Just look at the RIDICULOUS amount of students getting A's for A level with AQA (brought to attention by some random guys rant):
http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/stat_pdf/AQA-A-LEVEL-STATS-JUNE10.PDFThe average is virtually 31% A*/A nationally. In private schools and grammar schools, it is most likely 50-60% A*/A.
Chemistry is said to be amongst the hardest of subjects, yet almost 50% of all entries get an A. That worries me. Just imagine what the figure is for students who actually 'try' at that subject...it must be around 65-70% who get A's minimum.
A recent study has shown that a C grader in 1980's would get a grade A today. If you can find the source, please throw it over because I can't find it.
I am going to an Ivy League uni in US after getting 4 A's and I feel that I am one of the minority who deserve these grades because I did NO resits. I also had to do some admissions tests to get into this uni, yet there are 'A graders' who have re-sat their way to getting A's without doing any admissions tests who are going to uni's like UCL, Warwick, Durham etc.
How universities SHOULD respond to the grades boom:
1. BAN AS RESITS! I find naturally Mid B students getting mid B's for AS level and transforming these into high A's, meaning they can just be their typical mid B grade self to get a grade A overall. Come on. And it's so easy to get a B grade these days if you study.
2. High A/A* = new grade A The difference between an A and full marks is 120 UCAS points I think, that's bloody huge. They should make a 'high A' or even an A* the new grade A.
3. Exams set at the end of the two years. 4. Make students THINK: Actually make exams less about 'practice makes perfect' and make students actually THINK creatively. We shouldn't be taught 'to' something.
5. Make harder exams...simple i.e higher proportion of 'harder questions' and don't offer marks for things that used to be offered marks i.e a 12 mark essay...4 marks for intro and basic content. Scrap these rewarding marks and
expect an intro and basic content.
6. Less time to answer questions in exams. Yeah, even for history students.
7. Stop publication of past-papers. Exam technique shoots virtually anybody into success.
8. IQ/Aptitude tests to apply to universities, kind of like the UKCAT system employed by universities for medical/dental school applicants.
You generally need great aptitude scores to get into top jobs anyways i.e banking, consulting, accounting, law, dent, med, finance etc.
Colleges should not offer any aptitude test help.
9. Make students do MORE A levels. AAA for Oxbridge is a JOKE. They have bunked their entry requirements up to A*AA this year ,but I think they should make it mandatory to do 4-5 A levels MINIMUM.
Typical AAB universities should make it mandatory to get AAAB now. AAB 5-6 years ago is probably the equivalent to 4A's now.
10. Universities should become GCSE nazi's. I am fully defending Birmingham's 7A*+ requirement at GCSE to be an eligible applicant for their med school.
11. Ban scholarships. There's some dude who got ACC 2 years ago who is doing Medicine just because he represents England for some sport. Fair enough if he was very ill or something so couldn't study during his A levels, but ACC being fully fit to the extent that he has 1. enough time to study for his A levels and 2. Fit enough to represent England in sport. Wow, just wow.
12. There should be interviews for more subjects by universities. Any other you can think of?
Note: These are just mere SUGGESTIONS. You don't have to turn into an examiner + interrogator, scrutinising me.
Doing some of the above will ensure students from Cambridge, Warwick, Durham, Imperial etc. are worthy of being Cambridge, Warwick, Durham, Imperial etc. students.