The Student Room Group

6 Fatal Flaws of Evolution

Fatal Flaws of Evolution

1. Evolution Origins: Darwin and Wallace aside, evolutionists have no clue about where ‘the process of evolution’ came from. Couple this with the fact that they have no idea where life started or what the ‘common ancestor was’ tells us that evolutionists are just the ‘blind leading the blind’.

With no answers to these important issues, they havenothing to offer the world

2. Why Earth: This is another question evolutionists cannot answer. Without finding life on other planets, the question ‘why earth’ is very important. There is no reason for earth to be the only planet selected for life or the process’. Too many other questions arise as well. How did evolution get here? How did it form? Why would it form? Why would it get involved in life?

Just too many unanswered questions and it seems evolutionists are left with little more than ‘just because’ or ‘why not’. They complain about Christians saying ‘God did it’ but they are in the same boat when evolution is investigated beyond the surface.

3. Time: This is a killer as no matter how one looks at it, the time factor either provides an excuse for failing to provide evidence or it is just ridiculous as they have homo erectus surviving for a million years without fire or heat.

Even cats know to find warmth when it gets cold and one would think that early man would have done the same. Yet evolutionists want us to think that we descended from complete dolts.

Finally, science cannot tell us what we did last week let alone 2,000 years ago. How do they expect that they can say what took place 100,000,000 years ago or more/less? It is just ridiculous.

4. Evolution is clueless: it has been repeatedly said that evolution is a process, that it doesn’t know anything yet it was able to ‘guide’ all species through all environmental conditions until it found the right combination to allow life to exist unimpeded. It was also able to create diversity even though it has no clue what variety , creativity, and other characteristics found in life today, are.
This just stretches credibility way too far as there is no way it could come up with the function of each species and fit each role perfectly into life.

This is perpetuating the idea of ‘something from nothing’ as ‘the process’ has nothing yet it was able to produce everything from preferred diets, down to different colors.

5. Reproduction systems: Here is another vital life function that evolutionary adherents cannot explain why it exists. There is no reason why ‘the process’ would develop reproduction through sexual activity, there would be no need for it, nor concept that such a practice would be needed, nor can they explain why men need to have release more than women.
6. Morality: Another vital issue that evolutionists cannot explain. They may try to say it comes from a gene yet how did the gene ‘conceive of it’? or where did the gene receive the idea of morality or that it would be needed?
In evolution, where survival of the fittest is the key theme, morality plays no role for evolution is all about anarchy not moral behavior. Since evolution knows nothing, it is impossible for it to instill proper behavior in its resulting forms and it could not provide an ideal standard for its product to use as a guide.
At best, only animal instincts would reside in all species including humans, meaning that a Hitlerian attitude against the sick and weak would reign without competition from those who disagree.
7. Religious Issues: Evolution is not God and knows nothing thus the concept of God or even a god(s) would be absent from all humans. There would be no desire to find God and no reason to even think about superior beings because there would be no need for such hope.

With no concept of God, no guidance from a moral ideal, life on earth would just be one animal attacking another animal for its possessions. Since there would be no rules, then all is good and it wouldn’t matter what one person did to another, there would be no punishment for killing, raping and other crimes as there would be no definition of what a crime was.

Evolution doesn’t know anything thus it could not instill in its species any desire for a moral life for no one would know what morality was? With no concept of God or a god, there would be no religions whatsoever and no reminder of that one is living a less than stellar life. It would be total anarchy.

CONCLUSION:

It is clear that 'the process of evolution' has no idea that humans exist, does not care if they live or die and provides very little in the way of guidance and information to help people live better lives.

Yet many choose this path over someone who does care if they live or die, does know that they exist and does provide information to guide humans along with providing hope, love and eternal life after death, if they make the right choice.

Unfortunately, the adherents of 'the process' will reject this person because 1. the information comes in an ancient book; 2. provides little physical evidence; 3. doesn't put man at the top of the 'food chain'; 4. allows them free choice

Obviously, those who believe in God are not the ones chasing a fairy tale or being irrational but are making a better choice.


RESOURCES:

http://www.trueorigin.org/sex01.asp

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-definition.html

http://www.uncg.edu/psy/courses/calogan/438/content/ModelsBE.htm

http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Theory_of_evolution

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIE2aOriginoflife.shtml

http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/origin_and_evolution_of_earth_final.pdf

http://www.evolutionary-philosophy.net/sex.html

http://thankgodforevolution.com/blog/evolutionary-morality-and-ethics

http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SUA12/mammaldino598.php

http://www.twoorthree.net/2007/08/fossil-evidence.html

http://www.historyoftheuniverse.com/tl1.html

http://www.biblestudy.org/basicart/who-was-neanderthal-man-was-he-the-missing-link.html

http://www.iend.org/dad/dna.html

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
There are so many mistakes in this post that I'll only point out that the fact you can't count to 6 properly suggests this may not be a well thought out post.
alright then....
Reply 3
ok, here's my 6 flaws in evolution.

1. You
2. You
3. You
4. You again
5. You yet again.
and finally
6. omg! You!

All done.
The one fatal flaw of this thread; you cannot count.
Reply 5
AnthonyH91
Fatal Flaws of Evolution


2. Why Earth: This is another question evolutionists cannot answer. Without finding life on other planets, the question ‘why earth’ is very important. There is no reason for earth to be the only planet selected for life or the process’. Too many other questions arise as well. How did evolution get here? How did it form? Why would it form? Why would it get involved in life?




Why not Earth?
If could've been anywhere else, but the only reason your alive to ask this is because it was Earth.
Reply 6
God did it.
"A junkyard contains all the bits and pieces of a Boeing-747, dismembered and in disarray. A whirlwind happens to blow through the yard. What is the chance that after its passage a fully assembled 747, ready to fly, will be found standing there?"

This quote concisely sums what a load of crap evolution is.
4 Fatal Flaws of God:

1. Charles Darwin.
2. Richard Dawkins.
3. Religious scripture.
4. Making you.
Reply 9
This is one of the stupidest topics I have ever seen and the OP is so full of fail I cant even begin to start. But you know what, if you are a creationist good for you. If your beliefs are so strong why do you always appear so desperate to disprove peer reviewed science?
AnthonyH91
1. Evolution Origins: Darwin and Wallace aside, evolutionists have no clue about where ‘the process of evolution’ came from. Couple this with the fact that they have no idea where life started or what the ‘common ancestor was’ tells us that evolutionists are just the ‘blind leading the blind’.

With no answers to these important issues, they havenothing to offer the world
It didn't 'come from' anywhere. It is a natural process that will always occur under conditions similar to this; if you understood evolution, you'd know that.

AnthonyH91
2. Why Earth: This is another question evolutionists cannot answer. Without finding life on other planets, the question ‘why earth’ is very important. There is no reason for earth to be the only planet selected for life or the process’. Too many other questions arise as well. How did evolution get here? How did it form? Why would it form? Why would it get involved in life?

Just too many unanswered questions and it seems evolutionists are left with little more than ‘just because’ or ‘why not’. They complain about Christians saying ‘God did it’ but they are in the same boat when evolution is investigated beyond the surface.
Again, evolution didn't 'get here' or 'form' or 'get involved'. It is a natural process. Evolution does not explain the existence of life, it just explains how it changes over time. As for why earth: I don't believe earth is necessarily the only planet with life.

AnthonyH91
3. Time: This is a killer as no matter how one looks at it, the time factor either provides an excuse for failing to provide evidence or it is just ridiculous as they have homo erectus surviving for a million years without fire or heat.

Even cats know to find warmth when it gets cold and one would think that early man would have done the same. Yet evolutionists want us to think that we descended from complete dolts.
Evolution doesn't necessarily happen to satisfy a purpose. It sometimes doesn't even happen for a reason (though mostly does). That said, I don't know what you're talking about, so I can't answer you.

AnthonyH91
Finally, science cannot tell us what we did last week let alone 2,000 years ago. How do they expect that they can say what took place 100,000,000 years ago or more/less? It is just ridiculous.
Science doesn't tell us what someone was doing exactly 100 million years, 0 months, 0 days, 0 hours and 0 minutes ago. We can make very obvious guesses about environment and resources from things we have left over, and so we know roughly the sort of thing that must have happened there. A big example is fossils. We know exactly what sort of animal lived where - we don't know the colour of its fur, but we do know its bone and tooth structure, which tells you not just its size and shape but also what it ate.

AnthonyH91
4. Evolution is clueless: it has been repeatedly said that evolution is a process, that it doesn’t know anything yet it was able to ‘guide’ all species through all environmental conditions until it found the right combination to allow life to exist unimpeded. It was also able to create diversity even though it has no clue what variety , creativity, and other characteristics found in life today, are.
This just stretches credibility way too far as there is no way it could come up with the function of each species and fit each role perfectly into life.
Evolution is not one path that each species goes down. It's very simple. A group of animals of one species in one habitat naturally faces challenges; if some of these animals are badly adapted to these challenges they might (for very obvious reasons) die out, leaving those that are better adapted alive. And please don't pretend to believe for a second that hundreds of thousands of species haven't died out completely in this way; of course they have.

AnthonyH91
5. Reproduction systems: Here is another vital life function that evolutionary adherents cannot explain why it exists. There is no reason why ‘the process’ would develop reproduction through sexual activity, there would be no need for it, nor concept that such a practice would be needed, nor can they explain why men need to have release more than women.
Again, evolution doesn't happen due to a 'need'. It just happens. Sometimes it's useful, sometimes it has no effect, sometimes it actually harms, damages or even kills off a species.

AnthonyH91
6. Morality: Another vital issue that evolutionists cannot explain. They may try to say it comes from a gene yet how did the gene ‘conceive of it’? or where did the gene receive the idea of morality or that it would be needed?
Of course they can't explain it. Morality and evolution are nothing to do with each other. You want to talk to a philosopher about that.

AnthonyH91
7. Religious Issues: Evolution is not God and knows nothing thus the concept of God or even a god(s) would be absent from all humans. There would be no desire to find God and no reason to even think about superior beings because there would be no need for such hope.
Yes, or "God performs evolution".
Reply 11
you're right
i must re-evaluate my life
Reply 12
I could answer every one of those points logically, even as pissed I am but I haven't got the energy. I might want to take a look in the morning but it's unlikely.
Reply 13
You seem to be considering Evolution to be a sentient being. It is not, it is a process, and frankly, your statements suggest to me that you don't even know what that process is. Why don't you go learn about evolution, and come back when you know a bit more than sh1t all.
Reply 14
munn
you're right
i must re-evaluate my life


:rofl: :awesome:
AnthonyH91
Fatal Flaws of Evolution

1. Evolution Origins: Darwin and Wallace aside, evolutionists have no clue about where ‘the process of evolution’ came from. Couple this with the fact that they have no idea where life started or what the ‘common ancestor was’ tells us that evolutionists are just the ‘blind leading the blind’.

With no answers to these important issues, they havenothing to offer the world

2. Why Earth: This is another question evolutionists cannot answer. Without finding life on other planets, the question ‘why earth’ is very important. There is no reason for earth to be the only planet selected for life or the process’. Too many other questions arise as well. How did evolution get here? How did it form? Why would it form? Why would it get involved in life?

Just too many unanswered questions and it seems evolutionists are left with little more than ‘just because’ or ‘why not’. They complain about Christians saying ‘God did it’ but they are in the same boat when evolution is investigated beyond the surface.

3. Time: This is a killer as no matter how one looks at it, the time factor either provides an excuse for failing to provide evidence or it is just ridiculous as they have homo erectus surviving for a million years without fire or heat.

Even cats know to find warmth when it gets cold and one would think that early man would have done the same. Yet evolutionists want us to think that we descended from complete dolts.

Finally, science cannot tell us what we did last week let alone 2,000 years ago. How do they expect that they can say what took place 100,000,000 years ago or more/less? It is just ridiculous.

4. Evolution is clueless: it has been repeatedly said that evolution is a process, that it doesn’t know anything yet it was able to ‘guide’ all species through all environmental conditions until it found the right combination to allow life to exist unimpeded. It was also able to create diversity even though it has no clue what variety , creativity, and other characteristics found in life today, are.
This just stretches credibility way too far as there is no way it could come up with the function of each species and fit each role perfectly into life.

This is perpetuating the idea of ‘something from nothing’ as ‘the process’ has nothing yet it was able to produce everything from preferred diets, down to different colors.

5. Reproduction systems: Here is another vital life function that evolutionary adherents cannot explain why it exists. There is no reason why ‘the process’ would develop reproduction through sexual activity, there would be no need for it, nor concept that such a practice would be needed, nor can they explain why men need to have release more than women.
6. Morality: Another vital issue that evolutionists cannot explain. They may try to say it comes from a gene yet how did the gene ‘conceive of it’? or where did the gene receive the idea of morality or that it would be needed?
In evolution, where survival of the fittest is the key theme, morality plays no role for evolution is all about anarchy not moral behavior. Since evolution knows nothing, it is impossible for it to instill proper behavior in its resulting forms and it could not provide an ideal standard for its product to use as a guide.
At best, only animal instincts would reside in all species including humans, meaning that a Hitlerian attitude against the sick and weak would reign without competition from those who disagree.
7. Religious Issues: Evolution is not God and knows nothing thus the concept of God or even a god(s) would be absent from all humans. There would be no desire to find God and no reason to even think about superior beings because there would be no need for such hope.

With no concept of God, no guidance from a moral ideal, life on earth would just be one animal attacking another animal for its possessions. Since there would be no rules, then all is good and it wouldn’t matter what one person did to another, there would be no punishment for killing, raping and other crimes as there would be no definition of what a crime was.

Evolution doesn’t know anything thus it could not instill in its species any desire for a moral life for no one would know what morality was? With no concept of God or a god, there would be no religions whatsoever and no reminder of that one is living a less than stellar life. It would be total anarchy.

CONCLUSION:

It is clear that 'the process of evolution' has no idea that humans exist, does not care if they live or die and provides very little in the way of guidance and information to help people live better lives.

Yet many choose this path over someone who does care if they live or die, does know that they exist and does provide information to guide humans along with providing hope, love and eternal life after death, if they make the right choice.

Unfortunately, the adherents of 'the process' will reject this person because 1. the information comes in an ancient book; 2. provides little physical evidence; 3. doesn't put man at the top of the 'food chain'; 4. allows them free choice

Obviously, those who believe in God are not the ones chasing a fairy tale or being irrational but are making a better choice.


RESOURCES:

http://www.trueorigin.org/sex01.asp

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-definition.html

http://www.uncg.edu/psy/courses/calogan/438/content/ModelsBE.htm

http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Theory_of_evolution

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIE2aOriginoflife.shtml

http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/origin_and_evolution_of_earth_final.pdf

http://www.evolutionary-philosophy.net/sex.html

http://thankgodforevolution.com/blog/evolutionary-morality-and-ethics

http://www.accessexcellence.org/WN/SUA12/mammaldino598.php

http://www.twoorthree.net/2007/08/fossil-evidence.html

http://www.historyoftheuniverse.com/tl1.html

http://www.biblestudy.org/basicart/who-was-neanderthal-man-was-he-the-missing-link.html

http://www.iend.org/dad/dna.html



you fail, your points are undermined by your inherent underlying motives and your vast lack of knowledge or time to actually find out what evolution is.
I can't believe that there are still people who don't believe in evolution. I'm pretty sure even the Pope believes in evolution!
Reply 17
Senor Chong
I can't believe that there are still people who don't believe in evolution. I'm pretty sure even the Pope believes in evolution!


I don't believe in evolution, I believe in Zeus and the apostles.
Reply 18
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Denying Evolution is synonymous with denying Gravity.
These questions are only unanswerable because for the vast majority they make no sense. Don't think you're so special because you think you've figured out all the flaws in this theory. This was devised by one of the greatest brains ever to walk the planet, and is followed by an unbelievably overwhelming majority of (massively intelligent) scientists who've looked at the evidence for themselves and come to the same conclusion. This theory is beautiful and simple. Far more so than any Genesis or Creationist story.

Regarding your last point: Surely it's an evolutionary advantage not to be terrified of death? If we have faith then we have nothing to fear.
Reply 19
It's my opinion though. You don't see me criticising your opinions.

Latest

Trending

Trending