The Student Room Group

In Defence of Creative Arts/Industries Degrees

Recently on this god-forsaken land of teenage ignorance a thread I created yonks ago about transferring from one uni course to another was bumped from obscurity and transformed into a an argument as to whether creative arts (in this particular case - media/film/drama) degree's were pointless.

I just thought that seen as I'm slightly bored and that I would attempt the frivolous task of explaining to the swarming masses who populate this forum and hail from the lands of my-daddy-is-a-doctor-so-i-want-to-be-one-too and I-want-a-zonda-so-I'm-going-into-investment-banking-even-though-it-bores-the-crap-out-of-me just WHY students such as myself - who could, feasibly be taking more "traditional" subjects choose not to in favour of the creative arts.

In regards to the common argument "you'll fail at life with a Ba Art/Film/Drama/Performance/Illustration/Creative Writing/Music Tech etc. etc..." - for us artsy types success isn't measured by the amount of windows on our big posh houses or the shiny newness of our cars compared to the surrey suburbanite jones' - it's about artistic integrity and challenging our personal and collective creativity in new and exciting endeavours which may or may not be about anything other than seeing if its possible.

And for the record....yes we are aware that becoming a 'famous' actor or director or artist or writer or musician is very very very rare and SHOCKINGLY we generally aren't trying to be the next big thing - most drama students wouldn't want to be cast in hollyoaks, most fine artists would probably cringe at being likened to Emin, not all writers want to be the "next JK" and not all musicians want to be popstars.

Then there's the ye olde point made that "you don't need a degree to be an artist" or the similar "you don't need to take a creative arts degree to be an artist" - that's right, you don't, and I accept that there are very many highly successful creative types who didn't study arts at HE and now have a shiny collection of awards for their work.

But just as for every thousand successful business graduates there's only one Alan Sugar - the same goes for artists and the main reason is that we need to be around out peers, and to be made to do things we don't necessarily want to do in order to be pushed and to experience who we are as artists. If an artist is left entirely alone, not subject to intelligent, informed criticism of their work they are in grave danger of never progressing, of becoming indulgent and repetitive and ignorant. The POINT of a Ba in the creative arts is not just to bestow specialist skills but also to challenge the individuals with those skills - to ask them "what's the point in creating that?" or "do you really think that's valid?" - otherwise we'd all just be creating the same type of finger paintings in our living rooms being perplexed when no-one wanted to give us £1500 a canvas.

In the same area - I'd also like to point out that in order to gain Ba status creative arts degrees do have to be highly theoretical as well as vocational and we do have to study a heck of a lot of theory in order to pass. If you consider what art is (a big philosophical question I know, but forgive me and my broad answer for now) - i.e. a reflection of its contemporary circumstances, that means that in order to study 'arts' you also have to study history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, economics, politics, international relations, business and many many other subjects dependent on the artefacts in question. In fact pursuing the creative arts at HE in the UK is probably one of the best ways to get a thoroughly rounded education (with, admittedly the exception of most sciences - but not all, as there will always be elements of physics, chemistry, biology and especially engineering to be found in our degrees).

Another point which often comes up is that "you're buggered for grad jobs" - well actually, we aren't. The intake for the Advertising/Marketing/PR industry - ya know that multi billion pound global entity, is most certainly made up of quite a large number of creative arts graduates (I mean - where else would they find their 'creatives'?). There's also jobs in the media which are especially suited to people who've studied the industry and its history. Even in seemingly 'unrelated' areas such as banking and asset management arts graduates are actively sought - a large finance company advertises in my department (Drama - their ad's are all 'take centre stage' - and they, themselves have nothing to do with the theatre/film industry) - I'll get the name this week for those who will go "PROOF" at me - don't worry. And a girl who's graduating this year has a job lined up with the Blackhorse group. Generally arts graduates (particularly performance) have to learn exceptional communication and business skills in order to produce good work - we HAVE to be people people because the arts are so dependent on the creator-consumer relationship (and also because of the amount of time we have to spend negotiating our creative ideas). We're also highly competitive and therefore have to learn such things as persuasive techniques early on in our courses - we're taught to prepare for the "real world" and encouraged to look at the vast amount of jobs available to us.

Which brings me to my last point - the creative industries is one of the fastest growing sectors of the global economy. Our world is propelled by media and entertainment. Where do you think all the millions of people who put together all the creative stuff - a la tv, film, music, web, adverts, radio etc. etc. come from? Have you ever wondered why the credits on a film take so long to roll? That's because THOUSANDS of people can be needed to make just one film - not including those who were left unlisted, or why galleries are constantly updating their collections and new exhibits pop up every day - because there are THOUSANDS of artists creating new and valid work, why bookstores and libraries are so huge - why there's so much choice in music, why there's no list of all the contributors in magazines and web content- because if they put together all of the photographers/designers/illustrators/writers/researchers involved and tried to print it there just wouldn't be room....same for the music industry - its not just commercial tracks that have hundreds of people backing them up, there's also thousands of session musicians and pit musicians working in the uk - the people who write and produce the music for tv/film/web content. The way most people learn about the world (about the state of the financial industries or new developments in science for example) - through documentaries/news bulletins/newspapers/radio/web are all propelled by creatives.
Creative arts graduates are a massive part of the uk economy. We are also a massive part of our future cultural integrity - if we just all decided to do "more sensible" degrees I sincerely doubt the world would be a better place - unless an Orwellian nightmare is your vision of paradise.
Reply 1
Woww :smile: that made so much sense im sorry mine isnt as long xD, but it is true i get looked down on because im going to do Photography in september.
Reply 2
As someone who has actively worked in the creative sector, specifically graphic design, and has done so for some time now, I can safely say that regarding you're determined and dedicated, you can realistically establish a respectable career, both for personal fulfillment (which is what most in this area aspire for) and, surprise surprise, salary too (once you've accumulated the necessary amount of experience). Obviously, the creative sector is large and will differ considerably depending on the area you're intending to pursue, but generally the aforementioned is applicable to all. Moreover, competence in your craft and an understanding of the industry you're entering will determine whether you're ready to work professionally and ultimately at a senior level down the road.

Edit:

Regarding this forum, I wouldn't invest too much energy in trying to enlighten those who are ignorant of the creative sector and what it entails, nor the academia that precedes it. There is such a thing as adamant ignorance, mainly to justify their own area, but also because it's the internet. There's little gain in defending or justifying your chosen route. My best advice is to ignore them. :smile:
Aiko

Regarding this forum, I wouldn't invest too much energy in trying to enlighten those who are ignorant of the creative sector and what it entails, nor the academia that precedes it. There is such a thing as adamant ignorance, mainly to justify their own area, but also because it's the internet. There's little gain in defending or justifying your chosen route. My best advice is to ignore them. :smile:


You're right I know - just sometimes I feel like getting one of those plastic bopping mallet things and seeking them out in real life.
:o:
*subscribes to read later.
Marlene Dietrich
Recently on this god-forsaken land of teenage ignorance a thread I created yonks ago about transferring from one uni course to another was bumped from obscurity and transformed into a an argument as to whether creative arts (in this particular case - media/film/drama) degree's were pointless.

I just thought that seen as I'm slightly bored and that I would attempt the frivolous task of explaining to the swarming masses who populate this forum and hail from the lands of my-daddy-is-a-doctor-so-i-want-to-be-one-too and I-want-a-zonda-so-I'm-going-into-investment-banking-even-though-it-bores-the-crap-out-of-me just WHY students such as myself - who could, feasibly be taking more "traditional" subjects choose not to in favour of the creative arts.

In regards to the common argument "you'll fail at life with a Ba Art/Film/Drama/Performance/Illustration/Creative Writing/Music Tech etc. etc..." - for us artsy types success isn't measured by the amount of windows on our big posh houses or the shiny newness of our cars compared to the surrey suburbanite jones' - it's about artistic integrity and challenging our personal and collective creativity in new and exciting endeavours which may or may not be about anything other than seeing if its possible.

And for the record....yes we are aware that becoming a 'famous' actor or director or artist or writer or musician is very very very rare and SHOCKINGLY we generally aren't trying to be the next big thing - most drama students wouldn't want to be cast in hollyoaks, most fine artists would probably cringe at being likened to Emin, not all writers want to be the "next JK" and not all musicians want to be popstars.

Then there's the ye olde point made that "you don't need a degree to be an artist" or the similar "you don't need to take a creative arts degree to be an artist" - that's right, you don't, and I accept that there are very many highly successful creative types who didn't study arts at HE and now have a shiny collection of awards for their work.

But just as for every thousand successful business graduates there's only one Alan Sugar - the same goes for artists and the main reason is that we need to be around out peers, and to be made to do things we don't necessarily want to do in order to be pushed and to experience who we are as artists. If an artist is left entirely alone, not subject to intelligent, informed criticism of their work they are in grave danger of never progressing, of becoming indulgent and repetitive and ignorant. The POINT of a Ba in the creative arts is not just to bestow specialist skills but also to challenge the individuals with those skills - to ask them "what's the point in creating that?" or "do you really think that's valid?" - otherwise we'd all just be creating the same type of finger paintings in our living rooms being perplexed when no-one wanted to give us £1500 a canvas.

In the same area - I'd also like to point out that in order to gain Ba status creative arts degrees do have to be highly theoretical as well as vocational and we do have to study a heck of a lot of theory in order to pass. If you consider what art is (a big philosophical question I know, but forgive me and my broad answer for now) - i.e. a reflection of its contemporary circumstances, that means that in order to study 'arts' you also have to study history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, economics, politics, international relations, business and many many other subjects dependent on the artefacts in question. In fact pursuing the creative arts at HE in the UK is probably one of the best ways to get a thoroughly rounded education (with, admittedly the exception of most sciences - but not all, as there will always be elements of physics, chemistry, biology and especially engineering to be found in our degrees).

Another point which often comes up is that "you're buggered for grad jobs" - well actually, we aren't. The intake for the Advertising/Marketing/PR industry - ya know that multi billion pound global entity, is most certainly made up of quite a large number of creative arts graduates (I mean - where else would they find their 'creatives'?). There's also jobs in the media which are especially suited to people who've studied the industry and its history. Even in seemingly 'unrelated' areas such as banking and asset management arts graduates are actively sought - a large finance company advertises in my department (Drama - their ad's are all 'take centre stage' - and they, themselves have nothing to do with the theatre/film industry) - I'll get the name this week for those who will go "PROOF" at me - don't worry. And a girl who's graduating this year has a job lined up with the Blackhorse group. Generally arts graduates (particularly performance) have to learn exceptional communication and business skills in order to produce good work - we HAVE to be people people because the arts are so dependent on the creator-consumer relationship (and also because of the amount of time we have to spend negotiating our creative ideas). We're also highly competitive and therefore have to learn such things as persuasive techniques early on in our courses - we're taught to prepare for the "real world" and encouraged to look at the vast amount of jobs available to us.

Which brings me to my last point - the creative industries is one of the fastest growing sectors of the global economy. Our world is propelled by media and entertainment. Where do you think all the millions of people who put together all the creative stuff - a la tv, film, music, web, adverts, radio etc. etc. come from? Have you ever wondered why the credits on a film take so long to roll? That's because THOUSANDS of people can be needed to make just one film - not including those who were left unlisted, or why galleries are constantly updating their collections and new exhibits pop up every day - because there are THOUSANDS of artists creating new and valid work, why bookstores and libraries are so huge - why there's so much choice in music, why there's no list of all the contributors in magazines and web content- because if they put together all of the photographers/designers/illustrators/writers/researchers involved and tried to print it there just wouldn't be room....same for the music industry - its not just commercial tracks that have hundreds of people backing them up, there's also thousands of session musicians and pit musicians working in the uk - the people who write and produce the music for tv/film/web content. The way most people learn about the world (about the state of the financial industries or new developments in science for example) - through documentaries/news bulletins/newspapers/radio/web are all propelled by creatives.
Creative arts graduates are a massive part of the uk economy. We are also a massive part of our future cultural integrity - if we just all decided to do "more sensible" degrees I sincerely doubt the world would be a better place - unless an Orwellian nightmare is your vision of paradise.


AGREED!! :yep:

Finally someone with complete sence on this god-forsaken land of teenage ignorance.

There are too many snobby, stupid, stuck up, unrealistic, delusional, arrogant, narrowminded, bigoted 'my-daddy-is-a-doctor-so-i-want-to-be-one-too' and 'I-want-a-zonda-so-I'm-going-into-investment-banking-even-though-it-bores-the-crap-out-of-me' types on TSR :mad: who'd rather conform to these kind of 'don't do this subject, do that subject because you get a fantastic job, car and house straight out of uni', rather than follow their individual talents, and its so refresing to read everything you said now.:smile:

Btw I am not even gonna study creative art as I am not an artist at all but I really think that everything you have said makes perfect sence. :biggrin:
Also just to add I would not listen to what the majority of people of TSR say anyway as a lot them are ignorant, so just ignore them. That what I do as I never think that their threads or posts are worthy of my reading time. Go ahead and study what the heck you want wherever you want no matter what anyone says, whether it's creative arts, sciences, humanities, social sciences, etc (and this applies to anyone). Like I said in my last post I wont be applying to study creative arts cos tbh I am really rubbish at art (I didn't take it for GCSE or A Level) but what right does anyone including myself have to criticise somebody for chosing to study creative arts?
Anyone else scan-read the thread title as 'Defence Against the Dark Arts'? :|
Dee Leigh
AGREED!! :yep:

Finally someone with complete sence on this god-forsaken land of teenage ignorance.

There are too many snobby, stupid, stuck up, unrealistic, delusional, arrogant, narrowminded, bigoted 'my-daddy-is-a-doctor-so-i-want-to-be-one-too' and 'I-want-a-zonda-so-I'm-going-into-investment-banking-even-though-it-bores-the-crap-out-of-me' types on TSR :mad: who'd rather conform to these kind of 'don't do this subject, do that subject because you get a fantastic job, car and house straight out of uni', rather than follow their individual talents, and its so refresing to read everything you said now.:smile:

Btw I am not even gonna study creative art as I am not an artist at all but I really think that everything you have said makes perfect sence. :biggrin:


:ta: ....:biggrin:
Reply 9
You can't take 99.99% of TSR members seriously.

OP, your thread was a very interesting read. I wholly agree :smile:
lella_m
You can't take 99.99% of TSR members seriously.

OP, your thread was a very interesting read. I wholly agree :smile:

Thanks m'dearie :biggrin:
MissFanatical
Anyone else scan-read the thread title as 'Defence Against the Dark Arts'? :|


HAH! Just saw this post....made me giggle muchly ....and do this: :ninja:
Can you write a TL;DR version please. I should be revising.
MasterJomi
Can you write a TL;DR version please. I should be revising.


Sorry - being verbose comes with the territory :o:
Fantastic rant/post - I totally agree!
Creativity is extremely important, and the Media sector is huge in this era, so more and more creative individuals are sought.
Unfortunately, there will always be ignorance towards the Creative Arts - probably as so many people don't actually realise what it involves.
Reply 15
DarkShadows
Fantastic rant/post - I totally agree!
Creativity is extremely important, and the Media sector is huge in this era, so more and more creative individuals are sought.
Unfortunately, there will always be ignorance towards the Creative Arts - probably as so many people don't actually realise what it involves.

I agree people kept saying i was was doing my course as a cop out because i couldn't do a proper subject.
and now im going to uni in september and they still think that, what i dont think they realise is how much of everything around them is done by the creative arts.
It's sad really
Creative Arts and Technology are actually really closely linked as well - so Art is becoming more technical, to an extent.
And as mentioned in the initial rant, Art and Design students have to learn a lot - History, Sociology, Pyschology, Politics, Business (amongst many more). Though a lot of practical work is involved, there is much theory and 'academic' practice as well.
So, consequently, Creative Arts students do have a lot to offer.

I always get told that my course isn't 'academic' or is 'useless'; but I'm passionate about what I do, and strive to learn new things and develop my creativity. If your passionate and ejoy a certain subject, then it likely you'll succeed in what you want to do.
I completely agree, practically everything around us is created by the creative industries. I always get told by people that doing art is pointless and i'll never get paid a lot but I don't really mind if i'm not living in luxury after uni, I just want to have a job where I love what I do =)
Kai Hiwatari
I completely agree, practically everything around us is created by the creative industries. I always get told by people that doing art is pointless and i'll never get paid a lot but I don't really mind if i'm not living in luxury after uni, I just want to have a job where I love what I do =)



Yup - "I'm an artist" trumps pretty much any material good. I mean, as they say, you can't take it with you - and as far as I'm concerned I'd rather have spent my life making people think then making money. :o: - but as Aiko said, it is certainly possible to earn a very decent wage as a creative type....so we potentially get the best of both!

Latest