I'm just about to write an essay on the pros and cons of written and unwritten (or codified and uncodified) constitution for A2 US/UK Comparative politics. Then I thought I might attempt to get you guys to write it for me (is that awfull presumptious? Probably). It seems that a democracy can survive without a written constitution, as the UK does. But at what cost? Americans know their constitution, and as a result know their rights. I'm not so sure the same can be said for the British.
Then again we can change our constitution to suit society, while in the US due to their codified constitution and the amendment process, this is much more difficult. Which is more beneficial? Perhaps the US has a better safeguard against radical legislation.
Please post all thoughts. Thank-you essay writers.