The Student Room Group

C3 Chain Rule

Came across this question and my solution is different from the textbook answer.
The curve C is defined by the equation:

y=4x2+12(1x)2y = \dfrac{4}{x^2} + \dfrac{1}{2(1-x)^2}

Show that there is only one stationary point and find its coordinates.

I used chain rule then found dy/dx to be:

(1x)38x3 (1-x)^{-3} - 8x^{-3}

When I set this equal to 0 I proved there was one stationary point but my x-coordinate was 1/3 when the book had 2/3.

Where have I went wrong?
Original post by ozmo19
Came across this question and my solution is different from the textbook answer.
The curve C is defined by the equation:

y=4x2+12(1x)2y = \dfrac{4}{x^2} + \dfrac{1}{2(1-x)^2}

Show that there is only one stationary point and find its coordinates.

I used chain rule then found dy/dx to be:

(1x)38x3 (1-x)^{-3} - 8x^{-3}

When I set this equal to 0 I proved there was one stationary point but my x-coordinate was 1/3 when the book had 2/3.

Where have I went wrong?


your dy/dx is fine...

1/( 1 - x ) 3 = 8/(x)3

cube root both sides... 1/( 1 - x ) = 2/(x)

*now rearrange & solve to get the book answer*
Reply 2
Original post by the bear
your dy/dx is fine...

1/( 1 - x ) 3 = 8/(x)3

cube root both sides... 1/( 1 - x ) = 2/(x)

*now rearrange & solve to get the book answer*


I had done this but had done
1/( 1 - x ) 3 = 1/8(x)3 by accident.

Thank you!
Original post by ozmo19
I had done this but had done
1/( 1 - x ) 3 = 1/8(x)3 by accident.

Thank you!


we are here to help :h: *
Reply 4
Original post by the bear
we are here to help :h: *


Not sure how to go about this one:


{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252
{\fonttbl\f0\fnil\fcharset0 ArialMT;}{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;\red80\green80\blue80;}\deftab720\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0\f0\fs32 \cf2 \expnd0\expndtw0\kerning0\outl0\strokewidth0 \strokec2 }
A: it is a product rule with a little bit of chain too...

u = e-x

v = 4e2x - 2ex

remember eax differentiates to aeax...

B: alternatively you could multiply out the brackets then you would not need the product rule ...
Reply 6
Original post by the bear
A: it is a product rule with a little bit of chain too...

u = e-x

v = 4e2x - 2ex

remember eax differentiates to aeax...

B: alternatively you could multiply out the brackets then you would not need the product rule ...


Took du/dx as e^-x and not -e^-x - Thanks for the reminder:biggrin:

Quick Reply

Latest