"Anti-practicing Muslims"?
What does that even mean?
Anyway, like I stated above, it is because certain groups are in the minority. If Mormons started getting abuse in the Christian society and I seen it, I would defend the Mormon. If however a unitarian started criticising Trinitarians (who are in the majority) I would take less of an interest, though still would consider it a problem.
I could point out that you only ever show sympathy for certain groups who share your religious views, and not for those who don't. So I think there is a huge irony in your criticism of me. Anyway, as I just stated in my previous (if you actually bothered to read it), "using any offensive term is not good". That includes sectarian comments towards Sunnis in an I-Soc which is meant to be inclusive and non-sectarian. However, as I quite clearly explained, not all offensive terms are equally offensive.
Not at all. We are talking about a Muslim community with a Sunni majority and a Shia minority. It is the same reason why Pikey is no way comparable to the 'n-word'.
No, I don't care to see blatant hatred, especially when it involves a minority being on the receiving end. I also take issue in that the I-Soc claims to be a welcoming society, and yet with all the sectarianism I see, it fails to live up to these claims. If a claim is made, and isn't lived up to, whether it is an I-soc, Atheist soc, Christian soc etc.. then I will challenge it.