Right, here is what i said:
'well first off make sure you know as much as you can about age identities, as it's bound to come up and maybe gender too.
16 mark - You are asked for two examples. Don't worry if you've forgot sociologists names and research etc, as i did in my mock and got 12/16 (which is like a B?) However it's good to know them esp for 24 mark question!
Example question: Give two ways in which age groups are descriminated against.
Here's how you answer it - One paragraph on one way, then another paragraph on the other way and give examples and explain. So here's something i'd write.
One way, is through the media. Cohen (1980) observed the media and how they created a moral panic amongst 1964 youth subcultures such as 'punks' and 'rockers', Cohen argued that the media exaggerated the youth's behaviour and labelled them as 'folk devils' and 'deviant' to create newsworthiness stories. Thorton (1995) and Savage (2007) would agree with Cohen, because they also found that the media seems to condem the youth more than they praise them.
Another way, is through the work place. Bradley (1996) found that people who are in the middle age catergory or older are less likely to get jobs when they are made redundant because they are seen as incapable of working at such a flexibility that someone much younger is able to. Sontag (1978) also found that there is double-standard in aging, whereby females are required to remain youthful throughtout their careers whereas men aren't. Moira stuart was 'retired' by the BBC in 2007, at age 58 when her male counterparts such as David Dimbleby who was 69, wasn't and were allowed to continue.
Now i'm not sure what marks that answer would get, BUT i'd probably give it 14. It has given two decent reasons, both relevant, it has all been explained and a huge variet of evidence.
Now for the third question:
You start by defining the term in the question i.e 'Explain and evaluate ethnic hybrid identities'. So you'd start off by defining ehtnic bybrid indentities, then you would say their significance, sociologists such as a Johal (1998) who came accross them. You would give tones of examples etc. You will also need to evalute it - so like critisise it - so you could say 'However despite the formation of terms like Brasian (british asian) asian individuals are still very unlikely to marry accross religious and caste lines (caste lines are what the hindus had to define upper class, lower etc)'
So you just need to focus on the question, define any terms in it and apply them to the question. Keep referring to the question, use a variet of sociologists too! Then at the end make a little conclusion of a few sentences about 2 or 3?
I'm sure that should be enough to get you like 16 - 20 marks. Maybe even more. '