Please can anyone help with these cases when dealing with frustration in commercial law;
McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission
When explaining what a seller/buyer would argue in relation to passing of property/risk, does the case illustrate contrary intention or apply where there is no contrary intention shown by the parties? I am familiar with the facts but unsure about applying to a problem question.
Barrow Lane & Ballard – Would you argue this case to argue for the remaining goods to be delivered to buyer, or use it to argue frustration?