The Guardian: The last days of a white world (please read this concerning article)

This confirms what most of us have thought for years. I am happy for there to be more immigrants - by and large they work harder and have more money to spend.

We are suggesting the US be partitioned into states for blacks, whites, hispanics, and so on, along with multi-racial states for those who wish to continue with this experiment. Now is the time to begin such a multi-racial dialogue about separatism, before a storm of violent racial conflict erupts.

It's a matter of pure arithmetic that, if nothing else happens, non-Euro peans will become a majority and whites a minority in the UK. That would probably be the first time an indigenous population has voluntarily become a minority in its historic homeland.

Where America goes, Europe follows 30 years later. There is a potential for whites to become a minority in some European countries.

I don't think there's any doubt that within this century, white people will be a minority in every country in the world.

Every people under the sun have a right to their place under the sun, and the right to survive. If people predicted that Indians would be a minority in India in 2100, everyone would be calling it genocide.

Only white people worry about this. It's because for such a long time the world has been their own. To talk about it feeds a particular type of racism that says that blacks breed like rabbits. There is an underlying assumption that says white is right.

There is a white panic every time one part of their world seems to be passing over to anyone else. But it's foolish to panic about it. So what if we do become a majority? What difference does it make?

Population has never been the main determinant of influence - it's wealth and income. White people still have their hands on most of the levers of military and economic power.

The right-wing parties are growing in Somerset, not Brixton. The idea that more black people means more racism is not born out by the research. The more of us there are, it reduces racism.

If there are no majorities, then there's no minorities.

Skin colour shouldn't be an issue; yes, there might be some genetic differences between people of different races but I it's proven it's environment factors such as culture that really cause differences.
I absolutely think all races should be treated as equal but I'm not sure all cultures can be deemed as that way.

So the white race wins the Darwin Award, since they can't be bothered to have enough children to maintain their populations.


Before certain people inevitably try to weave this into a complex Jewish plot, the fact is that this is entirely the choice of white people - especially white men - who choose not to remain childless, or have only a single child. And the irony is, that the people who are concerned by these developments, still will likely not have many children themselves.

Japan has low birth rates yet doesn't bear an existentialist threat. It's not a matter of birth rates but a matter of weak borders and non-whites being politically incentivised by our governments to come to white countries. It is part of deliberate political and cultural will to make white people extinct, along with promoting "diversity" and shaming anyone who disagrees. If you had said in 1996 that white people would ever be a minority in the UK, people would look at you like you were crazy, no one knew immigration was ever going to be on the scale it has been, no one has ever consented to it, it has been forced on us and politicians have consistently lied about their intentions.

Unless you believe that the non-'Anglo-Saxon' white people are inferior then why is it concerning? Demographics change all the time and will continue to do so. But we're all human beings and are - according to the Americans at least - 'created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights'. So let what will be, be.

Japan's ageing population is an existential threat to their future prosperity.

There is no political or cultural movement to make white people 'extinct'.

Their future prosperity, perhaps, their future existence? No. For now they are doing fine even though economists have been preaching disaster since the 80's. You only need an ever growing population if your economies are built on the idea of infinite growth, which is a retarded idea everyone knows will burst eventually. Perhaps we should have an economic system that puts people and their culture first instead of the interests of internationalist elites with no stake in anything?

You also ignore the fact that diversity itself leads to low birth rates. White people in multicultural areas have less kids, they have less friends, feel more isolated etc. People have kids when they feel part of a community, community largely depends on a shared ethnic heritage. When you have a shared heritage in common with the people around you, there is a higher level of trust and happiness, people want to have kids more because they have stronger social circles, know all their children's friends parents etc.

The fact is multiculturalism is a corporate sham that is profoundly damaging to society and individuals.

So the white race wins the Darwin Award, since they can't be bothered to have enough children to maintain their populations.



Before certain people inevitably try to weave this into a complex Jewish plot, the fact is that this is entirely the choice of white people - especially white men - who choose not to remain childless, or have only a single child. And the irony is, that the people who are concerned by these developments, still will likely not have many children themselves.

...

There's no threat to the continued existence of Britain either. But Japan's aging population is going to exert a huge burden on their economy - to an extent this has already begun.

I doubt many Londoners feel more isolated than those living in other parts of our nation.

Multiculturalism is about culture, not race.