Hillary Clinton refuses to acknowledge Armenian genocide as a genocide

x

Just out of curiosity, are you capable of criticising Hillary without mentioning Donald?

Trump attacked a judge simply because he was of Mexican-American descent. He said that the families of terrorists should be tortured. He has repeatedly expressed admiration for Putin and Kim Jong-Il (and Trump is clearly very favourable to Russian interests). He's said many extreme and bigoted things. And he has paid the electoral price; Americans don't like it.



I don't think they "love" her; they see her as a competent candidate who will be far better than Trump.

And how did she "call" for the Iraq War? This is where conspiracy theorist/Trumpite ignorance gets quite irritating. She wasn't in power when the Iraq War happened, the Republicans were. She was in the senate, and she properly voted to give President Bush authority to use military force (and the senate was told that this would primarily be used as diplomatic leverage).

In any case, I don't see what's wrong with getting rid of a genocidal dictator. Iraq has its problems, but once ISIS has been dispatched Iraq will still be a democracy and on the road to rehabilitating as a nation. I simply don't see how it would be better if Qusay Hussein was now President of Iraq. And there's every possibility Iraq would have fallen apart anyway. Like Syria, it was a despotism run by a small sectarian/confessional clique minority. And like Syria, there was an appreciable likelihood that it could have fallen apart into civil war. The US didn't intervene in Syria, the country still fell apart and has had a civil war that makes Iraq's problems look tame by comparison.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Lets take the judge comment for example, Trump is against illegal immigrants, especially highlighting illegal Hispanic immigration. That judge is a member of a group which focuses on supporting and helping illegal Hispanic immigrants, it is entirely reasonable to suggest that the judge in question could be biased as a result of that.

I am certain that you were unaware of this, as you are ignorant of the US.

You appear to have neglected economics, energy, trade, international relations, gun control, anti-terror stance, diplomacy, equality in society, etc..

ALL of which Hillary Clinton's policies are vastly more developed - regardless of whether you agree with them or not.

I think refusing to acknowledge something is preferable to wanting to bomb innocent people:

skip to 1:39

[video="youtube;WWiaYQUV2oM"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWiaYQUV2oM[/video]

I don't see a problem. If the family produced a nut job who would fight for ISIS they are probably not all that innocent

So you're OK with her refusing to acknowledge a genocide, and her selling arms to the KSA for them to kill innocent Yemenis with? Shall we just ignore all that, because Trump (according to you) is worse?

assumptive, speculative, unwarranted implications that Hillary fights for ISIS, she doesn't.

You know, Hilary is a woman and don't you think its time we saw a woman president?

You know, Hilary is a woman and don't you think its time we saw a woman president?

Ya'll are just misogynist pigs who cant stand a woman being elected. I'm sure you're all racist, wife beating terrorists as well.

Did you know, Hilary is a woman? And isn't it about time we saw a woman president?

This from the man who has made himself a total Putin ally because he was on a promise of being able to put up a Trump hotel in Moscow. Doesn't say much for his credibility on anti-corruption.

Building a hotel in Moscow is corruption?? Uncle Putins not such a bad guy. I bet he's slaughtered less people then those M.E. folks you all have welcomed into your country. Putin never did anything to me. There's more anti American crap on tsr than I hear on Russian news. By far.

10 wks. till the election and Trumps not even in high gear yet. Hillarys numbers can go nowhere but down. Trumps, on the other hand.....

Building a hotel isn't corruption. Being willing to cancel major foreign policy positions of the most powerful country on the planet because you want to build a hotel - yeah, I'd guess a lot of people might class that as 'corrupt'. Just a wild guess.