(Original post by The_0001)
If you actually read abit about Islam, you would understand that to be a Muslim, you must accept the Torah and Injeel(Bible) as Books from God
The Quran was sent down, because the previous Books have been distorted and thus redundant.
Let us look at the facts, as you insist. 1400 years ago, in Arabia, life expectancy was around 35-40, people aged over, were considered extremely healthy and blessed. They also matured early, an example being Osama Bin Zaid, a 17 year old who lead the Muslims to victory over the Romans. Another example, would be conquering Spain, which was done by teenagers. I think you undestand what i'm trying to say. Muhummad PBUH, married Ayesha, when she was 9. She gave consent, she wanted to marry him, they did not consumate their marriage until she was at the right age, even after she married, she didn't live with her husband, she lived with her mum and dad, until she was ready to move out. This was nothing new, nor amazing, it was a common occurence in Europe and Asia at the time, obviuously things have changed since then.
Your attack is against Muhummad is made even more weak when you look at the present day, people having sex with minors, European and American men moving to Asia where it is easy for them to molest children, these people can be attacked on a moral front, the same cannot be said about the Prophet Muhummad PBUH.
Again, your lack of knowledge of the history of Islam is making your argument even more pathetic. Muslims were being oppressed, and they did not fight back for many years, they were not even defending themselves after they were being attacked, this lead to the prophet having to Migrate to Yathrib. It was only many years later, where they were allowed to defend themselves, the conditions being that they had to be attacked first, and if it was severe enough that they had fallen to the ground. Even then, they could only hit back with blunt objects, so your argument of Muhummad being a warlord, is wholly incorrect.
You do, however, make a good point. Muslims are good people, it is a pillar of faith that they must give 2.5% of their wealth to the poor each year. You also make a valid point that Islam, is being portrayed negatively by extremists, you wouldn't judge a ferrari as being rubbish if the driver was a poor one, you would blame the driver, likewise, Islam isn't to be blamed here, extremists are.
Islam is the only true religion, as it is not just a religion, it is a way of life.