And useful too. But no, I was thinking more on the lines of this:
(Original post by Fires)
Is it the electronic tag she is now wearing? Or her ban from entering London? Both are a pretty obvious turn-on.
Last edited by Winning; 11-08-2011 at 16:38.
If you're referring to this comment:
(Original post by Orwell)
I'm not defending her, but you don't know anything about her other than her schooling and the fact that she has been involved in the riots. Not exactly what you'd hope for to make as detailed a character assassination as you've done.
Anyhow, seems to me that she got caught up in the whole thing, unfortunate for her, but it does make you wonder how exactly with her education she wasn't able to distinguish between right or wrong, or even think of the consequences of her actions.
You should know I was just joking at taking a light-hearted perspective on what has happened. I wasn't making a character assissination; I was making fun of her.
Surely that's not a bad thing. This is a girl who, despite you claims of her 'getting caught up in it', stole electrical equipment worth thousands of pounds and was associated with the violence that must have terrified the staff at Curry's. She's well educated; she knew what she was doing. She didn't even want that stuff, I imagine. It seems to me that she was bored and wanted some excitement in her life.
But yes, maybe her name in the paper's will make her feel a bit more inclined to make more friends with ordinary guys to counter the enemies she will probably have if she is found guilty.
She's a pathetic, disgrace. All of them are.
Last edited by issyconnor; 11-08-2011 at 16:32.