Benefits - Only for lazy, stupid people....

It's better to try and fail than to fail altogether.

It's better to try and fail than to fail altogether.

I'm not certain about that one because their would be riots and chaos and a wholew lot worse and i think nopt trying a pathetic idea is betterthan trying a pathetic idea and I also find it pathetic that you are using stupid stereotypes for the whole country most people who are on benefits actually do need them and remember the government decided on checks for working ability a year afgo i think it was so i think that showed that 85% didn't start working.Your plans are not plausible and they also show that you don't understand the enconomy and with this great knowledge of bussiness you can open a bussiness then?

Sagacious,you are suggesting that you liked Britain where their where no benefits that was the time when children where down the mine so that's what you like and i wouldn't be suprised if you get your first warning point for your attitude in this thread.

The things is, not everyone is like your mum. The majority of people on benefits abuse the system. Yes, I bet 85% are 'Benefit Abusers'.

I personally think we should take the benefits off these 85% and use the money on Science/Paying off debts.

A good example of 'Benefit Abusers' was when EMA was around. People would go into college just to collect EMA (If you needed 60% attendance, people would work out that once they've done 60%, they can have a few weeks off). Also, EMA should have been used for educational purposes, instead the stupid Chavs went into town and bought junk that they don't need.

The only people who should get benefits;

Disabled people who are unable to work.
Single mothers who have to raise children under the age of 10. (Usually the mothers are stupid, but the child shouldn't suffer).

It would make this country work hard again. It's not that long ago that we was a world leading country. Now we're lazy and stupid; China aren't.

Wrong.

Try = Initial investment of several thousands of pounds. Including no attempts aty finding an actual job during that time as the time demands on starting a new business are incredible.

Likelihood of that business even breaking even = very, very low.

Likelihood of you wasting many months and many thousands of pounds = high.

Who says you need to spend money (much money), to start a business?

Who says you need to spend money (much money), to start a business?

To start a business that will have a small chance of resulting in profits that allow you to live off of them will need substantial input in comparison to previous household income ~(in this case, from previous benefits)

Please find me an example which the average person could do, with no start-up money, that has a reasonable chance of resulting in a business with profits allowing for a family to live off.

To start a business that will have a small chance of resulting in profits that allow you to live off of them will need substantial input in comparison to previous household income ~(in this case, from previous benefits)

Please find me an example which the average person could do, with no start-up money, that has a reasonable chance of resulting in a business with profits allowing for a family to live off.

it would be pretty difficult to without

Look, i'm not going to spoon feed you and Britain. Just research Theo Paphitis.

Look, i'm not going to spoon feed you and Britain. Just research Theo Paphitis.

But bussiness requires Exceptional Intelligence people on benefits do not have exceptional intelligence

Sagacious what is your backing, how old are you and are you currently any taxes?

I'm the square root of -1.

It doesn't but again, thank you for proving my point.

I'm the square root of -1.

and on that note I shall go to bed.