Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there! Sign in to have your say on this topicNew here? Join for free to post

Banning The Sun/Lads Mags from SU

Announcements Posted on
Applying to uni this year? Check out our new personal statement advice hub 28-11-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The feminist society at the LSE have submitted a proposal to ban The Sun and 'Lads Mags' from our Student Union shop.

    (Original post by The Feminists)
    We believe
    1.The homogenous representation of women’s bodies illustrated in FHM and the Sun is misogynistic.
    2.The images within both publications are heteronormative, in their assumptions of what constitutes ‘normal’ sexual relations.
    3.The images assume that women are sexually passive objects; and that relationships between men and women are equivalent to the relationship of predator and prey.
    4.The images are often airbrushed and encourage unrealistic and unattainable expectations of women’s bodies. Such expectations contribute to the proliference of eating disorders, and negative body image.
    5.Any industry which promotes the objectification of women inevitably has an impact on the sexist attitudes which underpin violence and sexual abuse, and as such cannot be said to be harmless fun.
    What do people think?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    its a SU not a working mans cafe, i'm not sure it's going to cause that big a stir if they were removed.

    but I also dont think feminism is as strong a cause it used to be.

    so I dont think anybody cares either way.
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I think there should be more gay mags out, and feministz suck lol they should get laid
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Why not vote to ban computers and laptops as well? No, instead lets stop publications which show a pair of tits. **** sake, these feminists will do anything to prove there current existence in 2010 is neccesary.
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Tell them to find something to whine about that people actually care about.

    Then ask them if they have done any research of the student body to see if The Sun has had a negative affect on them, or whether they have just sat down and pulled these conclusions out of their rusty vaginas. However logical they think their reasoning is of how The Sun and FHM is harming people, if they haven't got any evidence then their conclusions are completely worthless.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I'd tell you to shove your draconian censorship up your arse.

    This is from someone who's never even read any of those, never mind buys them on a regular basis.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Bloody Feminazi's. Twenty-first century man has totally subjugated 4 billion years of evolution and now, whenever he looks at a woman, sees only her inner beauty. People who read these publications are obviously throwbacks to a more primitive, superficial time.

    I'll read whatever I please and if it offends your sensibilities so be it.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?

    Two. One to change the bulb, and one to suck my nob.
    • 13 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    This is something I don't like about student unions. The issues they should be dealing with are student specific ones, not general political issues. Ok in this case it's actually a society proposing this which is fine I guess, as long as the SU doesn't give in.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Wouldn't it be better for their argument if they tried, nationally of course, to get The Sun to remove the page 3 pictures?

    Either way, I'm not really too bothered. I'm all for equality, but every feminist I know has just gone too far. Flip side though, I don't really read The Sun either.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Although, this made me lol:

    3.The images assume that women are sexually passive objects; and that relationships between men and women are equivalent to the relationship of predator and prey.
    Yeah, we're obviously hunting down women to kill them, rip their skin off, chew out all their muscle and leave them to rot in the wild. How is it predator and prey at all?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Men know women get airbrushed etc in mags, the same way they know most pornstars have fake tits and fannies more loose than a wizards sleeve, yet this doesn't discourage their appreciation for a normal womans body.

    A very fitting picture indeed:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    well shouldn't lse have a selection procedure so it prevents morons getting in? that will stop them having those magazines in the first place
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    This is actually ridiculous and pointless. For starters not that many guys buy them in the first place and even if they do it's mostly for a laugh. Only an idiot would expect all women to look like that and don't take it too seriously. Secondly even if you stop selling them there's only a billion zillion gillion squillion pictures of naked women online. They've even invented pictures of naked women that move, don't you know?!
    • 12 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    In terms of page 3 models they are choosing to take their top off.
    No man is grabbing them by the hair dragging across the room and physically forcing them to to do it.

    & in terms of airbrushing, should we ban the Christiano Ronaldo armani
    ad? Because he's been given a load of airbrusing, it may give off a false image of what men look like :rolleyes:
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Nosey freakin femmies reading Nuts over my shoulder. I think we should ban that too.
    • 84 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    If they have time for this jazz then LSE must not work their students as hard as I thought
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    @OP

    What a load of balls....
    • 8 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Why did the feminist cross the road?

    Spoiler:
    Show
    to SUCK my COCK
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    This happened at my Uni! They ended up not banning them, but putting them behind notices so you couldn't see the boobies!

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: February 4, 2010
New on TSR

Exclusive Nick Clegg interview

Your questions answered by the deputy prime minister

Article updates
Useful resources
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.