The Student Room Group

Yet another example of complete Israeli brutality

https://www.facebook.com/TheIndependentOnline/videos/10153416318826636/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

But oh well, saying something against Israel means you are anti-semitic...

Scroll to see replies

Maybe if the stupid Palestinians would stop blowing themselves up, stabbing people, and launching rockets then the Israelis may be nice to them. Palestine deserves everything it gets.
Original post by TercioOfParma
Maybe if the stupid Palestinians would stop blowing themselves up, stabbing people, and launching rockets then the Israelis may be nice to them. Palestine deserves everything it gets.


Even abusing the disabled? That's pretty ****ed mate.
Original post by TercioOfParma
Maybe if the stupid Palestinians would stop blowing themselves up, stabbing people, and launching rockets then the Israelis may be nice to them. Palestine deserves everything it gets.


Maybe if the zionists never invaded in the first place, stealing the palestinians land, raping their women, sexually abusing and torturing children, abusing human rights, demolishing their homes to create settlements that are illegal under international law, dropping bombs on MSF hospitals and UN backed schools, tear gassing children whilst they're going to school, cutting off water and food supplies, blocking international aid, not allowing fishermans to fish to feed their families. Raiding homes to take pictures of their children and take them to prison the next day. What about all of the gaza strip obliberated by israeli airstrikes. Remember, Hamas didn't exist until israel started their ethinic cleansing of palestinians because apparantly "god promised them the land."
Original post by inhuman
https://www.facebook.com/TheIndependentOnline/videos/10153416318826636/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

But oh well, saying something against Israel means you are anti-semitic...


This Israeli-Palestine conflict dates back to the end of the Great War. Essentially, Britain and France promised the Arabs that they would get their independence from the Ottoman Empire of they helped them topple the Ottomans themselves. The Arabs agreed, and the Ottomans were disposed of and The Great War was won. However, Britan and France negotiated the land mass that each of them would obtain as a result of defeating the Ottomans and hence took the land that the Arabs would take up for their independence and cooperation. They still allowed the Arabs to live there, but they still essentially controlled the country. This country was Palestine(at this point it consisted of Israel today, and the Gaza Strip). There were prominent Zionists in London who acted as a catalyst for immigration of Jews into Palestine, and Britian agreed, allowing Jews to enter Palestine. The Muslim Arabs hated this, and killed many of them. The Jews wanted to co-exist peacefully, but the Arabs really wouldn't have it. Tension existed in this country for decades, and it turned into the Jews favour, due to the sympathy gained after WW2. Many major countries supported the Zionist ideology and hence supported the mass immigration of more Jews into Palestine. At this point, Palestine was split into Arab and Jew zones, but as a result of the Arab intolererance, the Jews eventually took up most of Palestine, re-named it to Israel, and then defended it against the Palestinians and other Arab countries for decades.

I think the blame rests on Britan, France and the Palestinians themselves. Britain and France essentially scammed the Arabs, while the Palestinians killed Jews that wanted to co-exist.
Original post by GradeA*UnderA
This Israeli-Palestine conflict dates back to the end of the Great War. Essentially, Britain and France promised the Arabs that they would get their independence from the Ottoman Empire of they helped them topple the Ottomans themselves. The Arabs agreed, and the Ottomans were disposed of and The Great War was won. However, Britan and France negotiated the land mass that each of them would obtain as a result of defeating the Ottomans and hence took the land that the Arabs would take up for their independence and cooperation. They still allowed the Arabs to live there, but they still essentially controlled the country. This country was Palestine(at this point it consisted of Israel today, and the Gaza Strip). There were prominent Zionists in London who acted as a catalyst for immigration of Jews into Palestine, and Britian agreed, allowing Jews to enter Palestine. The Muslim Arabs hated this, and killed many of them. The Jews wanted to co-exist peacefully, but the Arabs really wouldn't have it. Tension existed in this country for decades, and it turned into the Jews favour, due to the sympathy gained after WW2. Many major countries supported the Zionist ideology and hence supported the mass immigration of more Jews into Palestine. At this point, Palestine was split into Arab and Jew zones, but as a result of the Arab intolererance, the Jews eventually took up most of Palestine, re-named it to Israel, and then defended it against the Palestinians and other Arab countries for decades.

I think the blame rests on Britan, France and the Palestinians themselves. Britain and France essentially scammed the Arabs, while the Palestinians killed Jews that wanted to co-exist.


You didn't mention the promised land. It's not casual immigration. The jews need to build a temple on the temple mount to fuflil the prophecy. But they'd need to destroy the dome of the rock in its way first.
Original post by riyadhussain123
Maybe if the zionists never invaded in the first place, stealing the palestinians land, raping their women, sexually abusing and torturing children, abusing human rights, demolishing their homes to create settlements that are illegal under international law, dropping bombs on MSF hospitals and UN backed schools, tear gassing children whilst they're going to school, cutting off water and food supplies, blocking international aid, not allowing fishermans to fish to feed their families. Raiding homes to take pictures of their children and take them to prison the next day. What about all of the gaza strip obliberated by israeli airstrikes. Remember, Hamas didn't exist until israel started their ethinic cleansing of palestinians because apparantly "god promised them the land."


If there is an ethnic cleansing going on, how come both Gaza and Palestine have higher growth rates than Israel itself?

You think that Palestinians haven't done the same thing? The only difference is that Palestine is a technological backwater so it gets oppression points.
Reply 7
Original post by riyadhussain123
Maybe if the zionists never invaded in the first place


The Arabs rejected the original 1947 UN partition plan and went to war to destroy the Israelis.

The Arabs lost, the Israelis now after 80 years of defending themselves have the land. (and even gave large chunks of it back after the 1967 war to resume peace)

Israel is not going anywhere, there are plenty other backwards Middle eastern states for the arabs to move to if they don't like living in Israel. But I think you will find most would rather continue to live and work there, and considering 20% of Israel (not Gaza or the west bank) are arabs and still do, I struggle to see any "mass rape, genocide and murder" against them taking place.
Original post by champ_mc99
Even abusing the disabled? That's pretty ****ed mate.


Such is life. The Palestinians would probably do the same if not worse if they ever got to opportunity.
Reply 9
Original post by champ_mc99
Even abusing the disabled? That's pretty ****ed mate.

The man was asked politely to leave. He refused. Then he was asked to leave less politely.. :cool:
Original post by admonit
The man was asked politely to leave. He refused. Then he was asked to leave less politely.. :cool:


there's a lesson there somewhere
Original post by TercioOfParma
If there is an ethnic cleansing going on, how come both Gaza and Palestine have higher growth rates than Israel itself?

You think that Palestinians haven't done the same thing? The only difference is that Palestine is a technological backwater so it gets oppression points.


You're wasting your time. Rabid anti-Semites don't deal in facts and logic, only Hamas nonsense.
Original post by TercioOfParma
Such is life. The Palestinians would probably do the same if not worse if they ever got to opportunity.


Make no mistake about it, if given the chance Hamas (who they voted in) would kill every Jew on the planet*
Reply 13
Original post by GradeA*UnderA


I think the blame rests on Britan, France and the Palestinians themselves. Britain and France essentially scammed the Arabs, while the Palestinians killed Jews that wanted to co-exist.


No no no, don't get yourself out of it. The blame rests solely on the British.

But that has no bearing on how Israel treats Palestine.

You can look at my post history and see that I have no love lost for Islam. It is not like I am biased against Israel here for anything. Neither do I deny that some of the things they must do, they must do for protection.

However, that does not mean they should do, or are given a free pass, for atrocities like these.
Reply 14
Original post by remiremi
The Arabs rejected the original 1947 UN partition plan and went to war to destroy the Israelis.

The Arabs lost, the Israelis now after 80 years of defending themselves have the land. (and even gave large chunks of it back after the 1967 war to resume peace)

Israel is not going anywhere, there are plenty other backwards Middle eastern states for the arabs to move to if they don't like living in Israel. But I think you will find most would rather continue to live and work there, and considering 20% of Israel (not Gaza or the west bank) are arabs and still do, I struggle to see any "mass rape, genocide and murder" against them taking place.


A plan made as a reparation for the holocaust. Of course they didn't accept it. Would you have accepted it? And so what, because Israel then also won militarily, it means they are in the right and the Palestinians wrong? That it gives them the right to indiscriminately abuse the disabled as here, or kill people in the name of safety?
Reply 15
Original post by admonit
The man was asked politely to leave. He refused. Then he was asked to leave less politely.. :cool:


Because he can leave when thrown over in his wheelchair?

Retardedness brought to a whole other level.
Original post by riyadhussain123
Maybe if the zionists never invaded in the first place, stealing the palestinians land, raping their women, sexually abusing and torturing children, abusing human rights, demolishing their homes to create settlements that are illegal under international law, dropping bombs on MSF hospitals and UN backed schools, tear gassing children whilst they're going to school, cutting off water and food supplies, blocking international aid, not allowing fishermans to fish to feed their families. Raiding homes to take pictures of their children and take them to prison the next day. What about all of the gaza strip obliberated by israeli airstrikes. Remember, Hamas didn't exist until israel started their ethinic cleansing of palestinians because apparantly "god promised them the land."


lol
wheelchair shmeelchair... these people need to show respect to the Israelis who allow them to share the Holy Land.
Original post by TercioOfParma
If there is an ethnic cleansing going on, how come both Gaza and Palestine have higher growth rates than Israel itself?

You think that Palestinians haven't done the same thing? The only difference is that Palestine is a technological backwater so it gets oppression points.


This is actually untrue, the Jewish birthrates are now higher than the Palestinian ones.


Yasser Aratw*t thought he could stall out peace, have more babies than the Jews then play the apartheid card. What he didn't bank on, was the godlike baby-making abilities of the Jewish religious right.


Hebron will be a Jewish city and the Palestinians only have themselves to blame.
Original post by TercioOfParma
Such is life. The Palestinians would probably do the same if not worse if they ever got to opportunity.


If they did I wouldn't cheer them on like you're doing.

Original post by admonit
The man was asked politely to leave. He refused. Then he was asked to leave less politely.. :cool:


Fair enough. Though the other guy was making the presumption that he was not in fault.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending