DO NOT believe that rebels are overtaking Tripoli

At which point did my posts come off as being a bit of a prat,

And some people believe the world is run by the Illuminati, the moon landings were a hoax, Roswell was a genuine UFO cover-up, that Bin Laden is alive, Saddam's clone was executed and Diana was assassinated because she loved an Arab. Deny any one of these in front of a conspiracy nut, and you're a sheep.

Well, I'd rather be a sheep than a paranoid lemming.

the American government conducted a controlled demolition to collapse the towers.

Again, your not saying anything of any real relevance. The fact that there are links to terrorist groups is not breaking news, nor is the fact the NTC is full of ex military and political people. The standard of living is irreverent. If your going to claim that we are all full of propaganda, at least state some facts that aren't widely acknowledged.

LOL its amusing that you dont even understand the nature of propoganda. In regards to the ethnic cleansing happening in places like Misurata. When was the last time you heard any of it actually being reported in any substantial detail by outlets like the BBC or CNN? Even western publications like the WSJ have made note of this. What are you going to tell me next? That some clown on TSR knows something they dont?

I also have to say you're full of crap. Ask anyone following the Libyan conflict and I bet you they will think Libya was a backwater dictatorship before the arrival of NATO. Once again simply not the case. This war isnt so much about propaganda as it is about this war being completely illegitimate. None of the people disagreeing with me have provided any facts of cited sources saying otherwise. And frankly it shows how stupid the lot of you commenting on a conflict and a country you know nothing about. Libya has gone from one from of the poorest nations in Africa to one of the richest. How is the fact that NATO sees military engagement to "protect the people" being rather fishy not a legitimate point.

Amusing that the idiotic and ignorant jump on the "conspiracy theorist" banwagon as soon as someone has an opinion which doesnt correlate with the mainstream media. How simple minded is that? I am not a conspiracy theorist, I dont believe 911 was an inside job, I dont believe in the hoax moon landing, I dont believe in UFOs or any other garbage tin foil hat wearers claim. However when presented with such a wealth of evidence in regards to the illegitimacy of this current conflict it is hard not to draw certain conclusions.

Also some interesting points in regards to the complete disregard for international law in this conflict: UN Resolution 1970 (2011) forbids the delivery of weaponry of any sort to any citizen in Libya. So who has been delivering weapons to the "unarmed civilians" and when? UN Resolution 1973 (2011) while allowing the use of force to protect "civilians" does not mention attacking conventional ground forces not engaged in battle to help "rebels" nor does it bear any mention whatsoever of aiding rebellious forces to gain power. If, as has been reported, it is true that Egypt and the USA are responsible for shipping weapons to the Libyan "unarmed civilians" then both are in breach of UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) and in which case, what is Mr. Ban Ki-Moon going to do about it? Nothing, probably. So much for his legacy. The UN Secretary-General who aided and abetted war crimes and a clear breach of UN law and did nothing? If the USA and Egypt can, as has been alleged, arm the "unarmed civilians", then what is to stop someone else arming Al-Qathafi?"

I would like you to present an argument other than my various points "not being relevant" has it is leading me to believe you dont actually have an argument and know **** all about Libya or the dynamics of the conflict. Which makes you kind of stupid for commenting in this thread in the first place.

No offence, but your a ****ing idiot. Not because of your views, but because you think nobody else realizes it. There are tribal, ethnic and religious problems in the rebel force, and NATO is over looking it and supporting them because they wish to gain a friendly regime in Libya, that is all there s too it. Your just recycling garbage to try and appear to be intelligent.

Also some interesting points in regards to the complete disregard for international law in this conflict: UN Resolution 1970 (2011) forbids the delivery of weaponry of any sort to any citizen in Libya. So who has been delivering weapons to the "unarmed civilians" and when? UN Resolution 1973 (2011) while allowing the use of force to protect "civilians" does not mention attacking conventional ground forces not engaged in battle to help "rebels" nor does it bear any mention whatsoever of aiding rebellious forces to gain power.
.

LOL its amusing that you dont even understand the nature of propoganda. In regards to the ethnic cleansing happening in places like Misurata. When was the last time you heard any of it actually being reported in any substantial detail by outlets like the BBC or CNN? Even western publications like the WSJ have made note of this. What are you going to tell me next? That some clown on TSR knows something they dont?

I also have to say you're full of crap. Ask anyone following the Libyan conflict and I bet you they will think Libya was a backwater dictatorship before the arrival of NATO. Once again simply not the case. This war isnt so much about propaganda as it is about this war being completely illegitimate. None of the people disagreeing with me have provided any facts of cited sources saying otherwise. And frankly it shows how stupid the lot of you commenting on a conflict and a country you know nothing about. Libya has gone from one from of the poorest nations in Africa to one of the richest. How is the fact that NATO sees military engagement to "protect the people" being rather fishy not a legitimate point.

Amusing that the idiotic and ignorant jump on the "conspiracy theorist" banwagon as soon as someone has an opinion which doesnt correlate with the mainstream media. How simple minded is that? I am not a conspiracy theorist, I dont believe 911 was an inside job, I dont believe in the hoax moon landing, I dont believe in UFOs or any other garbage tin foil hat wearers claim. However when presented with such a wealth of evidence in regards to the illegitimacy of this current conflict it is hard not to draw certain conclusions.

Also some interesting points in regards to the complete disregard for international law in this conflict: UN Resolution 1970 (2011) forbids the delivery of weaponry of any sort to any citizen in Libya. So who has been delivering weapons to the "unarmed civilians" and when? UN Resolution 1973 (2011) while allowing the use of force to protect "civilians" does not mention attacking conventional ground forces not engaged in battle to help "rebels" nor does it bear any mention whatsoever of aiding rebellious forces to gain power. If, as has been reported, it is true that Egypt and the USA are responsible for shipping weapons to the Libyan "unarmed civilians" then both are in breach of UNSC Resolution 1970 (2011) and in which case, what is Mr. Ban Ki-Moon going to do about it? Nothing, probably. So much for his legacy. The UN Secretary-General who aided and abetted war crimes and a clear breach of UN law and did nothing? If the USA and Egypt can, as has been alleged, arm the "unarmed civilians", then what is to stop someone else arming Al-Qathafi?"

I would like you to present an argument other than my various points "not being relevant" has it is leading me to believe you dont actually have an argument and know **** all about Libya or the dynamics of the conflict. Which makes you kind of stupid for commenting in this thread in the first place.

You don't really think UN resolutions are meant to be followed to the letter do you?

UN resolution says all possible means to protect civilians ar troops on the ground. That it is the only thing it forbids. The best way to do this is bring a quick end to the conflict and get rid of the brutal dictatorship that instigated the violence

It wasnt a "brutal dictatorship" you tard, once again the point which is being completely being ignored is that Gaddafi was being praised by the same UN for the strides being taken in moving away from terrorist links, social development, economic development and racial tolerance. But thank you for reiterating the point I made to Abbadon27. The fact that the libyan military intervention is highly unjustified IS NOT widely known and hence why propaganda is being used effectively to convey false messages.

Interesting question, have any of you ever been to Libya? Do you know anyone from Libya too. Because I find the nonsense you clowns are coming out with as rather amusing. Take it from someone who knows people from there, has passed through there. The picture you are being painted is false.

LOL what the **** does that even mean? Are people just straight up ignoring criminality depending on whether it suits them. Breach of UN resolutions have been the justifications for sanctions and military intervention on numerous occasion. Why does a set of rules apply for one and not the other. The stupidity in this thread is mind numbing.

It wasnt a "brutal dictatorship" you tard, once again the point which is being completely being ignored is that Gaddafi was being praised by the same UN for the strides being taken in moving away from terrorist links, social development, economic development and racial tolerance. But thank you for reiterating the point I made to Abbadon27. The fact that the libyan military intervention is highly unjustified IS NOT widely known and hence why propaganda is being used effectively to convey false messages.

Interesting question, have any of you ever been to Libya? Do you know anyone from Libya too. Because I find the nonsense you clowns are coming out with as rather amusing. Take it from someone who knows people from there, has passed through there. The picture you are being painted is false.

LOL what the **** does that even mean? Are people just straight up ignoring criminality depending on whether it suits them. Breach of UN resolutions have been the justifications for sanctions and military intervention on numerous occasion. Why does a set of rules apply for one and not the other. The stupidity in this thread is mind numbing.

I read a few days ago that the rebels/nato were preparing to stage an illusion that tripoli was being taken, by constucting a fake green square and filming it in the hands of rebels and then airing it on non libya government controlled tv channels, this was in conjunction with nato bombing of libya government controlled tv stations (which has been reported in past couple weeks) so that people could only see the fake story of libya being taken.

Heres the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tghoRiZ3ek&feature=uploademail

Heres the facebook group that although is deffinitly pro libyan government propoganda source it does give you the other side of the story (libyan side) to whats happening:

STOP THE WAR IN LIBYA. WE DEMAND IT

Thats the group to search for on fb

If you have to ask, you won't understand.

If you have to ask, you won't understand.