So Every time I work on maths I try to figure out the answer before even looking at the method shown in the book.
Why because I am aware the exam might throw me a curve ball of a question in a strange way I am not familiar with + step papers certainly wont be something I can rote learn.
I want to develop actual understanding of the math not just memorize methods. Maybe this is a bad of learning but I think it works quite well.
Anyway I remember reading from the Warwick maths page that many of their students have never struggled with maths before and they will when they get to university which can be a challenging change.
I don't know whether I class me as struggling or not, on the one hand I don't always figure it out if I have not seen very similar questions before. However I always understand it as soon as I see the methodology explained. I am yet to actually reach a stage where I just do not understand the method etc.
However sometimes whilst I have not seen the method to solving this exact problem everything i have seen previously should be sufficient to solve. Yet I have not always solved perfectly first time or spotted what to do first time. I understand it like I said when I see the answer and method.
Do es what I describe class as struggling with maths and if I want to get A*A*A* should I be worried about this?