Tort scenario 1- you should have:
Negligent misstatement resulting in economic loss
General negligence - specific reference to remoteness was the damage too remote? Probably not
Nervous shock (psych injury) - what did everyone conclude for this?
Private nuisance- Hamid can claim his friend cannot no legal interest in the land.. I think they were 3 factors of an unreasonable use of land (location,duration,public benefit)
Private nuisance- act of revenge amounts to a nuisance (Christine v Davey)
Rule in Rylands