|
19-01-2006: 19th January 2006 22:22
|
#2
|
|
|
|
Exalted Member
|
|
 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 257
|
|
|
Hiya,
Sorry I didn't reply earlier, I had seen this post, but I was really stressed with an exam I had today lol. But now I'll (try and) help you.
Hmmmmm I never really liked this play lol, and tbh do you have to look at all those things? Whenever I got directing questions I only ever really looked at performance, as it was a naturalistic play, and all my lighting and sound ideas are really symbolic lol. I'd be tempted to look at it like this:
Introduction - BRIEFLY explain the importance and function of comedy in the first act (try and keep it really brief, no more than five mins)
Then the main section of the essay - choose 3 or 4 moments (you don't have to choose them before you start writing, I just had a flick and the first one i came to, wrote about that, then another flick, etc. etc. lol), and in each one you have to JUSTIFY from the text. Oh, and keep it really detailed (that's why only have 3 or 4 moments; better to write about few in detail than loads briefly). SO, for example, I'm not sure if this is in the first act, but that really fat woman and the weedy man? I'd pick just one line from there, such as 'strolling at night in the pale moonlight' - how would weedy man (sorry, forgotten his name lol) react to this? where would he be on stage? how would she say it? how would you do it on stage? and why - what's in the text to make you do it like this?
Just go like that for a couple more moments, and always keep referring to COMEDY. Oooo, and don't do a conclusion, it doesn't get you any extra marks, and wastes time.
Hope this helps. If it contrasts completely with wat you're teacher said, ignore it, but that's how I was told to do it, and it worked! lol
Joe
|
|
|
|