Edexcel Psychology exam tomorrow

I did criminal and child

Child=Easy
Criminal=Bit harder, few 'trick' questions as well, for example the field studies one if you arent careful you would have wrote about Yarmey instead of Yuille + Cutshall, and there was one where you had to write about another theory explaining criminal behaviour from 'a social or biological approach' and i of course thought this meant a theory from the approaches we learnt in AS

I know i so nearly wrote about Yarmey instead of Yuille and Cutshall I know a few people that did.
Did it not mean a theory from an approach from last year? I wrote about Eysenck from Biological.
I agree child wasn't too bad - no daycare, content analysis or written analysis

Yeahhh dont worry you were meant to write about Eysenk, its just me being stupid :P (well it would have been a bit easier if they phrased the question so it was less confusing IMO) but yeah i was hoping nothing on practical/NICHD EPPE/ Daycare came up for child, and Bowlby 12 marker was pretty nice i think

oh goodgood i was worried then.
I thought that question was really mean, the one about comparing the 2 explanations. I didn't know how SLT and Eysenck were similar and yeah i think i aced the Bowlby 12 mark I reeeeeally hope i got an A. But most people found it okay so i reckon the grade boundaries will be quite high

I wrote about YARMEY. How is that wrong