Number of migrants claiming benefits in Germany surged by 169 percent from 2014-2015

It would be a bit time consuming to explain. I advice you to study what exactly did happen in Iran for starters, and after that to study other countries.
Also add to that Islam was in a middle of crisis during colonial era, that ended after WWII. It has far better environment now, when inidels are not dominating the world so obviously, and when political goals can be achieved on own ground.



You're right on the fact that US is trying to use local conflics for own interest's, but this isn't an only reason.
Husseing is a good example too. Although relatively secular, he prescribed Quran with own blood. Religions plays very important role in that part of the world and muslims are divided. There are other problems, such as local oligarchies etc.

Wow.

This forum genuinely is the Nazi Room. I suggest we put badges on all the Muslims to identify them and put them into Ghettos to keep the general population safe.

Sieg HEIL

Why not give an intellectual one instead of avoiding it because you don't have a clue

Wow.

This forum genuinely is the Nazi Room. I suggest we put badges on all the Muslims to identify them and put them into Ghettos to keep the general population safe.

Sieg HEIL

Even the far right sources can be right on something, right? If the Daily Mail reported smoking increases lung cancer, I'm not going to see it as my duty as a liberal to begin chain smoking.

And even if Breitbart was posting pure unrefined BS, what about the Reuters article, are they far right too? No, but you immediately jumped to accusing the OP of making out immigrants and Muslims to be criminals.

Like the British and the Americans overthrowing a genuinely democratic leader in 1953 because he went against their interests and replacing him with a tyrannical dictator?

The War in Terror begins = huge rise in terrorism.
Invasion of Iraq = another rise in terrorism.
Drone attacks = same result
Overthrowing of Gaddafi = same
Funding of Syrian FA and more fundamentalist groups = same result,

But you're right. Western foreign policy, mass murder, colonialism and exploitation does nothing to disillusion people and lead them into the arms of Wahabbis and other filth

If western foreign policy changed, are you claiming that these people would somehow be persuaded that their interpretations are incorrect and they would revert to more popular interpretations?

Wow.

This forum genuinely is the Nazi Room. I suggest we put badges on all the Muslims to identify them and put them into Ghettos to keep the general population safe.

Sieg HEIL

Don't pretend to me for one second that Mathemagicien didn't want to incriminate Muslims/immigrants by posting this...And obviously smoking causing lung cancer, a globally accepted consequence and backed up by scientific research, is entirely different to claiming some stuff about migrants wanting benefits....Breitbart is far-right, that is just a well-known fact. Reuters isn't. But each news source presented the far-right source of the FPO differently, Reuters was more balanced, whereas Breitbart was quick to politicise it into an anti-immigrant article.

There's a problem: an element of projection/mind-reading is required on your part. In other words he didn't post anything directly exhibiting racism. I'll elaborate:
if a bunch of my work colleagues posted here you'd accuse them of being racist and right-wing when ALL OF THEM are Indians and Pakistanis!

You're playing connect the dots when half the dots are missing. I think he trolled you and did a pretty good job of it too!

And as for the smoking point, it was an analogy, I'm not sure if you're being obtuse here or misunderstood what I'm trying to get across: whether or not a source is right-wing should not excuse you from ignoring points raised. You totally ignored the "unbiased" Reuters article (headline summarised: immigrants almost doubling benefit claim)- it wasn't addressed at all.

In your position I would've taken the Breitbart article, showed where it was right (factually, not politically, facts>politics), where it was wrong, explain what's going on in the Reuters article, etc.

New statistics released

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-benefits-idUSKCN11B11M

I suggest we put badges on all the Muslims to identify them and put them into Ghettos to keep the general population safe.

There will be a short term economic cost to the migrants for Germany but however - as we've seen with the UK - they will reap economic gain.

So it's Britain's responsibility to be the US's dog and help ruin countries around the world but when it comes to taking responsibility for their crimes, oh no! We have too many "poor" people to take in a few thousand more.