Reply 49

TercioOfParma

He has the most bants. He sometimes says outlandish things I disagree with though.

Reply 50

username2512877

Some interesting opinions which I very much agree with but mostly a stubborn, conceited bigot.

Reply 51

Jeniecechantelle

Original post by nellythumper

Wait, what? How is blm a terrorist group? The leadership have condemned the splinter attacks by people on the fringes.

I never said they were one in that comment..

Reply 52

nellythumper

Original post by Jeniecechantelle

I never said they were one in that comment..

Oh **** yeah, I must have read another comment and misquoted yours.

Reply 53

username1245326

used to watch him constantly because hes a logical and articulate guy but i havent bothered with him the past year - hes just become desperate for attention and delibereately says certain things in such a way just to be controversial, hes in it for himself and not for his beliefs

Reply 54

username917703

Original post by joecphillips

Was that the big questions, where he kept getting interrupted when making his points and the host did nothing but jumped in to stop it when it happened to her?

Yes, that's the one.

Kate Smurthwaite is abhorrent. Milo didn't interrupt them (the feminists), he let them have their say. But Milo speaks and they try to shut him down by shouting over him.

Reply 55

Trapz99

He's great, Very intelligent and well spoken. Even though I don't agree with him on everything, overall I agree with a lot of his views.

Reply 56

nellythumper

Original post by joecphillips

So he thought something years ago but changed his opinion after he saw how it was implemented, is that not allowed?

Of course it's allowed but I'm not sure his opinion has truly changed, I think he probably decided to jump on the bandwagon of the alt-right. I say this because he supports Trump a guy who has sued the Onion over a joke and did the same thing to Bill Maher which shows that Trump can't take a joke. Furthermore, Trump wants to 'open up the libel laws' in order to limit the freedom of the press so they don't criticise him as much. This guy pretty much borders fascist and yet Milo supports him.

Reply 57

Joep95

Original post by nellythumper

He wants to open it up when it comes to mendacious libel (knowingly lying), in America you can say almost anything about famous people and it is unlikely they can do anything about it, it is possibly the one piece of libel I agree should be opened up.

(edited 7 years ago)

Reply 58

BRONZEMEDAL1

Please somebody explain to a simpleton like me why Milo is worth listening to? I can't get past his campness and arrogance.

Reply 59

Joep95

Original post by BRONZEMEDAL1

Please somebody explain to a simpleton like me why Milo is worth listening to? I can't get past his campness and arrogance.

He isn't for everyone but some of what he says goes against the picture that is painted by the media but he backs it up with facts and figures, he himself admits he isn't for everyone or a academic on the subject he just tries to reach a different audience to the academics and get them questioning things.