Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Resolution 11/06 Concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict, United Arab Emirates

Announcements Posted on
  • View Poll Results:
    0
    0%

    • Thread Starter
    • 30 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    A new resolution from the United Arab Emirates:


    Resolution 11/06 Concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict, United Arab Emirates
    Resolution 11/06 Concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict.

    Committee: Security Council
    Proposed by: United Arab Emirates


    Expressing a vision of a region where two States, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace and security,
    Recognising the legitimacy of the Palestinian people to have a secure and peaceful independent Palestinian state,
    Emphasising the importance of the safety, protection and well-being of all civilians in the whole Middle East region, regardless of religion,
    Believing that direct negotiations between the Palestinians and the Israelis are the only way to secure lasting peace and security in the Middle East region,
    Taking into account fact that Jerusalem is a religious centre for all Abrahamic religions,
    Noting that the State of Palestine is recognised by 120 states worldwide,
    Reaffirming the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967,

    1. Condemns all acts of violence and terror against civilians on both sides.
    2. Calls for all parties involved to ensure that a resolution on a two state solution becomes a reality by 2014 and a reassessment of the effectiveness of the resolution be carried out in 2016.
    3. Calls for a UN peacekeeping force to be deployed along the Israel-Palestine borders to ensure a complete ceasefire for the duration of peace negotiations.
    4. Demands that Israel lift completely its blockade against Gaza, in order to allow the unimpeded flow to and from Gaza of people, humanitarian aid, and commercial goods to enable normal and dignified livelihoods in Gaza.
    5. Recommends that the UN dispatch a neutral multinational observer delegation to oversee the lifting of the blockade.
    6. Calls for the UN to investigate the viability of a large UN aid mission to help reconstruction efforts in Gaza.


    القرار 06/11 وفيما يتعلق بالنزاع بين اسرائيل وفلسطين
    القرار 06/11 وفيما يتعلق بالنزاع بين اسرائيل وفلسطين.

    لجنة : مجلس الأمن
    المقترحة من قبل : الامارات العربية المتحدة


    وإذ تعرب عن رؤية لمنطقة تعيش فيها دولتان ، اسرائيل وفلسطين ، تعيشان جنبا الى جنب في سلام وأمن ،
    واعترافا شرعية للشعب الفلسطيني في أن تكون آمنة ودولة فلسطينية مسالمة ومستقلة ،
    وتأكيدا أهمية حماية وسلامة ورفاه جميع المدنيين في منطقة الشرق الأوسط برمتها ، بغض النظر عن الدين ،
    إيمانا أن المفاوضات المباشرة بين الفلسطينيين والاسرائيليين هي السبيل الوحيد لضمان السلام والأمن الدائمين في منطقة الشرق الأوسط ،
    وإذ تأخذ في الاعتبار حقيقة أن القدس هي المركز الديني لجميع الديانات الإبراهيمية ،
    وإذ تلاحظ أن يعترف لدولة فلسطين من قبل 120 دولة في جميع أنحاء العالم ،
    وإذ تؤكد من جديد عدم شرعية المستوطنات الإسرائيلية في الأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة منذ عام 1967 ،

    1. يدين جميع أعمال العنف والإرهاب ضد المدنيين في كلا الجانبين.
    2. يدعو لجميع الأطراف المعنية لضمان وجود قرار بشأن حل الدولتين واقعا بحلول عام 2014 وتتم عملية إعادة تقييم لمدى فعالية هذا القرار في عام 2016.
    3. يدعو لقوة حفظ السلام التابعة للامم المتحدة التي سيتم نشرها على طول الحدود بين اسرائيل والفلسطينيين لضمان وقف اطلاق النار الشامل لمدة مفاوضات السلام.
    4. يطالب ان اسرائيل رفع حصارها بالكامل على غزة ، وذلك للسماح بتدفق دون عوائق من غزة من الناس ، والمساعدات الإنسانية والبضائع التجارية لتمكين معيشة طبيعية وكريمة في غزة.
    5. توصي ان الامم المتحدة ارسال وفد مراقب محايد المتعددة الجنسيات للاشراف على رفع الحصار.
    6. يدعو للامم المتحدة للتحقيق في جدوى مهمة كبيرة مساعدات الامم المتحدة للمساعدة في جهود إعادة الإعمار في غزة.







    (Original post by DayneD89)
    QFA
    • 28 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Israel rejects this resolution for numerous reasons, notably the demand for Israel to relinquish its sovereignty to UN peacekeepers when we should be learning from their failures in Lebanon, Sudan and Kosovo, and instead has submitted a counter-resolution to give the international community a chance to vote on what they think the fairest vision of a Middle-East peace will look like.
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
    Israel rejects this resolution for numerous reasons, notably the demand for Israel to relinquish its sovereignty to UN peacekeepers when we should be learning from their failures in Lebanon, Sudan and Kosovo, and instead has submitted a counter-resolution to give the international community a chance to vote on what they think the fairest vision of a Middle-East peace will look like.
    It merely sets up a temporary UN peacekeeping mission to prevent any attacks and aid peaceful negotiation. It is not forcing Israel to surrender its sovereignty. A UN presence is a necessity to bringing peace to the region. If you have other reasons, please list them as we feel this region needs argument attention for the peace and security of not only the people in palestine, but also the wider Islamic world.

    انها مجرد مجموعات تصل قوة حفظ سلام تابعة للامم المتحدة المؤقتة مهمة لمنع أي هجمات والمساعدات المفاوضات السلمية. ليس إجبار إسرائيل على الاستسلام سيادتها. وجود الامم المتحدة هو ضرورة إحلال السلام في المنطقة. إذا كان لديك أسباب أخرى ، رجاء تقديم قائمة بها لأننا نرى هذه المنطقة يحتاج إلى عناية وسيطة للسلام والأمن للشعب ، ليس فقط في فلسطين ، ولكن أيضا في العالم الإسلامي الأوسع.
    • 17 followers
    Online

    ReputationRep:
    The Islamic Republic of Iran accepts this resolution but we would rather see Israel relinquish all land they have gotten illegally since 1947.

    ---------------

    The Republic of Finland supports this resolution
    • 7 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    China supports this resolution we are clear of the problem of the Israel-Arab relations and we are willing to help to solve the problem. Thus we are committing as many soldiers, and resources followed by them, as possible to this cause.

    中国支持这项决议,我 都清楚以色列和阿拉伯 家关系的问题,我们愿 意协助解决问题。因此 我们正致力于尽可能多 士兵,和资源,其次是 他们,尽可能对这一事 。
    • 1 follower
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Poland hopes that both resolutions could be combined into one that will suit the needs of both Israel and Palestine. There are points in both resolutions that Poland is unable to support and therefore is forced to abstain from both resolutions.
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Egypt was one of the first Arab states to recognise Israel at it's 1967 borders. Since the 1980's Israel has been an ally and has shared many common interests with Egypt, including strong shared relationships with both the USA and western Europe.

    However, unfortunately Egypt must speak out against the complete occupation of Palestine. Heed your neighbour's warning Israel, there will never be peace in these lands as long as there is no State of Palestine. Find it in yourselves to offer compromise - offer some land to the Palestinian people where they can start their own state, even if it is not all the land gained from 1967, Egypt will stand by you in any compromising decision you make.

    OOC: Are you JakePearson? Same avatar, same country, different name? :L

    (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
    QFA
    • 28 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tenbinza)
    Egypt was one of the first Arab states to recognise Israel at it's 1967 borders. Since the 1980's Israel has been an ally and has shared many common interests with Egypt, including strong shared relationships with both the USA and western Europe.

    However, unfortunately Egypt must speak out against the complete occupation of Palestine. Heed your neighbour's warning Israel, there will never be peace in these lands as long as there is no State of Palestine. Find it in yourselves to offer compromise - offer some land to the Palestinian people where they can start their own state, even if it is not all the land gained from 1967, Egypt will stand by you in any compromising decision you make.

    OOC: Are you JakePearson? Same avatar, same country, different name? :L
    Egypt should realise that Israel has offered the Palestinians a state on numerous occasions since 1967. At Camp David and Taba we offered them 98% of the West Bank and all of Gaza - they rejected. We unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005 and received more violence in return. We literally have very little left to give ever since we turned over civil control of every Palestinian citizen in the West Bank to the Palestinian Authority.

    OOC: Yeah, different name.
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    South Korea accepts the parts of the resolution that promote the protection of human life, yet would like to abstain from supporting either the Palistinians or Israelis in the matter. We simply wish to encourage a peaceful solution to these matters.
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tinytadpoletim)
    South Korea accepts the parts of the resolution that promote the protection of human life, yet would like to abstain from supporting either the Palistinians or Israelis in the matter. We simply wish to encourage a peaceful solution to these matters.
    The UAE feels that it is this attitude that is prolonging war in the region. The world cannot decide a 'side' to pick and thus just expressed their wish for peace rather than doing something to encourage it.

    We have tried to keep this as unbiased as possible, while still condemning violent attacks from all sides, but also steer the region towards a lasting peace agreement.


    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن هذا هو الموقف الذي هو إطالة أمد الحرب في المنطقة. لا يمكن للعالم البت في "الجانب" لاختيار وبالتالي أعرب فقط عن رغبتهم في السلام بدلا من القيام بشيء لتشجيع ذلك.

    حاولنا الحفاظ على هذا ممكن غير منحازة، في حين لا تزال تدين الهجمات العنيفة من جميع الاطراف، ولكن أيضا توجيه المنطقة نحو التوصل إلى اتفاق سلام دائم
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DayneD89)
    The UAE feels that it is this attitude that is prolonging war in the region. The world cannot decide a 'side' to pick and thus just expressed their wish for peace rather than doing something to encourage it.

    We have tried to keep this as unbiased as possible, while still condemning violent attacks from all sides, but also steer the region towards a lasting peace agreement.


    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن هذا هو الموقف الذي هو إطالة أمد الحرب في المنطقة. لا يمكن للعالم البت في "الجانب" لاختيار وبالتالي أعرب فقط عن رغبتهم في السلام بدلا من القيام بشيء لتشجيع ذلك.

    حاولنا الحفاظ على هذا ممكن غير منحازة، في حين لا تزال تدين الهجمات العنيفة من جميع الاطراف، ولكن أيضا توجيه المنطقة نحو التوصل إلى اتفاق سلام دائم
    As this matter does not effect South Korea directly, and there are no obvious aggressors we withhold our right not to take "a side", but instead encourage both parties to come to a peaceful solution.

    South Korea asks the UAE whether they don't feel that their alternative of "picking sides" would not simply extrapolate the situation.

    (OOC) What do you study at uni? And I'm sure we will have some interesting conversations/wars in the future, as you are the rep for the DPRK... (/OOC)
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tinytadpoletim)
    As this matter does not effect South Korea directly, and there are no obvious aggressors we withhold our right not to take "a side", but instead encourage both parties to come to a peaceful solution.

    South Korea asks the UAE whether they don't feel that their alternative of "picking sides" would not simply extrapolate the situation.

    (OOC) What do you study at uni? And I'm sure we will have some interesting conversations/wars in the future, as you are the rep for the DPRK... (/OOC)
    The UAE is trying very hard not to take sides. Our resolution does not attempt to condemn either side, but rather to condemn acts of violence. Ignoring the issue and hoping for peace is what has led to this ongoing conflict. The world needs to move towards a peaceful middle east, and simply stating that it does not concern you and thus ignoring the situation is not the right answer.

    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تحاول من الصعب جدا على عدم اتخاذ الجانبين. قرارنا لا محاولة لإدانة أي من الجانبين ، وإنما لإدانة أعمال العنف. تجاهل هذه القضية ، وتأمل من أجل السلام هو ما أدى إلى هذا الصراع المستمر. يحتاج العالم إلى التحرك نحو السلام في الشرق الأوسط، ويفيد ببساطة انه لا يعنيك، وبالتالي تجاهل الوضع ليس الجواب الصحيح.

    [ooc] History, come September. I look forwards to it My first hypothetical in here was a Korean war. What do you study?[/ooc]
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DayneD89)
    The UAE is trying very hard not to take sides. Our resolution does not attempt to condemn either side, but rather to condemn acts of violence. Ignoring the issue and hoping for peace is what has led to this ongoing conflict. The world needs to move towards a peaceful middle east, and simply stating that it does not concern you and thus ignoring the situation is not the right answer.

    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تحاول من الصعب جدا على عدم اتخاذ الجانبين. قرارنا لا محاولة لإدانة أي من الجانبين ، وإنما لإدانة أعمال العنف. تجاهل هذه القضية ، وتأمل من أجل السلام هو ما أدى إلى هذا الصراع المستمر. يحتاج العالم إلى التحرك نحو السلام في الشرق الأوسط، ويفيد ببساطة انه لا يعنيك، وبالتالي تجاهل الوضع ليس الجواب الصحيح.

    [ooc] History, come September. I look forwards to it My first hypothetical in here was a Korean war. What do you study?[/ooc]
    South Korea is not ignoring the situation. We have constantly stated our belief that this violence should stop, and a peaceful resolution to these matters needs to take place as quickly as possible.

    South Korea feels that despite the UAE "trying very hard not to take sides", the publication of this resolution by them, in which the "illegality of the Israeli occupation in Palestine" is reaffirmed, and the point that "Palestine is recognised as a country" is made, clearly shows that the UAE has sided with the Palestinians. The Republic of Korea would thus like to ask the UAE again whether they don't feel that the support of either parties by other countries could simply make the situation worse?

    (OOC) History sounds very interesting I don't, I'm still at school. Just done my GCSEs so two more years of A levels before uni... A second Korean war is an interesting thought but I tend to think that it won't happen due to the DPRK's reliance on China, and China's reluctance to enter a war... (/OOC)
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tinytadpoletim)
    South Korea is not ignoring the situation. We have constantly stated our belief that this violence should stop, and a peaceful resolution to these matters needs to take place as quickly as possible.

    South Korea feels that despite the UAE "trying very hard not to take sides", the publication of this resolution by them, in which the "illegality of the Israeli occupation in Palestine" is reaffirmed, and the point that "Palestine is recognised as a country" is made, clearly shows that the UAE has sided with the Palestinians. The Republic of Korea would thus like to ask the UAE again whether they don't feel that the support of either parties by other countries could simply make the situation worse?

    (OOC) History sounds very interesting I don't, I'm still at school. Just done my GCSEs so two more years of A levels before uni... A second Korean war is an interesting thought but I tend to think that it won't happen due to the DPRK's reliance on China, and China's reluctance to enter a war... (/OOC)
    The UAE feels that talk is not enough now. This is not a far away regional conflict. This is an issue the whole of the Middle East is effected by. It is a prolonger conflict, an area of the land locked in constant battle. The UAE feels that words, blame and condemnations from the UN are not enough. A peace needs to be found in this region. Our resolution is a step towards a lasting peace to be established in the region.

    Bringing an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is as much a prerequisite for peace in the Middle East as is the Palestinian recognition of Israel. The Israeli occupation is not only inhuman and the cause of extreme suffering for the 3.5 million Palestinians living under its subjugation, but it is also illegal under international law. Recognising that international law is being broken is a duty of the UN. What is the point of international law if you are not to hold any person directly involved to account?

    The two state solution is not what the UAE would prefer. We do not recognise Israel. The Paelestine Authority and Israel do want a two-state solution.

    2006Israel’s ambassador to the U.S. urged Palestinians to cooperate with his nation and work toward establishing definite borders between separate Palestinian and Israeli states in a speech yesterday.


    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن الكلام لا يكفي الآن. ليس هذا النزاع الإقليمي بعيدا بعيدا. هذه مسألة يتم تنفيذ كامل منطقة الشرق الأوسط من قبل. هو إطالة أمد الصراع، وهي منطقة من الأرض تخوض معركة مستمرة. دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن الكلمات ، واللوم والاستنكار من قبل الأمم المتحدة ليست كافية. إن السلام يحتاج إلى أن وجدت في هذه المنطقة. قرارنا هو خطوة نحو السلام الدائم الذي سينشأ في المنطقة.

    وضع حد للاحتلال الإسرائيلي للأراضي الفلسطينية بقدر ما هو شرط مسبق للسلام في الشرق الأوسط كما هو اعتراف الفلسطينيين باسرائيل. الاحتلال الاسرائيلي ليس فقط اللاإنسانية، وسبب المعاناة الشديدة للفلسطينيين الذين يعيشون تحت 3500000 القهر، وإنما هو أيضا غير قانوني بموجب القانون الدولي. واعترافا بأن يتم كسر القانون الدولي هو واجب الأمم المتحدة. ما هو الهدف من القانون الدولي ، إذا كنت لا تولي أي شخص ضالع مباشرة إلى الحساب؟

    حل الدولتين ليس هو ما تفضل دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة. نحن لا نعترف باسرائيل. السلطة الفلسطينية واسرائيل لا تريد حل الدولتين.

    2006 سفير اسرائيل لدى الولايات المتحدة وحثت الفلسطينيين على التعاون مع بلاده والعمل من أجل إقامة حدود واضحة بين دولتين منفصلتين فلسطينية وإسرائيلية في خطاب ألقاه أمس


    [ooc]Well in ours China was largely forced out of it and simply stayed out of the debate. Actually, that may have been at the time I was China as well, but was concentrating all my efforts onto the DPRKs debates and war to spend enough time on China. I'll have to read that again.

    What A levels are you doing? [/ooc]
    • 2 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DayneD89)
    The UAE feels that talk is not enough now. This is not a far away regional conflict. This is an issue the whole of the Middle East is effected by. It is a prolonger conflict, an area of the land locked in constant battle. The UAE feels that words, blame and condemnations from the UN are not enough. A peace needs to be found in this region. Our resolution is a step towards a lasting peace to be established in the region.

    Bringing an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is as much a prerequisite for peace in the Middle East as is the Palestinian recognition of Israel. The Israeli occupation is not only inhuman and the cause of extreme suffering for the 3.5 million Palestinians living under its subjugation, but it is also illegal under international law. Recognising that international law is being broken is a duty of the UN. What is the point of international law if you are not to hold any person directly involved to account?

    The two state solution is not what the UAE would prefer. We do not recognise Israel. The Paelestine Authority and Israel do want a two-state solution.

    2006Israel’s ambassador to the U.S. urged Palestinians to cooperate with his nation and work toward establishing definite borders between separate Palestinian and Israeli states in a speech yesterday.


    دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن الكلام لا يكفي الآن. ليس هذا النزاع الإقليمي بعيدا بعيدا. هذه مسألة يتم تنفيذ كامل منطقة الشرق الأوسط من قبل. هو إطالة أمد الصراع، وهي منطقة من الأرض تخوض معركة مستمرة. دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة تشعر بأن الكلمات ، واللوم والاستنكار من قبل الأمم المتحدة ليست كافية. إن السلام يحتاج إلى أن وجدت في هذه المنطقة. قرارنا هو خطوة نحو السلام الدائم الذي سينشأ في المنطقة.

    وضع حد للاحتلال الإسرائيلي للأراضي الفلسطينية بقدر ما هو شرط مسبق للسلام في الشرق الأوسط كما هو اعتراف الفلسطينيين باسرائيل. الاحتلال الاسرائيلي ليس فقط اللاإنسانية، وسبب المعاناة الشديدة للفلسطينيين الذين يعيشون تحت 3500000 القهر، وإنما هو أيضا غير قانوني بموجب القانون الدولي. واعترافا بأن يتم كسر القانون الدولي هو واجب الأمم المتحدة. ما هو الهدف من القانون الدولي ، إذا كنت لا تولي أي شخص ضالع مباشرة إلى الحساب؟

    حل الدولتين ليس هو ما تفضل دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة. نحن لا نعترف باسرائيل. السلطة الفلسطينية واسرائيل لا تريد حل الدولتين.

    2006 سفير اسرائيل لدى الولايات المتحدة وحثت الفلسطينيين على التعاون مع بلاده والعمل من أجل إقامة حدود واضحة بين دولتين منفصلتين فلسطينية وإسرائيلية في خطاب ألقاه أمس


    [ooc]Well in ours China was largely forced out of it and simply stayed out of the debate. Actually, that may have been at the time I was China as well, but was concentrating all my efforts onto the DPRKs debates and war to spend enough time on China. I'll have to read that again.

    What A levels are you doing? [/ooc]

    South Korea points out that the firing of rockets by the Palestinians into Israel also contravenes international law, yet the UAE seem very happy not to mention that. The point that the Republic of Korea is trying to make is that the situation is far too complicated for outsiders to attempt to solve, we feel that the only positive resolution could arise from the Israelis and Palestinians reaching a conclusion for themselves. However, South Korea deplores any use of violence, and we feel that the job of the UN should be to try and prevent the use of violence, and promote talks between the two parties.

    (OOC) Well I think China is a key player in that situation, because without China the DPRK would have no support at all, so would not be able to maintain a war. Basically all of the DPRK's trade comes from China.

    I'm doing Maths, Further Maths, Economics and Government and Politics. In a dream world I would end up doing PPE at Oxford, but I don't know if that's likely yet or not... (/OOC)
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Turkey supports this resolution and would like to offer support to mediate any interactions between the future states.

    Pakistan will not recognize the state of Israel until a Palestinian state is set up
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tinytadpoletim)
    South Korea points out that the firing of rockets by the Palestinians into Israel also contravenes international law, yet the UAE seem very happy not to mention that. The point that the Republic of Korea is trying to make is that the situation is far too complicated for outsiders to attempt to solve, we feel that the only positive resolution could arise from the Israelis and Palestinians reaching a conclusion for themselves. However, South Korea deplores any use of violence, and we feel that the job of the UN should be to try and prevent the use of violence, and promote talks between the two parties.

    (OOC) Well I think China is a key player in that situation, because without China the DPRK would have no support at all, so would not be able to maintain a war. Basically all of the DPRK's trade comes from China.

    I'm doing Maths, Further Maths, Economics and Government and Politics. In a dream world I would end up doing PPE at Oxford, but I don't know if that's likely yet or not... (/OOC)
    The very first operative in out resolution is 'Condemns all acts of violence and terror against civilians on both sides.'. That is a condemnation of missile attacks.

    The negotiations that this resolution calls for are not met with pre-conditions. This allows both Israel and Palestine time to talk through any issues rather than continuing to fight. This resolution does exactly what the RoK says it wants to do. It uses peacekeeping forces to try and quell violence, while encouraging both sides to reach an agreement.


    [ooc] Yep, In ours China just stayed out of the conflict other than urging both sides to reach a peaceful situation.

    Are you interested in going into politics as a carrer then? PPE is the classic MPs degree So is History, to a much lesser degree.[/OOC]


    الأولى من المنطوق جدا في قرار الخروج من "تدين كل أعمال العنف والإرهاب ضد المدنيين في كلا الجانبين.". هذا هو ادانة للهجمات الصاروخية.

    لم يتم استيفاء هذه المفاوضات التي يدعو القرار مع شروط مسبقة. وهذا يسمح لكل من إسرائيل وفلسطين لوقت التحدث عن أي القضايا بدلا من الاستمرار في القتال. هذا القرار لا بالضبط كوريا الجنوبية تقول انها لا تريد القيام به. ويستخدم قوات حفظ السلام في محاولة لاخماد العنف، في حين يشجع الجانبين على التوصل الى اتفاق.


    The DPRK would like to remind the world that it hasn't spoken in a while that Israel is not a historical nation. It is not a nation that has any right to the land it occupies. In the 19th century the land of Palestine was inhabited by a multicultural population – approximately 86 percent Muslim, 10 percent Christian, and 4 percent Jewish – living in peace. It was the zionists, an extreme band of Jews, why looked for a Jewish homeland and settles of this land as the location. At first, this immigration to Palestine created no problems. However, as more and more Zionists immigrated to Palestine – many with the express wish of taking over the land for a Jewish state - tensions increased and fighting broke out.

    Finally, in 1947 the United Nations decided to intervene. However, rather than adhering to the principle of “self-determination of peoples,” in which the people themselves create their own state and system of government, the UN chose to revert to the medieval strategy whereby an outside power divides up other people’s land.

    Under considerable Zionist pressure, the UN recommended giving away 55% of Palestine to a Jewish state – despite the fact that this group represented only about 30% of the total population, and owned under 7% of the land.

    While this was always going to cause tensions in the region, it is significant to note that Arab armies entered the conflict only after Zionist forces had committed 16 massacres, including the grisly massacre of over 100 men, women, and children at Deir Yassin. By the end of the war, Israel had conquered 78 percent of Palestine; three-quarters of a million Palestinians had been made refugees; over 500 towns and villages had been obliterated; and a new map was drawn up, in which every city, river and hillock received a new, Hebrew name, as all vestiges of the Palestinian culture were to be erased. For decades Israel denied the existence of this population, former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir once saying: “There is no such thing as a Palestinian.”

    In 1967, Israel conquered still more land. Following the Six Day War, in which Israeli forces launched a surprise attack on Egypt, Israel occupied the final 22% of Palestine that had eluded it in 1948 – the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Since, according to international law it is inadmissible to acquire territory by war, these are occupied territories and do not belong to Israel.

    The original population of what is now Israel was 96 percent Muslim and Christian, yet, these refugees are prohibited from returning to their homes in the self-described Jewish state (and those within Israel are subjected to systematic discrimination). The state of Israel was forced upon the world, and maintained by the US.


    조선 민주주의 인민 공화국은 세상을 상기하고 싶은가 이스라엘 역사 민족이 아니라고 한 동안 말을하지 않은. 그것이 점유 토지 권리를 가진 나라되지 않습니다. 19 세기에 팔레스타인의 토지는 다문화 인구가 살고 있었어요 - 이슬람 약 86% 10 % 기독교와 유대인 4% - 평화에 살고. 그것은 유대인 조국에 대한 검토한 결과, 위치 등이 땅의 자리잡고 왜 zionists, 유대인의 극단적인 밴드였다. 처음에는 팔레스타인이 이민은 아무런 문제를 만들어 없습니다. 그러나, 더 많은 Zionists로 팔레스타인에 이주 - 유대인 국가를위한 토지 지배의 명시하고자 많은 - 긴장이 증가하고 싸우는 탈출.

    마지막으로, 1947 년 유엔이 개입하기로 결정했다. 그러나, 오히려 사람들이 자신들이 정부의 자신의 상태와 시스템을 만들 수있는 '민족 자결'의 원칙을 준수하는 것보다, 유엔은 외부 전원이 다른 사람의 토지를 분할 의하여 중세 전략으로 되돌아하기로 결정했습니다.

    이 그룹은 전체 인구의 약 30 % 표현하고, 토지의 7 % 이하 소유하고있다는 사실에도 불구하고 - 상당한 명이지 압력 아래에서 유엔은 유대인 상태로 팔레스타인의 55 %를 멀리주는 것이 좋습니다.

    이것은 항상이 지역에서 긴장의 원인이 될 동안, 그것은 아랍 군대는 시온주의를 신봉하는 사람의 세력이 데어 Yassin에서 100 개 이상의 남성, 여성 및 어린이의 불쾌한 학살을 포함, 16 massacres을 다하고했다 후에 충돌을 입력한 참고 중요하다. 만 팔레스타인의 4 분의 3은 난민을 만들어있었습니다,, 500 도시와 마을은 모두 있었다, 전쟁이 끝날 무렵, 이스라엘은 팔레스타인의 78 %를 정복했고, 새로운지도가 수립되었던 모든 도시, 강 팔레스타인 문화의 모든 흔적은 삭제 될 것처럼하고 힐록, 새, 히브리어 이름을 받았습니다. 수십년 동안 이스라엘이 인구의 존재를 거부, 이스라엘 전 총리 골다 메이르 한번 한적 없어요 "팔레스타인 같은 것은이 없습니다."

    1967 년, 이스라엘은 여전히​​ 많은 토지를 정복. 웨스트 뱅크와 가자지구 - 이스라엘 군은 이집트에 기습 공격을 개시하는 식스 데이 전쟁, 다음, 이스라엘은 1948 년 그것을 벗어나했다 팔레스타인의 마지막 22%를 차지. 이후, 국제법에 따라 그것이 전쟁으로 영토를 얻기위한 증거로 채택될 수없는 것이, 이들은 점령 지역이며, 이스라엘에 속하지 않습니다.

    이스라엘이 아직 이슬람교와 기독교 96%했습니다 지금은 어떤의 원래 인구는 이러한 난민은 자기 설명 유대인 상태에서 그들의 가정 (및 이스라엘 이내에 그가 체계적인 차별의 대상이됩니다)로 돌아가는 것이 금지되어 있습니다. 이스라엘의 상태는 세계에 강제하고, 미국에 의해 유지되었다.
    • Thread Starter
    • 30 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    This goes to vote tommorow
    • Thread Starter
    • 30 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Poll Added!
    • 27 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    The UAE votes for this resolution.

    الأصوات الإمارات العربية المتحدة لهذا القرار


    The DPRK abstains as we refuse to recognise Israel as a seperate state. This satelite US state should be removed from the world map.

    우리가 별도의 상태로 이스라엘을 인정 거부로 조선 민주주의 인민 공화국은 기권입니다. 위성이 미국의 상태는 세계지도에서 삭제해야합니다.

    (Original post by thunder_chunky)
    X
    Please could you add in the DPRK vote.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?

    this is what you'll be called on TSR

  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?

    never shared and never spammed

  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide the button to the right to create your account

    Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: August 5, 2011
New on TSR

SQA results day chat

Share your grade expectations for Tuesday 5 August

Article updates
Useful resources
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.