Hey, is it possible if you can look at an essay for me, I am currently do AS Level Sociology.
Which has more of an impact on student’s educational achievement, internal factors or external factors, and to what extent does sociological research prove this? (20 marks)
There are many factors that impact student’s educational achievement; these factors are then put into two categories, internal factors and external factors. It can be argued that both factors have more of an impact on educational achievement according to different sociologist. Internal factors are factors within the school, for example, what goes on in school and how it affects a pupil’s progress. This includes setting, teacher labelling and self-fulfilling prophecy. Whereas, external factors are factors outside of school, for example, family, neighbourhood or socioeconomic status which schools have little control over. This includes material and cultural explanations. Although treated separately, these two factors are inter-linked.
One way in which internal factors impact educational achievement is through the use of setting. Setting is when students are placed into different teaching groups based on their knowledge in exams, so if a student does better than another student in an exam, they will be placed in a higher set. Setting may affect educational achievement because those in the lower sets may have to sit ‘foundation’ papers which limit the grades you can get, as the highest you can achieve is a C grade, which impacts student’s in the lower sets educational achievement as they will only be taught up to grade C topics and will lack the additional knowledge that other students may have.
Functionalist sociologist may agree with setting as they believe we live in a meritocratic society. This means that we are awarded based on how hard we work, as a result can move up in a better place in society. In this case the students in the bottom set did not work hard and so are not able to be merited with moving up to higher sets and performing better in the education system. However, Marxist sociologists may not agree as they believe in social class inequality. This means that a student’s social class impacts their educational achievement, hence to why they are in a bottom set in the first place. Working class students are unable to excel in the education system as they do not have the financial support to help them do further work outside of school, therefore don’t do well in exams and end up in low sets. Whereas, middle class students can afford extra resources, for example tuition, to help them excel in the education system.
Another internal factor is labelling. Labelling is the process of attaching a meaning or definition to an individual based on stereotypes. For example, in the education system, aggressive and black (mainly Caribbean male) are labelled ‘thugs’ or ‘gangsters’. Teacher labelling affects educational achievement because if a teacher constantly calls a student by a bad name, for example ‘dumb’, eventually the child will think he/she is ‘dumb’ and may start acting this way. This is called the ‘Halo Effect’. The halo effect works both positively and negatively where the teacher views the student in a negative way. These stereotypes/labels will be based on earlier impressions and will dictate all future interaction.
The self-fulfilling prophecy also occurs when labelling. The self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when students truly believe the label they have been given, so the label then becomes a reality. However, Fuller (1980) suggested that the theory of labelling is deterministic as students may reject the label they have been given, to change how others view them. For example, evidence was found in a study, although black girls were subject to a bad label and stereotyped based in low sets, some of them rejected to the label by proving teachers wrong. Therefore this suggests theory of labelling is too deterministic, as it doesn’t take in account those who rebel and take the label positively to change how people view them.
External factors impact educational achievement with the use of material and culture to help explain this. Although schooling and further education is free up until the age of 19, material factors outside school like poverty and low wages, diet, health and housing can all have an impact on how well individuals do at school. This helps explain the pattern of working class underachievement in education. Low wages and poverty and housing all play an important part with external factors that impact educational achievement. Cooper and Stewart (2013) suggested that poorer children have bad behaviour, worse cognitive and bad health, this then had an impact on how they did in school as there was a repeat of bad behaviour which lead to them performing badly in school, as they would be sent out of class and not learn the information needed to answer exam questions. Also bad health leads to students missing time off school and learning, and making them unable to answer questions in the exam as they missed time off when learning those specific topics. Waldfogel and Washbrook (2010) pointed out that low income families have bad housing, so was difficult for them to study as their homes were more likely to be crowded or damp and spent time off school as bad housing lead to bad health. This then lead to them falling behind in class and making it difficult to catch up.
The cultural explanation of underachievement in education suggests that values, attitudes and language are deficient in various ways compared to white middle class; this is known as culture deprivation. Sodha and Margo’s (2010) study shows that cultural factors for example, parental attitudes towards the education system and interest in their child’s education, this lead to the children in the working class being less engaged in their educational achievement.
Parental attitudes to education play an important part in the education system. The results of Douglas (1964) found that parental attitude was the most important factor which best explained educational success and failure. A lack of encouragement and involvement in a child’s education lead to poor behaviour from students in the education system. This meant that if a student’s parent did not pay attention to their child’s educational achievement, they did not do well in their exams and so, according to Douglas, the student’s parent was at fault of their child’s failure. Then Feinstein and Symons (1999), Goodman and Gregg (2010) and Gorard, See and Davies (2012) all found recently that the Douglas’s study is still true till this day. It was also found that middle class parents pay more attention to their child’s progress at school by regularly visiting the school and meeting with their child’s teachers. Also middle class parents are more likely to want their children to stay at school beyond the minimum leaving age and to encourage them to do so than working-class parents.
In conclusion, research has shown that external factors have more of an impact to a student’s educational achievement than internal factors. This is because poverty, which is an external factor, leads to a student’s performance being poor in school resulting to them being in a low set, which is an internal factor. It also leads to other external factors such as bad housing, bad health etc. External factors have more of a power over a child’s educational achievement as there are many hidden costs in the education system despite the education system being free of charge, and many outside resources that are needed for a child to excel and perform well in the education system.
Thank You