Paris restaurant refuses to serve Muslim women

So it is reasonable to ban Muslims from his restaurant? Yes or No?

There is indeed, by definition, one certain valid assumption we can make about the majority Muslims in general, regardless of race, nationality or culture.
That is; they all believe the Quran to be the infallible and immutable word of god. True in its entirely, not rejecting a single verse.
Because of this, it is therefore difficult to accept claims that most Muslims do not support actions permitted by the divine decree of the Quran.

You can't have it both ways. The two positions are funamentally contradictory.

If two Jewish people were banned from a shop for being Jewish there would rightfully be an outrage, why should it be different here?

people who believe in the infallibility of a text may interpret said text differently?

No, but it's less reasonable to ban gays.

Also they have no habit of beheading priests in churches.

Religious Jews never would eat in non-kosher restaurant. Also they have no habit of beheading priests in churches.

Do you believe in the infallibility of the text?

So that gives someone the right to treat their fellow human as unequal? Ok then. SMH.

No, owning a restaurant gives someone the right to decide who may or may not eat in that restaurant (whatever French law may have to say on the matter).

No, owning a restaurant gives someone the right to decide who may or may not eat in that restaurant (whatever French law may have to say on the matter).

Thank you, your honour.

And not allowing someone to enter because of their religion is discriminatory.

It depends entirely on what the reasons and context were.

There is indeed, by definition, one certain valid assumption we can make about the majority Muslims in general, regardless of race, nationality or culture.
That is; they all believe the Quran to be the infallible and immutable word of god. True in its entirely, not rejecting a single verse.
Because of this, it is therefore difficult to accept claims that most Muslims do not support actions permitted by the divine decree of the Quran.

You can't have it both ways. The two positions are funamentally contradictory.

You're welcome. I'll be here to clear up any other matters which you may be confused about.

WTF?
How does being in a relationship suddenly make homosexuality a choice?

That has got to be one of the most ridiculous arguments I have ever heard!

Non-profit religious institutions, private clubs, etc are distinct from businesses; the former can discriminate.

Backed up by science.

Not so. Bigotry is the "unreasonable intolerance of the views of others".
It is entirely reasonable to be intolerant of some things.

Discrimination and bigotry are two different things.

Anyone selecting a successful job candidate, or judging a competition, or choosing a restaurant is "discriminating". It is only "unreasonable" discrimination that is unacceptable.

No, owning a restaurant gives someone the right to decide who may or may not eat in that restaurant (whatever French law may have to say on the matter).