The Student Room Group

c4 differential equations and binomial

hey guys, stuck on q. 8(ii)(iii) and 9(ii) on this paper

for 8(ii), I simplified my partial fractions expression into:

(1+x)^-1 - (2+x)^-1 + 2(2+x)^-2
= (1+x)^-1 - 2(1+0.5x)^-1 + 4(1+0.5x)^-2
= 1-x+x^2 - 2[(1-0.5x+0.25x^2)] + 4[(1-x+0.75x^2)]
= 1-x+x^2 - (2-x+0.5x^2) + (4-4x+3x^2)
= 3.5x^2 - 4x + 3.

However the mark scheme says the answer is 1 - 1.25x + 1.25x^2, where have U gone wrong? also, how do I approach part (iii) on this q?

and for 9(ii), i've re-arranged and integrated and have:
-kt + c = ln (theta - 20)
When t = 0, theta is 100 so sub them in and get c = ln80
Sub in other data they tell u:
-5k + ln80 = ln48
k = -1/5 ln(3/5) therefore -(1/5 ln 3/5)t + ln80 = ln (theta - 20)

However the mark scheme says k = -1/5 ln(5/3), any ideas where I have gone wrong? and also how would you convert this equation into the way they want it, i.e. in terms of e?

cheers! :smile:
Original post by Next Level
hey guys, stuck on q. 8(ii)(iii) and 9(ii) on this paper

for 8(ii), I simplified my partial fractions expression into:

(1+x)^-1 - (2+x)^-1 + 2(2+x)^-2
= (1+x)^-1 - 2(1+0.5x)^-1 + 4(1+0.5x)^-2
= 1-x+x^2 - 2[(1-0.5x+0.25x^2)] + 4[(1-x+0.75x^2)]
= 1-x+x^2 - (2-x+0.5x^2) + (4-4x+3x^2)
= 3.5x^2 - 4x + 3.

However the mark scheme says the answer is 1 - 1.25x + 1.25x^2, where have U gone wrong? also, how do I approach part (iii) on this q?

and for 9(ii), i've re-arranged and integrated and have:
-kt + c = ln (theta - 20)
When t = 0, theta is 100 so sub them in and get c = ln80
Sub in other data they tell u:
-5k + ln80 = ln48
k = -1/5 ln(3/5) therefore -(1/5 ln 3/5)t + ln80 = ln (theta - 20)

However the mark scheme says k = -1/5 ln(5/3), any ideas where I have gone wrong? and also how would you convert this equation into the way they want it, i.e. in terms of e?

cheers! :smile:


For the first part; your error sits at taking a factor of 2 out of (2+x)^-1 and (2+x)^-2

(2+x)1=21(1+0.5x)1(2+x)^{-1} = 2^{-1}(1+0.5x)^{-1}

I'll take a look at the second part now.

EDIT: For the second part, the mark scheme says k = (1/5)ln(5/3)

You had k=15ln(35)=15ln((35)1)k = -\frac{1}{5}\ln(\frac{3}{5}) = \frac{1}{5}\ln((\frac{3}{5})^{-1})
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 2
Original post by hassi94
For the first part; your error sits at taking a factor of 2 out of (2+x)^-1 and (2+x)^-2

(2+x)1=21(1+0.5x)1(2+x)^{-1} = 2^{-1}(1+0.5x)^{-1}

I'll take a look at the second part now.

EDIT: For the second part, the mark scheme says k = (1/5)ln(5/3)

You had k=15ln(35)=15ln((35)1)k = -\frac{1}{5}\ln(\frac{3}{5}) = \frac{1}{5}\ln((\frac{3}{5})^{-1})


cheers for the feedback! I get my mistake for 8(ii), any ideas on how to do 8(iii)?

and oh yeah my bad, so I have:

1/5 ln (5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta - 20)
how do I simplify this to: theta = 20 + 80e^-(1/5 ln 5/3)t as the q wants it? cheers! :smile:
Original post by Next Level
cheers for the feedback! I get my mistake for 8(ii), any ideas on how to do 8(iii)?

and oh yeah my bad, so I have:

1/5 ln (5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta - 20)
how do I simplify this to: theta = 20 + 80e^-(1/5 ln 5/3)t as the q wants it? cheers! :smile:


For 8iii), note that the expansion for (1+x)^n (where n is non-natural) is only valid for 1x1-1 \leq x \leq 1


And for 9. Make sure not to miss out any minuses; you have -1/5 ln (5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta - 20)

Take the exponent of both sides. So eln801/5ln(5/3)t=θ20e^{ln80 - 1/5ln(5/3)t} = \theta - 20 then just mess around with the left hand side using laws of indices and that eln(x)=xe^{ln(x)} = x
Reply 4
ive had sex twice in the last hour, jelly bro?
Reply 5
Original post by hassi94
For 8iii), note that the expansion for (1+x)^n (where n is non-natural) is only valid for 1x1-1 \leq x \leq 1


And for 9. Make sure not to miss out any minuses; you have -1/5 ln (5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta - 20)

Take the exponent of both sides. So eln801/5ln(5/3)t=θ20e^{ln80 - 1/5ln(5/3)t} = \theta - 20 then just mess around with the left hand side using laws of indices and that eln(x)=xe^{ln(x)} = x


for 8(iii) why is this? where did u get that from? I don't follow why x has to be bounded by this inequality :s-smilie:

and for 9 I thought the minus is 'taken out' by using it to invert the 3/5 if u get what I mean?
Original post by Next Level
for 8(iii) why is this? where did u get that from? I don't follow why x has to be bounded by this inequality :s-smilie:

and for 9 I thought the minus is 'taken out' by using it to invert the 3/5 if u get what I mean?


It's just a fact for all expansions of that kind. It will say so in your formula booklet and your text book.

And for 9 - yes we got rid of the minus IN k; but there was a minus before k anyway:

You got k = 1/5ln(5/3) right?

And you also have -kt + ln80 = ln(theta-20)

Subbing k into that equation; we have -1/5ln(5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta-20)
Reply 7
Original post by hassi94
For 8iii), note that the expansion for (1+x)^n (where n is non-natural) is only valid for 1x1-1 \leq x \leq 1


And for 9. Make sure not to miss out any minuses; you have -1/5 ln (5/3)t + ln80 = ln(theta - 20)

Take the exponent of both sides. So eln801/5ln(5/3)t=θ20e^{ln80 - 1/5ln(5/3)t} = \theta - 20 then just mess around with the left hand side using laws of indices and that eln(x)=xe^{ln(x)} = x


ah sorry I forgot the minus; but I don't see how you got it from that stage to the exponent one, what do you mean take the exponent of both sides? how do you do this with all terms in the expression as ln terms?
Original post by Next Level
ah sorry I forgot the minus; but I don't see how you got it from that stage to the exponent one, what do you mean take the exponent of both sides? how do you do this with all terms in the expression as ln terms?


Take the exponent just means do e^ each side.
Reply 9
Original post by hassi94
Take the exponent just means do e^ each side.


so why is the last term not e^theta - 20?
Original post by Next Level
so why is the last term not e^theta - 20?


Because its e^ln(theta - 20) and e^lnx = x

Quick Reply

Latest