Celtic warriors are anti-poppy

Original post by GEN.

Wait, wait...the British Empire fought for freedom??

Go google World War one and two you may have heard of them? Although your such a cretin I would be quite surprised if you have

Reply 44

Hylean

15

He's a good troll, this OP. I give him 8/10.

Reply 45

OP

The real Irish army.

vs the British

Reply 46

Celtic_Anthony

12

There's an argument to be made; he's just not doing it very well.

Reply 47

Original post by GEN.

Freedom fighters aka terrorists just like the Iraqis.

The Iraq's blow each other up more than they attack the Americans. Care to say how a civil war is a fight for freedom?

Reply 48

OP

Original post by Hylean

He's a good troll, this OP. I give him 8/10.

Don't be ashamed or get pressured by the Brits I'm Half and more nationalistic then you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpOoPQ6JmbM

Reply 49

iainthegreat

14

Original post by GEN.

warfare to save and protect yourselves vs fighting and killing to exploit other countries.

Your arguement is invalid for WWI and WWII

Exploiting other countries or ridding them of dictatorships for a brighter future, and ridding their land of drug smuggling terrorists?

Reply 50

Hylean

15

Original post by Celtic_Anthony

There's an argument to be made; he's just not doing it very well.

Sign of a good troll, really.

There is a decent debate behind this, but he's just trolling now.

Reply 51

OP

Original post by Aj12

The Iraq's blow each other up more than they attack the Americans. Care to say how a civil war is a fight for freedom?

That happened because the Americans caused a civil war, don't forget that they caught BRitish soldiers trying to plant explosives in a mosque in the south of Iraq.

Reply 52

Hylean

15

Original post by GEN.

Don't be ashamed or get pressured by the Brits I'm Half and more nationalistic then you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpOoPQ6JmbM

You can be whatever you want to be, mate.

Til you learn how to write a decent argument and discover what coherency is, I'm not that interested.

I don't need to be any more nationalistic than I already am. Northern Ireland doesn't need Republicans running their mouths off about the 'RA and the British Army, etc. Celtic doesn't need that ****. Celtic Anthony is right in that. Leave the bull**** at the door and sit down and watch the match without poppies, without the 'RA, without Paisley or any of the other symbols we all love/ hate so much.

Reply 53

Original post by GEN.

That happened because the Americans caused a civil war, don't forget that they caught BRitish soldiers trying to plant explosives in a mosque in the south of Iraq.

No the Americans invaded killed Saddam and went to their bases and then fought a war against an insurgency that then turned into a full blown civil war when the insurgents started killing other Muslims. A war that goes on across the middle East between Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims

Reply 54

OP

Original post by Aj12

No the Americans invaded killed Saddam and went to their bases and then fought a war against an insurgency that then turned into a full blown civil war when the insurgents started killing other Muslims. A war that goes on across the middle East between Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims

By getting rid of Saddam they caused a civil war, instead of letting the bathists soldiers etc. stay they got rid of them. Thats just like them invading London getting rid of the police/army etc. and then withdrawing, can you imagine chavs/edl/islamists etc. with weapons ofcourse the same thing would happen here.

Reply 55

Quady

20

Original post by GEN.

By getting rid of Saddam they caused a civil war, instead of letting the bathists soldiers etc. stay they got rid of them. Thats just like them invading London getting rid of the police/army etc. and then withdrawing, can you imagine chavs/edl/islamists etc. with weapons ofcourse the same thing would happen here.

I'm guessing you don't want to talk about imperialistic Scotland then?

Reply 56

anonstudent1

13

Original post by iainthegreat

Your arguement is invalid for WWI and WWII

Exploiting other countries or ridding them of dictatorships for a brighter future, and ridding their land of drug smuggling terrorists?

Oh come on, you cant be that naive. All military action and conquest by Britain has always been in self interest. Maybe on a rare occasion this would in the short term be an improvement for the indigenous population, but this does not mean they went around freeing countries.

(edited 13 years ago)

Reply 57

Bageera

Original post by Celtic_Anthony

There's an argument to be made; he's just not doing it very well.

Agreed.

Reply 58