part 2...
Further details are provided below.
6. Due to my complaints of racial segregation, racial discrimination, harassment, bullying and institutional racism, I suffered victimisation from members of the management team. My protected acts are as follows:
a) In 2002 I protested to Gavin Brown that my application for the MBBS 5 had been rejected in order to channel me onto the experimental EMDP course.
b) In 2002-2003 I made complaints to Dr Pamela Garlick and Professor Standring about the segregated nature of the EMDP course and asked to be transferred to the MBBS5 course.
c) In 2005 I made a complaint to the college of harassment and bullying by Richard Pinder who was my clinical partner at the time. I asked to be moved away from him.
d) On 2 December 2006, I submitted a written complaint of harassment and bullying against ***** *****, Steve Dixon and Simon Hill. I made a verbal complaint to staff indicating that the harassment was racially motivated.
e) On 19 September 2007 I made a complaint to the Dean of Victoria Hospital (St Lucia), and the Elective Coordinator against Alexis Johnson, Johanne Adley, Jaskiren Kaur, Emon Malik and Sivathatishana Meinerikandathevan for assault, bullying, harassment and breach of contract.
f) On 9 September 2007, I sent Emon Malik a ‘letter of claim’.
g) 24 September 2008, I submitted a claim at the Employment Tribunal.
h) 21 November 2008, I submitted a claim for discrimination at the Central London County Court (8CL09060) which was lost on the court system.
i) 23 December 2008, I submitted a replacement claim at the Central London County Court (which was returned as permission was needed to serve on the defendant’s Solicitor)
j) On 28 January 2008, I submitted the claim for racial discrimination at the Central London County Court (9CL00753)
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
7. In November 2001, I submitted my UCAS application form for the MBBS 5 year programme (I refer to the UCAS application; marked exhibit 4). The entrance requirements were advertised in the prospectus as ‘ABB’ at A- level, based upon a tariff point system. My predicted grades were ‘AAC’ at A level. I took up and sat an additional AS level in English Literature during my final year for which I had no predicted grade (I refer to the interview form 2002-2003 for Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ (GKT) School of Medicine 2002/2003 entry; marked exhibit 5,).
8. The entry requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MB BS) may be satisfied by obtaining passes in at least three subjects at A Level and one at AS level in the General Certificate of Education examinations, at grades to be determined by the School of Medicine. (I refer to the KCL Regulations for the Degrees of Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MB BS) new and old curriculum dated June 2006, referred to as exhibit 6).
9. During my A level’s at Lambeth College, I also studied for the ‘Key Skills’- a new programme introduced at Lambeth College and other Colleges nation wide. I had also obtained work experience with a GP practice and carried out voluntary work at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital. In addition, I had numerous sports awards, for swimming and rowing competitions.
10. On 29 April 2002, I was interviewed for the 6 year EMDP programme by Professor Standring (white) and Gavin Brown (white) (I refer to GKT interview form 2002/2003; marked exhibit 5). On the day of my interview for the EMDP Programme, I was provided with a leaflet which had been produced by KCL advertising the ‘Access to Medicine Programme’. This course was neither advertised in the KCL prospectus, nor by Lambeth College where I studied. It stated that ‘students who are predicted ABB or better at A level should not apply for the Access to Medicine Programme – they are eligible for our five-year MBBS programme…..’. I had correctly applied for the MBBS5 course but I was called for interview for the EMDP course. Also, students applying for the EMDP course were not permitted to apply for the MBBS at other universities or at KCL. The EMDP used Personal qualities Assessment to admit candidates on potential as well as achievement which did not apply to standard MBBS candidates. (I refer to the leaflet: ‘KCL Access to Medicine Programme’; marked exhibit 7 and KCL ‘ACCESS AGREEMENT SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE FOR FAIR ACCESS (OFFA), marked exhibit 8).
11. As a students on the EMDP course, Lambeth College would have been required to provide an ‘additional detailed reference’ for me. (I refer to the Department of Health (DoH) document, page 13, marked exhibit 9). Unlike standard MBBS students the EMDP students had ‘widening participation statistics’ kept on their ‘student file’. This included information about my parents. (I refer to the document ‘WHAT IS A STUDENT RECORD? A case study by King’s college London, dated November 2003, marked exhibit 10). Following my formal complaint against Dr Bradbeer, I was informed by Hannah Sewell that Dr Bradbeer had recorded on my student file that she had referred me to the HIV/STD clinic and that it would be deleted.