M19 - Response to Events in Iran
TSR's model parliament.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
Re: M19 - Response to Events in Iran
Well yes, and no. If we're to demand weapons inspectors in every 6 months, then why do we need to dismantle the nuclear program. I know this sounds far-fetched, but what if they *are* telling the truth? Certainly we shouldn't be stopping people from using nuclear power and the weapons inspectors are there to make sure that they do not use this capability for weapons.
If they refuse weapons inspectors into the country, then that is a different matter, but if we have people there making sure it is not for arms then I see no reason that they should have to dismantle nuclear operations for peaceful purposes, if indeed that is their aim. -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in IranLEAVE THE COUNTRY ALONE! It hasn't invaded a country in over 300 years and hasn't ONCE gone against the non-proliferation treaty!(Original post by Metrobeans)
What the hell is your problem, and the "wipe Israel of the map" has been debunked, go get a friend or something !
-
Re: M19 - Response to Events in IranThis paragraph contains too many weasel words.(Original post by TSR Conservative)
Should Iran choose to ignore this House, and continue with its nuclear program, then we shall not fail or falter, we shall not weaken or tire in our responsibility to defend the United Kingdom and her allies from the grave and terrible threat of a Nuclear armed Iran.
Should Iran choose to ignore this house, what exactly are you going to do about it? -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in Iran
I would like to say that this would be good to send to the MUN for discussion and is a good way to involve both groups.
With regards to the Motion:
Didn't we have this over Iraq? They are building weapons, they have weapons etc. If Iran wants nuclear power, let it we have no right to interfere. However, if it wants a weapon, consider the reality. Any attempt to fire one bomb would result in MAD and the destruction of Iran. Iran has far more to lose than to gain from nuclear weapons. They're mad, but not that mad.... -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in Iran
While I agree with the sentiments of this Motion in calling for Iran to be more open about its nuclear program and meet its obligations under the NPT, it's far too simplistic for my liking.
For example, who are "United Nations weapons inspectors"? A very vague term which I think incorrectly assumes that the International Atomic Energy Agency is part of the UN.
- Are the TSR Conservatives really suggesting that Iran will nuke Iraq and/or Afghanistan?Furthermore, we fear that Iran's nuclear program will be not, as stated, be used for merely peaceful efforts, but rather the development of nuclear weapons for use against our soldiers in the middle eastern front as well as our allies in the region.
Who are "our allies" exactly? And how do you know whoever they are agree with you?Therefore, this House, along with our allies, demands that Iran immediately begin ending its nuclear program by dismantling its nuclear processing facilities.
There is also one glaring omission that has been completely ignored in this Motion - Israel. Would the TSR Conservatives explain their stance on this elephant in the room? -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in Iran
Have the TSR tories asked if the MUN rep for the allies (as the term is used in this motion) countries will support this? Remember that the HoCs actions may effect our international appearance? The MHoC is not the UK in the MUN! A country may be RL allies, but we could move ourselves into any block of allies we want. Maybe speaking for other countries wouldnt be good at the moment.
-
Re: M19 - Response to Events in Iran
So far Iran have no actually openly threatend the west. Whether they do or don't have the capacity to make nuclear weapons doesn't matter. They have not threatend either the UK or the USA.
The fact that they have threatend Israel is none of our business.
Furthermore if Iran did try to start a war with Israel, the latter would well and truly wipe the floor with former.
All this hype about Iran is just that, hype.
If Iran wanted to flaunt their nuclear weapons they would.
If they wanted to threaten the US and UK they would, openly.
But they haven't.
So I think we should all just cool our boots. -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in IranSorry, but why in the name of the Good Lord above are you wittering on about Israel. I'm pretty certain they aren't going to Nuke us.(Original post by Student2806)
There is also one glaring omission that has been completely ignored in this Motion - Israel. Would the TSR Conservatives explain their stance on this elephant in the room? -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in IranWell there is no argument in what he's saying in that case. Israel is a liberal and democratic nation that has never desired to make war on us. Iran is a theocracy run by nutters who, or at least some, believe that nuking the west will take them closer to Allah.(Original post by xXedixXx)
I think what he's getting at is why is there one rule for some and another rule for others? -
Re: M19 - Response to Events in IranHas any Iranian official made this claim?(Original post by adamrules247)
Well there is no argument in what he's saying in that case. Israel is a liberal and democratic nation that has never desired to make war on us. Iran is a theocracy run by nutters who, or at least some, believe that nuking the west will take them closer to Allah.
As for Israel ,making no threats regarding a possible strike on us, that is not true. As shown below.
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
- Martin van Creveld, Israeli military strategist, 2003.Last edited by Iron Mike; 16-08-2010 at 14:09.