Great Wall of Calais

Construction will begin shorty on the 'Great Wall of Calais'. It will cost the taxpayer £2million in an attempt to prevent migrants from crossing the Channel.
Do you think this is a waste of taxpayer pesos?
What is your opinion on the matter?

Spoiler

(edited 7 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

TercioOfParma

I would rather we paid France 2 million to demolish the Jungle and move everybody to the other end of their country.

Reply 2

Whopper88

they should double the height and make it electrified

and make france pay

Original post by Whopper88

they should double the height and make it electrified

How about they have snipers at the top.

Reply 5

Whopper88

Original post by L'absurde

How about they have snipers at the top.

And a mini gun too

Reply 6

user73867

A̶n̶d̶ ̶F̶r̶a̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶g̶o̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶p̶a̶y̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶i̶t̶!̶

Reply 7

username2313507

The wall just got 10 feet higher!

Reply 8

alevelstresss

Great wall? more like a wall to protect lorries..

Original post by Whopper88

and make france pay

Mexico will pay for it! By the time we build it, Mexico will have become experts at finding good deals for materials.

Reply 11

KingBradly

£2m really isn't much. Not really a big deal, just a big wall to stop migrants from climbing onto trucks.

Reply 12

Laomedeia

If immigrants really are as big a problem as they say, why dont the police just shoot them? Its all political BS.

Reply 13

lawyer3c

Original post by Laomedeia

If immigrants really are as big a problem as they say, why dont the police just shoot them? Its all political BS.

a little thing called 'human rights' us in the West profess to believe in to support our cultural superiority over 'savages'...

Reply 14

slaven

Where will they build a wall? Over the sea? They should just block the under wather tunnel and the problem is solved.

Reply 15

KingBradly

Original post by Laomedeia

If immigrants really are as big a problem as they say, why dont the police just shoot them? Its all political BS.

Slaughtering thousands of innocent people is generally considered a pretty horrific solution.

Reply 16

EdwardBarfield9

You know, I'm all for escaping warzones for a better life and if what has happened in Germany and France didn't, my opinion would be of the "It's a stupid idea" kind. However, because of the sheer amounts of attack and rape that has happened, combined with the fact that we can't seem to say anything against them but they can do whatever they want (even someone being able to drape themselves in a Isis flag in Westminister but a **** isis flag being told is wrong) changes my opinion. I am know on the side that supports it. Yes, many of the refugees are genuine and the extremists are a minority however we can't risk it. There religion and ideologies does not work with ours. They shouldn't have to come to the UK.

TLDR. Build it, I support it, **** extremists.

Reply 17

The_Opinion

Original post by KingBradly

Slaughtering thousands of innocent people is generally considered a pretty horrific solution.

They are criminals, so not exactly innocent.

Although I would personally just deport them all.

Reply 18

The_Opinion

Original post by EdwardBarfield9

You sound a little conflated.

Reply 19

Studentus-anonymous

Original post by TercioOfParma

I would rather we paid France 2 million to demolish the Jungle and move everybody to the other end of their country.

They'd just come back.

The only thing more amazing than their obsession with getting into the UK is the people who think their sheer bloodymindedness should be rewarded with an open door.

Although I'd love to see how they'd defeat the wall, as they'll inevitably try to.

There's a lot of European coastline for them to try illegal crossings.