The Student Room Group

18 pregnant and want to go UNI!

Scroll to see replies

Reply 100
Original post by Cicerao
Easiest part of the career being the one where you receive the tiniest salary and have the lowest education and training, and fewest or no assets to your name, yes? I can't see the majority of teenage reproduction as anything but foolish. My perspective: the unfortunate sibling of a teenage breeder whose age, immaturity, lack of experience or finance HAD DEFINITELY had a negative impact on the multiple children.


So what's the difference between a teenager with a kid, who'll have prospects of getting a good job in the future, with a 30 year old with a kid, working at minimum wage part time, and has very little prospects of getting a good job in the future?
You need to prioritise.

The only way I can see you going to uni is if you have an abortion, which despite the fact most Tsrians support abortion they probably wouldn't in a real-life case like this.

So therefore I would postpone your studies to care and look after your baby.
Original post by hannaaahlima
you boyfriend was a solicitor with a good salary and owned a house...good for him! what about you? or are you one of those women who live off their partner's money? because it seems so.

and yes, i can list many things you are missing out on. you can't dedicate 100% to your studies, you can't just make decisions in your life without thinking how this will affect your child, you have much more responsibilities than the normal 22-year-old, you can't just sleep or study all day or just go out without arranging for her to stay with someone, you can't socialise as much, you can't travel as much, you can't do an exchange programme and the list is just beginning.

and as for my parents' parenting skills, i'm sure they are better than your parents' parenting skills since they have raise a dedicated girl who wants to be financially independent and is studying very hard to be a lawyer in a top tier university while enjoying her life with responsibility, and not a 22-year-old single mum who does distance learning and rely on the baby's father money.


If you read my previous posts, I was a student- training to be a vet. My boyfriend didn't actually give me a penny, nor did my parents. I worked, and have done since I was 16. Soon as I hit sixteen, I went out and got a job and paid for everything myself since.

Dedication to my studies- I am actually. I have recieved straight distinctions in the modules I have done so far, and although I am a little behind at the moment, im still on target to finish 3 weeks before I set my target for.

Sleeping all day? Im not a dirty sloth. Sorry if you are, but some of us don't want that life style
Studying all day? I do actually. Usually 9-12, have a two hour break to play with my daughter, and then I go back to studying until 5/5.30 when I give my daughter her tea, her bath, read her book and put her to bed.
Its not a problem to arrange for someone to stay with her, I can arrange that with 12 hours notice. Sometimes I have to pay for a sitter, sometimes my family will help out- although I obviously don't take the mick.
My ex's Mum mainly looks after her during the day- but she volunteered to do this, and I give her a bit of money for doing it.
Socialising- I am quite happy with my social life if im honest. I still manage to get out 2/3 nights a week and tbh- I probably wouldnt have it any other way if my circumstances were different.
Travelling- If anything, I am travelling more than I was. Went back to the US for Christmas, spent a week in February in Majorca with my parents (yes, i paid for me and my daughter) and I am going away for hen weekend in June.

You might be training to be a lawyer sweetie, good on you- they brought you up to be intelligent. But they seriously need to do something to that attitude and personality of yours.
None of you people seem to think this woman isn't insulted by the fact your suggesting she kills her own child?
Original post by MikeySwansea
My advice is to have an abortion. You know it makes sense.


This.

@above, it's nowhere near a child yet. "due mid december". If people are offended by the suggestion of a possible, and obvious, solution, they shouldn't ask for advice.

Original post by Tahooper

The only way I can see you going to uni is if you have an abortion, which despite the fact most Tsrians support abortion they probably wouldn't in a real-life case like this.


Congrats on the wholly warranted assumption, bro. Seriously, where the hell did you get that idea from?
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by TimmonaPortella
This.

@above, it's nowhere near a child yet. "due mid december". If people are offended by the suggestion of a possible, and obvious, solution, they shouldn't ask for advice.


In her opinion it could be that it is her child. People need to realize that just because they believe getting into uni a couple of years late warrants an abortion it doesn't mean other people do. And how on earth can you say "get an abortion" as if you think she didn't know the possibility of abortion existed if she wanted one.
Reply 106
Original post by zaliack
So what's the difference between a teenager with a kid, who'll have prospects of getting a good job in the future, with a 30 year old with a kid, working at minimum wage part time, and has very little prospects of getting a good job in the future?


What is the difference:
* Older and therefore more experience of life in general. The ridiculous "some 13 year olds act more mature than 30 year olds" line is irrelevant - even forgetting comparisons to other people, that same 13 year old would be more mature and capable if they had waited until they were 30.
* Far easier to relate to and receive help from peers as the average age of having a first child is ~29.
* A 30 year old with a job has at least some level of income and most likely has some form of long-term accommodation beyond the parents' basement. An infant needs immediate financial support and cannot live off "prospects of getting a good job in the future."
* Setting a responsible example to the child to actually have a childhood themselves before reproducing.
* The divorce and separation percentage is skyhigh for the under 25s and gradually decreases relative to age, making the chance of the parents still being together far more likely.
* Growth is completed in a 30 year old, which it is not in younger teenagers, which can lead to complications.
* A 30 year old is not a child. A teenager under 18 is.

What is the similarity:
* There is nothing inherently "prospective" about a teenager VS a 30 year old. Both have opportunities.

I know you've made your bed and had to lie in it, so of course I understand your desperate grasping for arguments supporting teen pregnancy. But the fact of the matter is, 9/10 the only ones who don't see it as a disadvantage are those who either messed up and got (/someone) pregnant OR their own parents did. There is no argument on this planet that is going to convince the majority of the population that teenage reproduction in this day and age is a grand idea. Because it simply isn't.

This is not a commentary on your own parenting or lack thereof, depending on the situation. It is a general outlook. After witnessing the effects of reckless teenage breeding - and having witnessed no situation where, even if the parents are doing a good job, they wouldn't have been better off waiting a few years - I shan't be convinced otherwise.
Original post by Dominic101
In her opinion it could be that it is her child. People need to realize that just because they believe getting into uni a couple of years late warrants an abortion it doesn't mean other people do. And how on earth can you say "get an abortion" as if you think she didn't know the possibility of abortion existed if she wanted one.


She didn't come on here to ask for her own opinion. That would be stupid. Saying "her opinion might be otherwise, so don't say it" is ridiculous.

The fact, however, is that a month in development a "baby" is nothing approaching human.

Advice isn't only permissible when the suggestion is something entirely new to the person asking for advice. That again would be a stupid view to take. I suggest that if she wants to go to uni she has an abortion, and there's nothing at all improper about my doing so.
Why don't we wait to hear from OP whether she want's an abortion or not. and @ above it is a fetus so by nature surely it is approaching "human". I don't see where she says she wanted advice on whether to have an abortion or not.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 109
Original post by NYprincessmaddie
There is no appropriate age, you will never be fully ready to have children.

However, there is an appropriate attitude. I suggest you grow up and change yours if you ever hope to bring up a child properly.

Yes, there is an appropriate age. An eighteen year old, the majority of the time, will not make a good mother. I know there are exceptions but they are few and far between. A 30 year old with a stable job will be much more prepared to raise a child than an 18 year old who isn't even at university.
Original post by Dominic101
None of you people seem to think this woman isn't insulted by the fact your suggesting she kills her own child?


She's 1 month pregnant, there's no baby in her womb just an embryo and an embryo is NOT an actual human being :redface:
Original post by Jackso
Yes, there is an appropriate age. An eighteen year old, the majority of the time, will not make a good mother. I know there are exceptions but they are few and far between. A 30 year old with a stable job will be much more prepared to raise a child than an 18 year old who isn't even at university.


Your clueless. I don't blame you for that, because people who don't have children have no idea what its like.

They pee, they poop, they eat, they sleep. You comfort their cries, you change their diapers, you put food in their mouths.

There isn't an appropriate age for that. Maturity does come into play, obviously when they get older and they start to learn by example.

Age is a number.
You forget if bringing up a child is too much to handle you could easily give the child up for adoption.
Original post by zaliack
Are you yourself a young parent?

The biggest thing that pisses me off is when people presume that just because you have a child around the age of 18, then that child is having a crappy life. Age does not mean anything when it comes to quality of life.

Also, regarding age, lets say I'm female and I'm thinking of giving birth. I can either do it at 18, or I can wait till i'm 22 to finish my law degree. Then I'd have to wait a year to do the BPTC, and another year to get through the pupillage (let's say criminal, as it's lowest paid). So I'm 24, but as I'm not entitled to maternity pay due to being self employed, i'll need to work and save up abit. Let's not forget to get a mortgage, car etc. 15 years later, just became QC and I'm 39 now. Perfect time to have a child. Which I now have more difficulty to become pregnant, and more risks associated with pregnancy. Or I could have had a child at 18, during the easiest part of my career, who would now be heading off to University themselves.


don't be silly, i can't believe you are actually defending the idea of having a child when you're 18! you will miss so many important life experiences and you won't be able to dedicate 100% IN THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF YOUR CAREER, which is when you're around 18 doing your undergraduate degree.

and why do you want to have a child now so bad? just wait until you have a stabilised career and marriage, and is financially and emotionally prepared to raise a child.

i'm a law student too and i would never be able to study as hard as i do if i had a child. and it's not just about education, think about all the opportunities you could miss. you could've studied abroad, enjoyed full the whole university experience, socialised much more. of course you're gonna say "but i do", but you know, and I know and we all know it is not the same. you always have to arrange for your child to stay with someone else, and you will always be wondering if they are okay. not to mention the sleepless nights when you will have exams the next morning.

anyway, i think you are bringing up this arguments more for yourself than for me, but there is nothing you can say to me that is going to change my mind that having a baby at the age of 18 is a stupid idea. the baby would be better off being brought up by a stable couple financially and emotionally prepared to raise them. full stop.

stop trying to convince yourself of anything. you've done ****, now deal with it.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 114
Original post by Cicerao
What is the difference:
* Older and therefore more experience of life in general. The ridiculous "some 13 year olds act more mature than 30 year olds" line is irrelevant - even forgetting comparisons to other people, that same 13 year old would be more mature and capable if they had waited until they were 30.Having a child forces you to mature faster
* Far easier to relate to and receive help from peers as the average age of having a first child is ~29. It'd be a lot easier if our 'peers' didn't look down on us just because we are young
* A 30 year old with a job has at least some level of income and most likely has some form of long-term accommodation beyond the parents' basement. An infant needs immediate financial support and cannot live off "prospects of getting a good job in the future." Student finance + child tax credits + housing benefit + childcare vouchers
* Setting a responsible example to the child to actually have a childhood themselves before reproducing. That's an issue with general parenting, not specific to the age you have children at
* The divorce and separation percentage is skyhigh for the under 25s and gradually decreases relative to age, making the chance of the parents still being together far more likely. Our society has changed so it has now become more acceptable to leave your partner, as opposed to be shunned upon for doing so
* Growth is completed in a 30 year old, which it is not in younger teenagers, which can lead to complications. Over 30's start to lead to more complications, such as difficulty conceiving and higher chances of genetic disorders. A 20 year old is 'ripe' for birth.
* A 30 year old is not a child. A teenager under 18 is.

What is the similarity:
* There is nothing inherently "prospective" about a teenager VS a 30 year old. Both have opportunities.

I know you've made your bed and had to lie in it, so of course I understand your desperate grasping for arguments supporting teen pregnancy. But the fact of the matter is, 9/10 the only ones who don't see it as a disadvantage are those who either messed up and got (/someone) pregnant OR their own parents did. There is no argument on this planet that is going to convince the majority of the population that teenage reproduction in this day and age is a grand idea. Because it simply isn't.

This is not a commentary on your own parenting or lack thereof, depending on the situation. It is a general outlook. After witnessing the effects of reckless teenage breeding - and having witnessed no situation where, even if the parents are doing a good job, they wouldn't have been better off waiting a few years - I shan't be convinced otherwise.


I'm fully aware of the disadvantages of teenage pregnancies, however our society needs to stop stigmatising those people who already have children. I find it annoying as hell when people spout off about things which we know a lot more about as parents, then they do from watching someone else raise a kid. I particularly loathe it when people look down on me just because I've had a kid young, I love my daughter and playing with her, and I'd much rather be doing that alongside my law degree than going out drinking, partying etc, because that's just not me.
If you keep the baby, just don't come crying to momma that you can't cope with the responsibilities of being a mother at such a young age and combining it with your studies.

If I was you I would abort it, enjoy my uni life to the fullest and have a kid after you graduate. Going to uni is a once in a lifetime opportunity if you think about it and you want to experience everything the average university student gets to experience.

You may think it's cruel to abort the baby but the limit isn't until 24 weeks and there's a reason why abortions exist. Aborting a baby is no different than putting a dog down or eating meat. Remember, 18 and pregnant doesn't really end well.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 116
Original post by NYprincessmaddie
Your clueless. I don't blame you for that, because people who don't have children have no idea what its like.

They pee, they poop, they eat, they sleep. You comfort their cries, you change their diapers, you put food in their mouths.

There isn't an appropriate age for that. Maturity does come into play, obviously when they get older and they start to learn by example.

Age is a number.


Children under the age of 16 are banned from purchasing even easy-to-care-for pets. Make of that what you will.
Original post by Dominic101
You forget if bringing up a child is too much to handle you could easily give the child up for adoption.


Wouldn't happen in a million years. If you keep your child, you would have to break your own heart to give it up- especially if you have been playing a role in their up bringing.
Original post by Cicerao
Children under the age of 16 are banned from purchasing even easy-to-care-for pets. Make of that what you will.


Some under 16s are parents, so what? Granted there are some that can't cope- and social services intervene and the child is taken into care.

The maturity on this thread, in fact this forum, is shocking. I can only hope that you mature with age- for some it cannot be learnt obviously.
Reply 119
Original post by hannaaahlima
don't be silly, i can't believe you are actually defending the idea of having a child when you're 18! you will miss so many important life experiences and you won't be able to dedicate 100% IN THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF YOUR CAREER, which is when you're around 18 doing your undergraduate degree.

and why do you want to have a child now so bad? just wait until you have a stabilised career and marriage, and is financially and emotionally prepared to raise a child.

i'm a law student too and i would never be able to study as hard as i do if i had a child. and it's not just about education, think about all the opportunities you could miss. you could've studied abroad, enjoyed full the whole university experience, socialised much more. of course you're gonna say "but i do", but you know, and I know and we all know it is not the same. you always have to arrange for your child to stay with someone else, and you will always be wondering if they are okay. not to mention the sleepless nights when you will have exams the next morning.

anyway, i think you are bringing up this arguments more for yourself than for me, but there is nothing you can say to me that is going to change my mind that having a baby at the age of 18 is a stupid idea. the baby would be better off being brought up by a stable couple financially and emotionally prepared to raise them. full stop.

stop trying to convince yourself of anything. you've done s.h.i.t, now deal with it.


I'm not convincing myself of anything, what I want is for this crappy stigmatising of young parents to stop. Yes, I'll miss so many life experiences, however I gain so many more in turn. I'm still able to do mooting, competitions, planning to apply for some pupillages next year, apply for CAB etc. I'm sorry if your struggling with your law degree, but I find that I'm coping pretty damn well with looking after my daughter. I have a responsibility to take care of my daughter, that makes me want to get to the top end of the bar (Well, to be accurate, I'm planning on becoming a Supreme Court Justice by the time im 60 :wink:). Prior to my daughter, I was pretty damn lazy and had a half arsed dream about becoming a doctor without even going to any of my classes in high school. So having my daughter was good for me. I'm not trying to convince you to have one, I'm trying to convince you to accept the fact that people have kids young, and to accept that they can be just as good of parents as a 30 year old.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending