The Student Room Group

A New Generation of conservatives is on the rise, Study finds

The survey backs up claims made by Milo Yiannopoulos at a speech last month that young people are abandoning “the social justice craze” and that backlash is building to the hyper-restrictive culture of political correctness
http://heatst.com/world/a-new-generation-of-conservatives-is-on-the-rise-study-finds/

The Millenials, also that are current the most progressive, paradoxally having less sex than previous generation. This is a result of long year exposure to left-wing ideology.

http://heatst.com/life/millennials-are-having-zero-sex-and-no-one-exactly-knows-why/

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Praise Kek that he will grant us more victories
Original post by slaven
The survey backs up claims made by Milo Yiannopoulos at a speech last month that young people are abandoning “the social justice craze” and that backlash is building to the hyper-restrictive culture of political correctness
http://heatst.com/world/a-new-generation-of-conservatives-is-on-the-rise-study-finds/

The Millenials, also that are current the most progressive, paradoxally having less sex than previous generation. This is a result of long year exposure to left-wing ideology.

http://heatst.com/life/millennials-are-having-zero-sex-and-no-one-exactly-knows-why/


So-called left-wing millennials are often very puritanical at core. They're very frightened by sex. I saw a video of an SJW complaining about a pride event because all the sexually explicit stuff on display could trigger people, and because it was transphobic (somehow). This attitude has been growing for a while. I genuinely believe that these kinds of people are actually exactly the same kinds of people who were puritans and presbyterians back in the day, it's just now they don't use God to justify their insecurities, they use some backwards mental gymnastics.
and so it begins... :smile:
Original post by KingBradly
So-called left-wing millennials are often very puritanical at core. They're very frightened by sex. I saw a video of an SJW complaining about a pride event because all the sexually explicit stuff on display could trigger people, and because it was transphobic (somehow). This attitude has been growing for a while. I genuinely believe that these kinds of people are actually exactly the same kinds of people who were puritans and presbyterians back in the day, it's just now they don't use God to justify their insecurities, they use some backwards mental gymnastics.


Couldn't agree more.
Original post by slaven

The Millenials, also that are current the most progressive, paradoxally having less sex than previous generation. This is a result of long year exposure to left-wing ideology.


I think it's more because of phones&internet.
Original post by KingBradly
So-called left-wing millennials are often very puritanical at core. They're very frightened by sex. I saw a video of an SJW complaining about a pride event because all the sexually explicit stuff on display could trigger people, and because it was transphobic (somehow). This attitude has been growing for a while. I genuinely believe that these kinds of people are actually exactly the same kinds of people who were puritans and presbyterians back in the day, it's just now they don't use God to justify their insecurities, they use some backwards mental gymnastics.


Progressive politics is rooted in the Christian, particularly low Protestant church, the pathetic handwringing, slave morality and the tactic of purging non-conformity. The left-leaning technocratic middle class functions as clergy, fanatically policing the rest of society. University professors are more like priests busily promoting the accepted orthodoxies than heroic, paradigm changing scholars.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by West Bank Spank
Progressive politics is rooted in the Christian, particularly low Protestant church, the pathetic handwringing, slave morality and the tactic of purging non-conformity.


Yep, it actually is.
Reply 8
Original post by KingBradly
So-called left-wing millennials are often very puritanical at core. They're very frightened by sex. I saw a video of an SJW complaining about a pride event because all the sexually explicit stuff on display could trigger people, and because it was transphobic (somehow). This attitude has been growing for a while. I genuinely believe that these kinds of people are actually exactly the same kinds of people who were puritans and presbyterians back in the day, it's just now they don't use God to justify their insecurities, they use some backwards mental gymnastics.

Yes, you are indeed right.

My thoughts are that because of the left-wing ideology; also the constant propaganda of the supposed "rape culture" and this idea of the evil white male dominanted society actually feminised the average male in the west. Today they are afraid because of that to approach to a female as of fear being rejected. The males should have this "i dont give a fu.ck for anyhing" attitude again.
Than, thanks to feminism in the 1980s there is no more shivery again. Males used to open doors to ladies back than but the feminist called this for some reason "patriachal". So this once good geisture died out.
It is hillarious how in the supposed conservative 1950s people actually had more sex than the current degenrated PC millenials.

The only time when people had less sex than today was around the year 1920. But that was because a lot man died in the Great war and there was a shortage of them in society.
Original post by KingBradly
So-called left-wing millennials are often very puritanical at core. They're very frightened by sex. I saw a video of an SJW complaining about a pride event because all the sexually explicit stuff on display could trigger people, and because it was transphobic (somehow). This attitude has been growing for a while. I genuinely believe that these kinds of people are actually exactly the same kinds of people who were puritans and presbyterians back in the day, it's just now they don't use God to justify their insecurities, they use some backwards mental gymnastics.


You're right about a lot of them being puritanical. They claim to be progressive yet stifle debate and often hurl abuse at anyone who disagrees with them, that isn't remotely progressive. They can't cope when they leave their safe space and its consensus and enter the real world of diverse opinions.

I'm mostly left-of-centre but welcome discourse with people of all opinions and beliefs, it annoys me that being so is automatically conflated with these idiots.
Original post by ftw93
Praise Kek that he will grant us more victories


(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 11
Original post by MathMoFarah
I think it's more because of phones&internet.


I do not see like this. Actually because of the internet you would expect the effect would be the opposite. There is social media and apps like tinder which allows to find partners even faster and a more larger scale.
Reply 12
Original post by West Bank Spank
Progressive politics is rooted in the Christian, particularly low Protestant church, the pathetic handwringing, slave morality and the tactic of purging non-conformity. The left-leaning technocratic middle class functions as clergy, fanatically policing the rest of society. University professors are more like priests busily promoting the accepted orthodoxies than heroic, paradigm changing scholars.


As much I do not like this, I have to admit you are right. The guilt complex is also rooted in Christiniaty as well.
[video="youtube;lDUwXFvTJfA"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDUwXFvTJfA[/video]
Original post by slaven
I do not see like this. Actually because of the internet you would expect the effect would be the opposite. There is social media and apps like tinder which allows to find partners even faster and a more larger scale.


Tinder doesn't do anything you wouldn't do in real life - I was referring to it in the context of porn and lack of social skills.

Lack of social skills means people don't get it on.

Porn means they don't have to.
Original post by slaven
Yes, you are indeed right.

My thoughts are that because of the left-wing ideology; also the constant propaganda of the supposed "rape culture" and this idea of the evil white male dominanted society actually feminised the average male in the west. Today they are afraid because of that to approach to a female as of fear being rejected. The males should have this "i dont give a fu.ck for anyhing" attitude again.
Than, thanks to feminism in the 1980s there is no more shivery again. Males used to open doors to ladies back than but the feminist called this for some reason "patriachal". So this once good geisture died out.
It is hillarious how in the supposed conservative 1950s people actually had more sex than the current degenrated PC millenials.

The only time when people had less sex than today was around the year 1920. But that was because a lot man died in the Great war and there was a shortage of them in society.


You do realise that you're basically the same thing but on the other side of the spectrum.For a start chivalry has not died out, and many people still hold propriety in quite high regard. As the hard-left use their own propaganda you use yours. You're neo-liberal conservatism stems from your own insecurities just as the the "SJW's" regressive nature. IF you held the door open for 100 women not one of them would call you a sexist, or a patriarch, so why bother with the ********.At the end of the day, we're all people. I'm quite conservative myself, I've a stiff-upper-lip and I'm generally quite proprietous too. However whatever people choose to do with themselves is up to them. IF someone wants to have sex or not is irrelevant to my life, or yours. So I don't really see what it has to do with anything. I believe in liberty, but just as the people you speak of are attempting to restrict our liberties, you're trying to restrict theirs. People fought in 2 great wars to defend our liberties, to defend our right to speak out against the state, to speak out against each other. The SJW's are just exercising their rights as are you, so whilst I'm not asking you to stop complaining, I'm asking you to realise your own hypocrisy.
Reply 16
Original post by MathMoFarah
Tinder doesn't do anything you wouldn't do in real life - I was referring to it in the context of porn and lack of social skills.

Lack of social skills means people don't get it on.

Porn means they don't have to.


Oh, I see. I think you are right on this. Back than again I think they might get bored from porn and would need to find in real life something.

Even here on Relationships subthread it is not unrare to find people who never had sex in their mid-20s and asking for advices...
Original post by slaven
Yes, you are indeed right.

My thoughts are that because of the left-wing ideology; also the constant propaganda of the supposed "rape culture" and this idea of the evil white male dominanted society actually feminised the average male in the west. Today they are afraid because of that to approach to a female as of fear being rejected. The males should have this "i dont give a fu.ck for anyhing" attitude again.
Than, thanks to feminism in the 1980s there is no more shivery again. Males used to open doors to ladies back than but the feminist called this for some reason "patriachal". So this once good geisture died out.
It is hillarious how in the supposed conservative 1950s people actually had more sex than the current degenrated PC millenials.

The only time when people had less sex than today was around the year 1920. But that was because a lot man died in the Great war and there was a shortage of them in society.



Original post by JamesN88
You're right about a lot of them being puritanical. They claim to be progressive yet stifle debate and often hurl abuse at anyone who disagrees with them, that isn't remotely progressive. They can't cope when they leave their safe space and its consensus and enter the real world of diverse opinions.



I'm mostly left-of-centre but welcome discourse with people of all opinions and beliefs, it annoys me that being so is automatically conflated with these idiots.


Just read "On the Road" and then try to imagine SJWs living life like that. I think just reading the book would "trigger" the crap out of them, and this was something written in the late 40s. If they read "Naked Lunch" I think they'd evaporate. They truly are regressive and puritanical. No wonder they harbour sympathies for Islam while constantly denouncing "Western culture" (i.e liberal society). Don't make the mistake in thinking that these guys are anything close to being actual liberals, nor anything close to the same as the guys who opened up society and made it more liberal in the early to mid 20th century.
Reply 18
Original post by Lime-man
You do realise that you're basically the same thing but on the other side of the spectrum.For a start chivalry has not died out, and many people still hold propriety in quite high regard. As the hard-left use their own propaganda you use yours. You're neo-liberal conservatism stems from your own insecurities just as the the "SJW's" regressive nature. IF you held the door open for 100 women not one of them would call you a sexist, or a patriarch, so why bother with the ********.At the end of the day, we're all people. I'm quite conservative myself, I've a stiff-upper-lip and I'm generally quite proprietous too. However whatever people choose to do with themselves is up to them. IF someone wants to have sex or not is irrelevant to my life, or yours. So I don't really see what it has to do with anything. I believe in liberty, but just as the people you speak of are attempting to restrict our liberties, you're trying to restrict theirs. People fought in 2 great wars to defend our liberties, to defend our right to speak out against the state, to speak out against each other. The SJW's are just exercising their rights as are you, so whilst I'm not asking you to stop complaining, I'm asking you to realise your own hypocrisy.

It is hard to undersand your load of crap here. How exactly am I forcing people on anything?
Original post by slaven
It is hard to undersand your load of crap here. How exactly am I forcing people on anything?


You're just being a hypocrite. You and others claim that the SJW's are acting out of their own insecurities (which is probably true), however, it's not hard to believe that you're also acting out of your own insecurites.

When you talk about "the constant propaganda", that's just paranoia, there's no such propaganda.

When you talk about how the "idea of the evil white male dominanted society actually feminised the average male in the west" it's also just you being insecure. I don't feel any less masculine and that's because I don't let the opinions of a small minority of people affect my daily life. Do you? Because, if not then you're just like them with your conspiracy theory, tin-foil hatted ********.

When you said that "Males used to open doors to ladies back then", I take it that you don't hold doors open for women much, because if you did, then you'd know that your statement was utter twiddle.

When you say that "It is hillarious how in the supposed conservative 1950s people actually had more sex than the current degenrated PC millenials.". Why is it hilarious? Why does it matter? Sex is a private matter, I couldn't care less about how much or how little sex we're having as a society.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending