So the exam is going well. All the questions are easy and I finish in good time... or so I think.
See, the paper is divided into two sections. Naturally, the blank page within Section 1 would indicate the end of Section 1 and that you were to continue with either Part A, B, or C of Section 2. Indeed, the blank page stated "Turn over for...".
But no. Section 1 had not ended. There were 27 marks remaining behind the blank page that I missed out. I was looking to finish in good time so I overlooked the fact that the page indicated questions 4 and 5 and believed it was implying to move on to Section 2.
This is very unfair, in my opinion. The questions I missed were again, very easy and the section on Object Oriented Programming was what I knew the best! The front of the paper didn't even say how many questions were in Section 1 and other people missed the questions too.
Both our Computing Teachers sweared that someone would miss them out... and more than one of us did. Quite unbelievable when the two questions, 4 and 5, could individually fit onto a single page yet for some reason they shove a blinder before 4, completely concealing the questions.
I needed at least 70% to get an A. Missing out those questions means I'll only have had 9 marks leeway elsewhere. Now, the other questions were straight-forward but everyone makes a few mistakes somewhere. Two questions were difficult, deducting 5 marks from the 9 marks required. Thus I had 4 marks to spare on mistakes...
I'm not so sure whether those are 4 marks I had or 4 marks I lost.
Anyone else suffered from this?
I don't need my results this year for Uni, but I certainly will complain to SQA to ensure future papers are better structured and less deceptive.