Do you actually believe in banning Muslims from entering the UK?

Well if we look at you first article it says, and I quote:

"Looking at a geographical breakdown, North America was by far the biggest owner, with 46pc of all foreign ownership.European investors owned 26pc, while those living in Asia held 16pc of quoted UK shares."

So we can see that 82% of that foreign investment is from Europe and America, only 16% from Asia, and there isn't even the Middle East mentioned at all. And you're saying most businesses are Middle Eastern and Asian?

Well, you provided the stats that just proved you wrong again. Also, 2014? 2 years doesn't really out date statistics.

Collective punishments are very wrong.

We should really get rid of the people that want to ban them

I think we should get rid of the people who want to get rid of people.

They are indeed.
Ironic really, that one of the fundamental tenets of Islam is the concept of collective punishment. And Muhammad set a rather unpleasant precedent with the massacre of the Banu Qurayza.

It was actually a war between their two tribes.
Yes, most were killed, But only the men who ere fighting. Islam states that; no child, no women, no elder, no religious persons, no ill ridden persons or those who give up should be killed.

However, there are stories of some converting to Islam.

No, people should be judged as individuals, not as a collective.

Not true. The Banu Qurayza were not involved in fighting against Muhammad. They had a treaty with Muhammad and he merely suspected them of being prepared to change sides if the tide changed (some claim that they supplied aid to his enemies but this is not supported by the hadith and later histories). They were besieged and surrendered on the condition that they would be treated fairly.
Every male above puberty was beheaded (several hundred). They determined if boys were old enough to be killed by checking for pubic hair. All the women and children were enslaved and all their property taken. The slaves were later exchanged with other tribes for arms and supplies.
Read Ibn Ishaq's biography for details, or Mubarakpuri's "the Sealed Nectar" or Lings' biography for a more modern read.

It's not. Hence why countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq have outlawed it. Unless you take Saudi Arabia to be the only 'true' Muslim country, when we all know the numerous barbaric things they do to their citizens daily.

Not true. The Banu Qurayza were not involved in fighting against Muhammad. They had a treaty with Muhammad and he merely suspected them of being prepared to change sides if the tide changed (some claim that they supplied aid to his enemies but this is not supported by the hadith and later histories). They were besieged and surrendered on the condition that they would be treated fairly.
Every male above puberty was beheaded (several hundred). They determined if boys were old enough to be killed by checking for pubic hair. All the women and children were enslaved and all their property taken. The slaves were later exchanged with other tribes for arms and supplies.
Read Ibn Ishaq's biography for details, or Mubarakpuri's "the Sealed Nectar" or Lings' biography for a more modern read.

My apologies... Wrong tribe.
I was talking about the Quraysh... Not sure about the Banu Qurayza . But what I was talking about was about the Quraysh. Sorry again.

Thank you for the reading suggestions.

Here is a summary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Banu_Qurayza
but as I know that some people have an immediate distrust of Wiki, the books I mentioned (all written by Muslims) give a full account.

http://1000gooddeeds.com/2012/11/20/10-islamic-rules-of-war/

Back then a child was a pre-pubescent person. My point still stands; Islam states that; no child, no women, no elder, no religious persons, no ill ridden persons or those who give up should be killed.

And yet, Muhammad authorised the execution of hundreds of prisoners who had voluntarily surrendered.

And personally, I would consider a boy who had just started to sprout pubic hair to be a "child". But then, Islam considers anyone who has displayed the first signs of puberty (first period, pubic hair, wet dream) to be an adult and liable to treatment as such. Which is why there is the issue with child marriages in Islam. After all, Muhammad consumated his marriage with Aisha when she was 9 years old.

Also, muhammad ordered the assassination Asma bint Marwan, because she had publicly insulted him (again, see Ibn Ishaq).

The statements "Islam forbids x" often do not tally with the behaviour of Muhammad. Kind of a "do what I say, not do what I do" sort of thing.

Well lets be honest here it would almost certainly solve our terrorism problem.Would also probably solve our FGM problem tbh.