The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Billy Pilgrim
But, alas, that is the paradox of capitalism! Capitalists always argue that their system is somehow fairer because you get out what you put in. However, this is simply not true. The entire system is built on the exploitation of those at the bottom, who work hardest in order to pad the pockets of the owners of the means of production at the top, who contribute comparatively very little to the system. Those that work hardest, in the most vital jobs, get paid the least; the workers in the factories, the social workers, the nurses - without whom the entire system would collapse. Talk about hypocritical...

capitalism works in reality and creates growth communism doesnt
.Ali.
Not true at all. You have to be more educated to do the jobs at the top, they're more mentally demanding, hence it being fairer. In capitalism, at least we have the chance of being rich or poor. Also, people are inequal, so making it equal a) wouldn't work, and b) would damage the economy so severely.


But it's a vicious circle is it not? To be educated you need to be wealthy, and so those at the bottom cannot escape the giant wheel they are perpetually pushing. Clearly, in recent years, a more socialist method of financing education has been put in place, lessening this effect - however, now that the cap is off, I fear we'll be returning to the dark ages once again.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 22
Billy Pilgrim
But it's a vicious circle is it not? To be educated you need to be wealthy, and so those at the bottom cannot escape the giant wheel they are perpetually pushing. Clearly, in recent years, a more socialist method of financing education has been put in place, lessening this effect - however, now that the cap is off, I fear we'll be returning to the dark ages once again.


We have state schools and student loans, so no you don't. However, the intelligent tend to be wealthy, and thus have more intelligent children, as it has links to genetics. The less intelligent tend to get more mundane jobs, and have lesser intelligent children, who get mundane jobs etc.

Everyone is different, some just aren't cut out for university, for example, so that doesn't work. Capitalism works.
Reply 23
Billy Pilgrim
Your literary prowess precedes you.

Cheers blad
.Ali.
We have state schools and student loans, so no you don't. However, the intelligent tend to be wealthy, and thus have more intelligent children, as it has links to genetics. The less intelligent tend to get more mundane jobs, and have lesser intelligent children, who get mundane jobs etc.

Everyone is different, some just aren't cut out for university, for example, so that doesn't work. Capitalism works.


:facepalm: I'm afraid I can no longer continue a debate with someone as bigoted and ignorant as yourself.
Don't so naive, cuts are falling pretty much everywhere. On the police (my dad handles the legal side of the local police force, he might lose his job), schools, social care, armed forces as well as the civil service.

Millions of real people are going to take a kicking from these cuts, stop pretending it doesn't matter. Maybe you're safe, rich and have no need for state provided help... a lot of people aren't so lucky.

I'm not a raging socialist by any means, but the privileged and well-off people on here rabbiting on about how those at the top deserve it, for being "mentally superior" make me laugh. You've been born into immense privilege, how dare you judge a single mum scraping every £ to get by? Conservatives make me sick.
Reply 26
Billy Pilgrim
:facepalm: I'm afraid I can no longer continue a debate with someone as bigoted and ignorant as yourself.

How is that ignorant and bigoted? Saying the more intelligent will get better jobs, and their children will be more intelligent as it has links to genetics? That's the truth...
:cookie:
Reply 28
FyreFight
this is what marxists actually believe

What the hell are they?:confused:
Reply 29
kashim91
What the hell are they?:confused:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism is what they are.
Reply 30
Wolfos

I like to know what other people's definitions of words are, rather than checking wikipedia, which is often vague and confusing. But thanks anyway:yep:
Megaross
Lets see, my mum, public sector worker, research council. Low priority in public spending so she's fearing for her job.
The company my dad works for gets a lot of it's business from council contracts, they are a quality based company, without those council contracts they have no major reason to stay open in the UK and will probably end up setting up shop in europe and focusing on amercia. Another good manufacturing firm destroy by tory idiocy.

I don't believe the state owes me a living
, ask anyone on this forum, I think as soon as you're 16 you should take responsibility, get a job and stop taking your parents money. I work more hours a week on average than most full time workers, with a chronic pain problem. And still attend full time education.
I believe our government owes the people a duty of care, they are only looking at the monetary side of things and booming in without a care in the world about the people, the mass disruption and destruction of peoples lives they will cause.

As usual with the tories, they think everyone has money in the bank, my parents certainly don't. They've worked hard to buy their own house and support my sister and me growing up. When I was a right little kid they were both working 70 hours a week to make ends meet. And they don't have a lot in life, an average house and a couple of run down old cars, in debt, savings depleted from all the crap thats happened and now my mum is very likely to lose her job, my dad has a chance of losing his job too.

******* tory scum, people forget to soon. Thatcher 2.0, they ****** my family last time and they're doing it again.


You don't believe they owe you a living, but if they won't use the services of the company your dad works for they're scum?
Billy Pilgrim
But it's a vicious circle is it not? To be educated you need to be wealthy, and so those at the bottom cannot escape the giant wheel they are perpetually pushing.


That's not true, to be educated you need to study. To be well educated, you are statistically more likely to have to come from a wealthier background, but that does not mean you have to be wealthy to be well educated.



Clearly, in recent years, a more socialist method of financing education has been put in place, lessening this effect - however, now that the cap is off, I fear we'll be returning to the dark ages once again.


Moving from free tuition to 3k fees is not a more socialist method at all :confused:

The "dark ages" you are talking about are the days when people got free university education, and when a university education meant you were in high demand. These days, a university education costs you 30k, and because of this ridiculous '50% in higher education NuLab' target, graduates are no longer as valuable as they once were.
How is that ignorant and bigoted? Saying the more intelligent will get better jobs, and their children will be more intelligent as it has links to genetics? That's the truth...


People who work hard get better jobs than those who are just intelligent.

And it's much easier to get a job with 'contacts' which people of a higher class will have more of. Which means that jobs will not necessarily be given to those best at it as others who have these 'contacts' will be given preference.

Just one of many examples.
kashim91
I like to know what other people's definitions of words are, rather than checking wikipedia, which is often vague and confusing. But thanks anyway:yep:


Marxists believe that society organically decays through different stages. We begin with primitive communism, people trading x for y, then progress into feudalism, as one military power takes over another and uses their workforce as slaves, hence creating the first class divide - with a sea of serfs working for an autocrat at the top.

However, a middle class, the bourgeoisie, soon begins to emerge as the economy becomes increasingly industrial, and soon overthrows the autocrat at the top - giving birth to capitalism. Capitalism is essentially a greedy and unstable economic system, based on the suppression and exploitation of the proletariat (working classes), who effectively (and unknowingly) hold up the entire system. When the proletariat realize this, Marx hypothesizes, they will be a force of incredible political power, who will overthrow the bourgeoisie, finally leading to an equal, idealistic society in which everybody gets out what they put in.

Marx was a nineteenth Century philosopher by the way.
(edited 13 years ago)
Indievertigo
Moving from free tuition to 3k fees is not a more socialist method at all :confused:

The "dark ages" you are talking about are the days when people got free university education, and when a university education meant you were in high demand. These days, a university education costs you 30k, and because of this ridiculous '50% in higher education NuLab' target, graduates are no longer as valuable as they once were.


Naturally the introduction of free universities would fall under the socialist education system I was referring to. However, you must remember that when such a system was in place, the top universities were populated mainly by private schooled pupils as the state of secondary schooling in deprived areas was, quite frankly, diabolical (and still is, some may argue). Indeed, many who grow up in poor areas experience a very different culture to those from privileged backgrounds - one in which the importance of education is never emphasized, and the social expectation is that one will turn 16 and "go down the mine", so to speak.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 36
perrytheplatypus
People who work hard get better jobs than those who are just intelligent.

And it's much easier to get a job with 'contacts' which people of a higher class will have more of. Which means that jobs will not necessarily be given to those best at it as others who have these 'contacts' will be given preference.

Just one of many examples.


Well it's a combination of both, obviously you will need to work hard, yes.

They have to be competant at the job though, so on the whole (yes, I do acknowledge there will be exceptions!), the more intelligent do better.

Also, if someone loses out because of that, it may happen once, but I doubt it would happen at every single interview they went to.
Well it's a combination of both, obviously you will need to work hard, yes.

They have to be competant at the job though, so on the whole (yes, I do acknowledge there will be exceptions!), the more intelligent do better.

Also, if someone loses out because of that, it may happen once, but I doubt it would happen at every single interview they went to.


Every single person I know who left education at 16 and is doing an apprentership or found a job in the in the finance sector, etc did it through contacts. And I'm sure there would have been people much more able out there for the task.

Believe it or not, at the end of the day someone less able than you will get the job because their aunty's friend's brother's mum's niece's kid happens to work there too.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 38
.Ali.
People should get what they work for, wealth shouldn't be greatly distributed.


If that was the case, then people at the top of business structures would still be paid the same as those who are at the bottom. THey practically work the same hours and put the same amount of effort.

I also think you misunderstood what the point the person you quoted was making. The point the poster you quoted made, was that in the past it was the working class which made Britain what it was today, adn they were never given what they worked for, it was taken from them from the higher classes. This work the lower classes did, is what made Britain the rich and developed country it is today. Thus in today's society there should be some payback. (this is his arguement, not sure if I'd entirely agree).
Billy Pilgrim
I would rather the wealth which has been generated through the sweat and toil of many of the poorest members of our society was spread around so that all may profit from their labour.



A wise man hypocrite was our Karl.


Corrected for accuracy.

A man who spent his entire life living off handouts from his German Aristoctrat's wife's family and his mate Engels, who's own mother said "Karl should try generating capital as opposed to just writing about it."

Man was a prick.

If you don't like the hand life has dealt you then it's up to you to changeit.

Latest

Trending

Trending