The Student Room Group

1987 Specimen STEP solutions thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by ben-smith
STEP III Q1
a)let InI_n denote the product up to n.
I2=34,I3=23,I4=58,I5=35,I6=712,...I_2=\frac{3}{4},I_3=\frac{2}{3},I_4=\frac{5}{8}, I_5=\frac{3}{5}, I_6=\frac{7}{12},...
By inspection, these numbers seem to be of the form In=n+12nI_n=\frac{n+1}{2n} so let's guess that.
We have already proved this to be the case for n=2 so let us presume, for the purpose of induction, that Ik=k+12kI_k=\frac{k+1}{2k}. Now let n=k+1:
Ik+1=Ik(11(k+1)2)=k+12(k)(k+1)21(k+1)2=k+22(k+1)I_{k+1}=I_k*(1-\frac{1}{(k+1)^2})=\frac{k+1}{2(k)}*\frac{(k+1)^2-1}{(k+1)^2}=\frac{k+2}{2(k+1)} So our guess is thus true by mathematical induction.
b) Consider the binomial expansion of (1+x)n(1+x)^n:
(1+x)n=r=0n(nr)xr(1+x)^n=\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^n \displaystyle \binom{n}{r}x^r. Letting x=-1 gives us:
r=0n(nr)(1)r=0[br]r=0k(1)r(nr)=r=k+1n(1)r(nr)[br]=r=k+1n(1)r1(nr)[br]=r=k+1n(1)r1(n1r1)+r=k+1n(1)r1(n1r)\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^n \displaystyle \binom{n}{r}(-1)^r=0[br]\Rightarrow \displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^k (-1)^r\displaystyle \binom{n}{r}=-\displaystyle\sum_{r=k+1}^n(-1)^r \displaystyle \binom{n}{r}[br]=\displaystyle\sum_{r=k+1}^n(-1)^{r-1} \displaystyle \binom{n}{r}[br]=\displaystyle\sum_{r=k+1}^n(-1)^{r-1} \displaystyle \binom{n-1}{r-1}+\displaystyle\sum_{r=k+1}^n(-1)^{r-1} \displaystyle \binom{n-1}{r}
Notice that the i+1 th element in the first summation cancels with the ith element in the second summation leaving the first element in the first summation so:
r=0k(1)r(nr)=(1)k(n1k)\displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^k (-1)^r\displaystyle \binom{n}{r}=(-1)^k \displaystyle \binom{n-1}{k}
As required.


Isn't there a problem in (b) in that the statement
r=0k(1)r(nr)=r=k+1n(1)r(nr) \displaystyle\sum_{r=0}^k (-1)^r\displaystyle \binom{n}{r}=-\displaystyle\sum_{r=k+1}^n(-1)^r \displaystyle \binom{n}{r} is only true for odd values of n with k=n12k=\frac{n-1}{2}
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by DFranklin
STEP III, Q15: It's easy to convince yourself that the villages all remain connected if less than 3 roads are down (draw diagrams if you wish to illustrate the possible cases).
If 3 roads are down and they all go to the same village, that village is cut off. Otherwise, the villages remain connected. Again, draw diagrams if you wish.
If 4 roads are down, then it's clearly impossible for 2 roads to connect all 4 villages. (The roads must connect at a village, and that only leaves 2 ends to connect 3 villages).
Even more obvious for 5 and 6 roads.

P(more than 3 roads down) = 15p4(1p)2+6p5(1p)+p615 p^4(1-p)^2 + 6p^5(1-p) + p^6 (binomial)
P(A cut off by having exactly 3 roads down) = p3(1p)3p^3 (1-p)^3. So P(any village cut off by exactly 3 roads down) = 4p3(1p)34p^3(1-p)^3

So P(villages are cut off) = p3[4(1p)3+15p(1p)2+6p5(1p)+p6]p^3[4(1-p)^3 + 15p(1-p)^2+6p^5(1-p)+p^6]
So P(villages are connected) = 1p3[4(1p)3+15p(1p)2+6p5(1p)+p6]1 - p^3[4(1-p)^3 + 15p(1-p)^2+6p^5(1-p)+p^6]

When p = 1/2, this equals 644156164=3864=1932\dfrac{64 - 4 - 15 - 6 - 1}{64} = \dfrac{38}{64} = \dfrac{19}{32}

Wow - only 2 probablity questions out of 16. Hard times for probability specialists...


haven't you been just a little bit careless. Where you have taken out the factor of p^3 you have still left p^5 and p^6 inside the brackets.
Original post by brianeverit
haven't you been just a little bit careless. Where you have taken out the factor of p^3 you have still left p^5 and p^6 inside the brackets.
Looks that way, yeah.
Original post by ben-smith
Q12
A, B and C form a triangle. Let the angle at A be theta and the angle a C be phi. Let us further denote D to be the point on CB that also lies on the line perpendicular to CB and goes through A and T is the tension in the string.
The rod is in equilibrium so the forces vertically and the moments about A are balanced:
Unparseable latex formula:

Mg=Tcos\phi[br]T(AD)=(L/2)sin\thetaMg


To find AD, notice that the are of triangle is 1/2(αL(AD))1/2(\alpha L (AD)) and also 12L2αsin(π(θ+ϕ)) \frac{1}{2}L^2\alpha sin(\pi-(\theta+\phi)).
Equating the two, we get:
AD=Lsin(θ+ϕ)AD=Lsin(\theta+\phi)
Substituting in from our first equations:
Unparseable latex formula:

TLsin(\theta+\phi)=(L/2)sin\thetaMg \Rightarrow sin(\theta+\phi)=\frac{sin\thetacos\phi}{2}[br]\Rightarrow sin\theta cos\phi+cos\theta sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta cos\phi}{2}[br]\Rightarrow cos\theta sin\phi=-\frac{sin\theta cos\phi}{2}


By the sine rule:
sinϕL=sinθαLsinϕ=sinθα\frac{sin\phi}{L}=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha L}\Rightarrow sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha}
So:
sinθcosθα=sinθα2sin2θ2α2cosθ=α2sin2θ[br]4cos2θ=α2sin2θcos2θ=α213\frac{sin\theta cos\theta }{\alpha}=-\frac{sin\theta \sqrt{\alpha^2-sin^2\theta}}{2\alpha} \Rightarrow 2cos\theta=-\sqrt{\alpha^2-sin^2\theta}[br]\Rightarrow 4cos^2\theta=\alpha^2-sin^2\theta \Rightarrow cos^2\theta=\frac{\alpha^2-1}{3}
The function cos2θ cos^2\theta is greater that or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 1 but, in this case, we don't want the equality case as that would mean A, B and C would be collinear so:
1<α<21<\alpha<2
To find the tension:
T=Mgcosϕ[br]sinϕ=sinθαcosϕ=1/α(α24α23)=2α(α213)1/2 T=\frac{Mg}{cos\phi}[br]sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha} \Rightarrow cos\phi = 1/ \alpha(\sqrt{\alpha^2-\frac{4-\alpha^2}{3}})=\frac{2}{\alpha}(\frac{\alpha^2-1}{3})^{1/2}
So:
T=Mgcosϕ)=Mgα2(3α21)1/2T=\frac{Mg}{cos\phi)}=\frac{Mg \alpha}{2} (\frac{3}{\alpha^2-1})^{1/2}
As required.


The question asked for the inclination of the rod to the vertical. Where have you found that? I cannot see it anywhere.
Thought we should have a readable version of the solution for paper III question 10

(a) If n n is an odd number then it may be weritten as 4k±14k\pm1 for some integer k k
Hence n2=16k2±8k+1 n^2=16k^2 \pm 8k +1 and so leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 8.
If n n is an even number then we may write it as 4k or 4k±2 4k \mathrm {\ or\ } 4k \pm 2
So n2=16k2 or 16k2±16k+4n^2=16k^2 \mathrm{\ or\ } 16k^2 \pm16k+4 and so leaves a remainder of 0 or 4 when divided by 8.
A number of the form 8n+7 8n+7 obviously leaves a remainder of 7 when divided by 8.
The sum of any 3 square numbers must leave a remainder of a+b+c a+b+c where a,b,c a,b,c take values from the set (0,1,4) (0,1,4) and so cannot be equal to 7.
I.e. No number of the form 8n+7 8n+7 can be the sum of 3 squares.
(b) n=123n+1+3(52n+1)=24+3×53=16+375=391=17×23 n=1 \Rightarrow 2^{3n+1}+3(5^{2n+1})=2^4+3\times5^3=16+375=391=17 \times 23
So true for n=1n=1
Assume that 23k+1+3(52k+1)=17X 2^{3k+1}+3(5^{2k+1})=17X for some integer XX
 replacing k with k+1 we have \mathrm{\ replacing\ } k \mathrm{\ with\ }k+1 \mathrm{\ we\ have\ }
23k+4+3(52k+3)=25(23k+1+3(52k+1)25×23k+1+23k+42^{3k+4}+3(5^{2k+3})=25(2^{3k+1}+3(5{2k+1})- 25 \times 2^{3k+1}+2^{3k+4}
=25×17X23k+1(2523)=17(25X23k+1)= 25 \times 17X-2^{3k+1}(25-2^3)=17(25X-2^{3k+1})
25X23k+125X-2^{3k+1} is an integer hence true for n=kn=k implies true for n=k+1 n=k+1 hence true for all integers by induction.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by DFranklin
STEP III, Q8.

(i) I'm going to be lazy and use capitals to denote vectors. Let the vertices of the tetrahedron be A, B, C, D. Sum of squares of edges = |A-B|^2+|A-C|^2+|A-D|^2+|B-C|^2+|B-D|^2+|C-D|^2.
Sum of squares of midpoints = [(A+B-C-D)^2 + (A+C-B-D)^2 + (A+D-B-C)^2] / 4.
So 4 x Sum of squares of midpoints = (A+B-C-D)^2 + (A+C-B-D)^2 + (A+D-B-C)^2 = ((A-D)+(B-C))^2 + ((A-B)+(C-D))^2 +((A-C)+(D-B))^2
= (A-D)^2+(B-C)^2 + 2(A-D).(B-C)+(A-B)^2+(C-D)^2+2(A-B).(C-D)+(A-C)^2+(D-B)^2 + (A-C).(D-B).
So, sufficient to show (A-D).(B-C) + (A-B).(C-D) + (A-C).(D-B) = 0. Some tedious expansion gives us A.B-A.C+C.D-B.D+A.C-A.D+B.D-B.C+A.D-A.B+B.C-C.D and everything cancels.

(ii) Take a = 3I + 2J + 6K, b = xI + yJ + K.
Then we have (3x+2y+6)32+42+62x2+y2+1=7x2+y2+1 (3x+2y+6) \leq \sqrt{3^2+4^2+6^2} \sqrt{x^2+y^2+1} = 7\sqrt{x^2+y^2+1}.
a.b = cos t |a| |b, where cos t is the angle between the vectors.

So a.b = |a| |b if and only if cos t = 1.
So we require 3I+2J+6K and xI+yJ+1 to be in the same direction. So x = 3/6, y=2/6, or x = 1/2, y=1/3.


(a) is easier if you take the origin to be one of the vertices.
An alternative solution for III/4
Taking the equations of the two tangents to be py=x+ap2, qy=x+aq2 py=x+ap^2,\ qy=x+aq^2
They intersect the directrix where y=ap2ap and y=aq2aqy=\frac{ap^2-a}{p} \mathrm{\ and\ }y=\frac{aq^2-a}{q} respectively.
So ap2apaq2aq=lap2qaq+apq2ap=pql \frac{ap^2-a}{p}-\frac{aq^2-a}{q}=l \Rightarrow ap^2q-aq+apq^2-ap=pql
a(pq)+apq(pq)=pqla(pq)(1+pq)=pql \Rightarrow a(p-q)+apq(p-q)=pql \Rightarrow a(p-q)(1+pq)=pql
The tangents intersect where q(x+ap2)=p(x+aq2)(pq)x=apq(pq)x=apq, y=a(p+q) q(x+ap^2)=p(x+aq^2) \Rightarrow (p-q)x=apq(p-q) \Rightarrow x=apq,\ y=a(p+q)
Unparseable latex formula:

pq=\frac{x}{a},\ p+q=\frac{y}{a},\ p-q=\sqrt((p+q)^2-4pq)=\sqrt((\frac{y}{a})^2-\frac{4x}a})=\frac{1}{a}\sqrt(y^2-4ax)


Subbing in a(pq)(1+pq)=pqla(p-q)(1+pq)=pql we thus have (y24ax)(1+xa)=xal \sqrt(y^2-4ax)(1+\frac{x}{a})=\frac{x}{a}l
Squaring both sides then gives the required result.
Original post by brianeverit
(a) is easier if you take the origin to be one of the vertices.
I prefer having the symmetry (i.e. not having a favoured vertex), but it's probably a case where the stylistic preference does result in slightly more writing.
Original post by ben-smith
STEP III Q11
dxdt=k/αz,dzdt=kz=kt+h[br]dxdt=kα(kt+h)[br]x=k/α(1kln(kt+h)+C).[br]t=0,x=0C=lnhk[br]αx=ln(kth+1)t=hk(eαx1) \frac{dx}{dt}=k/\alpha z ,\frac{dz}{dt}=k \Rightarrow z=kt+h[br]\Rightarrow \frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{k}{\alpha(kt+h)} [br]\Rightarrow x=k/ \alpha(\frac{1}{k}ln(kt+h)+C). [br]t=0, x=0 \Rightarrow C=-\frac{lnh}{k}[br]\therefore \alpha x=ln(\frac{kt}{h}+1) \Rightarrow t=\frac{h}{k}(e^{\alpha x}-1)
as required.
For the second plough:
z=k(time it takes for 2nd plough to go y metres-time taken for first plough to reach y)
=k(t(eαy1)hkk(t-(e^{\alpha y}-1)\frac{h}{k}
is there a closing bracket missing here.
And since
dydt=k/αz1/αdtdz=z/k=t(eαy1)hk\frac{dy}{dt}=k/\alpha z \Rightarrow 1/ \alpha \frac{dt}{dz}=z/k= t-(e^{\alpha y}-1)\frac{h}{k}
As required.
Differentiating this with respect to time we get:
Differentiating what with respect to t?
1/αdtdz[br]=1/α(hαkeαy+αeαy(Tαhyk)hαkeαy)=eαy(Tαhyk)=(eαy1)hk+eαy(Tαhyk)eαy(Tαhyk)=t(eαy1)hk1/ \alpha \frac{dt}{dz}[br]=1/ \alpha (\frac{h\alpha}{k}e^{\alpha y}+ \alpha e^{\alpha y}(T-\frac{\alpha hy}{k})-\frac{h\alpha}{k}e^{\alpha y})=e^{\alpha y}(T-\frac{\alpha hy}{k})=(e^{\alpha y}-1)\frac{h}{k}+e^{\alpha y}(T-\frac{\alpha hy}{k})-e^{\alpha y}(T-\frac{\alpha hy}{k})=t-(e^{\alpha y}-1)\frac{h}{k}
I don't understand how this last step follows.
Which means it is a solution as it satisfies the equation.
They will collide when their times are equal and x=y. Notice how the time for second plough is the same as the one for the 1st +eαy(Tαhyk)+e^{\alpha y}(T-\frac{\alpha hy}{k})
This should disappear when they collide so:
Tαhxk=0x=TkαhT-\frac{\alpha hx}{k}=0 \Rightarrow x=\frac{Tk}{\alpha h}
As required.


Please see comments in red.
Original post by ben-smith
Q12
A, B and C form a triangle. Let the angle at A be theta and the angle a C be phi. Let us further denote D to be the point on CB that also lies on the line perpendicular to CB and goes through A and T is the tension in the string.
The rod is in equilibrium so the forces vertically and the moments about A are balanced:
Unparseable latex formula:

Mg=Tcos\phi[br]T(AD)=(L/2)sin\thetaMg


To find AD, notice that the are of triangle is 1/2(αL(AD))1/2(\alpha L (AD)) and also 12L2αsin(π(θ+ϕ)) \frac{1}{2}L^2\alpha sin(\pi-(\theta+\phi)).
Equating the two, we get:
AD=Lsin(θ+ϕ)AD=Lsin(\theta+\phi)
Substituting in from our first equations:
Unparseable latex formula:

TLsin(\theta+\phi)=(L/2)sin\thetaMg \Rightarrow sin(\theta+\phi)=\frac{sin\thetacos\phi}{2}[br]\Rightarrow sin\theta cos\phi+cos\theta sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta cos\phi}{2}[br]\Rightarrow cos\theta sin\phi=-\frac{sin\theta cos\phi}{2}


By the sine rule:
sinϕL=sinθαLsinϕ=sinθα\frac{sin\phi}{L}=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha L}\Rightarrow sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha}
So:
sinθcosθα=sinθα2sin2θ2α2cosθ=α2sin2θ[br]4cos2θ=α2sin2θcos2θ=α213\frac{sin\theta cos\theta }{\alpha}=-\frac{sin\theta \sqrt{\alpha^2-sin^2\theta}}{2\alpha} \Rightarrow 2cos\theta=-\sqrt{\alpha^2-sin^2\theta}[br]\Rightarrow 4cos^2\theta=\alpha^2-sin^2\theta \Rightarrow cos^2\theta=\frac{\alpha^2-1}{3}
The function cos2θ cos^2\theta is greater that or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 1 but, in this case, we don't want the equality case as that would mean A, B and C would be collinear so:
1<α<21<\alpha<2
To find the tension:
T=Mgcosϕ[br]sinϕ=sinθαcosϕ=1/α(α24α23)=2α(α213)1/2 T=\frac{Mg}{cos\phi}[br]sin\phi=\frac{sin\theta}{\alpha} \Rightarrow cos\phi = 1/ \alpha(\sqrt{\alpha^2-\frac{4-\alpha^2}{3}})=\frac{2}{\alpha}(\frac{\alpha^2-1}{3})^{1/2}
So:
T=Mgcosϕ)=Mgα2(3α21)1/2T=\frac{Mg}{cos\phi)}=\frac{Mg \alpha}{2} (\frac{3}{\alpha^2-1})^{1/2}
As required.


The angle between the rod and the vertical can be found very much more easily by elementary trigonometry as follows.
Since there are only 3 forces acting on the rod they must be concurrent and since rod is uniform it follows that D and B are the mid-points of AC and CE respectively. (see diagram)
Hence sinϕ=AEαL and sinθ=AELsinθ=αsinϕ \sin \phi=\frac{AE}{\alpha L} \mathrm{\ and\ } \sin \theta=\frac{AE}{L} \Rightarrow \sin \theta=\alpha \sin \phi
Unparseable latex formula:

\cos \phi=\frac{CE}{\alpha L} \mathrm{\ and\z } \cos \theta=\frac{BE}{L} \Rightarrow \cos \theta=\frac{\alpha}{2}\cos \phi


Hence, 1α2sin2θ+4α2cos2θ=sin2ϕ+cos2ϕ=1 \frac{1}{\alpha^2}\sin^2 \theta+\frac{4}{\alpha^2} \cos^2 \theta=\sin^2 \phi+\cos^2 \phi=1
sin2θ+4cos2θ=11cos2θ+4cos2θ=13cos2θ=α21\Rightarrow \sin^2 \theta+4\cos^2 \theta=1 \Rightarrow 1-\cos^2 \theta+4\cos^2 \theta=1 \Rightarrow 3\cos^2 \theta=\alpha^2-1
Unparseable latex formula:

\Rightarrow \theta=\cos^{-1} \sqrt \Left(\frac{\alpha^2-1}{3}\Right)

Original post by DFranklin
STEP III, Q16:

(i) If XiX_i is the number of extra children needed for the ith male child (that is, the number of children since the i-1th male child), then C = X_1 + ... + X_r, and so E[C] = E[X_1]+...+E[X_r]. The X_i are iid geometric distributions with p = 1/2, so E[X_i] = 2 and C = 2r.

(ii) Suppose the king ignores the rules and just has 2r-1 children. If he has r or more boys, clearly C < 2r, and conversely, if he has < r boys, C>=2r.
So P(C < 2r) = P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children). Since boys and girls are equally likely, P(there are at least r girls from 2r-1 children) = P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children).
But these two events are mutually exclusive, and 1 of them must occur. So P(there are at least r girls from 2r-1 children) = 1 - P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children).
So P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children) = 1 - P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children), and so P(there are at least r boys from 2r-1 children) = 1/2. That is, P(C < 2r) = 1/2.


Shouldn't that be E[C]=2r at the end of part (i)?
Original post by brianeverit
Shouldn't that be E[C]=2r at the end of part (i)?
Yesl.
Specimen Paper II
7.
Unparseable latex formula:

I=\int_0^{\lnK}=\Sigma_{r=1}^K[(r-1)(\lnr-\ln(r-1)]


=(ln2ln1)+2(ln3ln2)+3(ln4ln3)+...+(K1)(lnKln(K1)=(\ln2-\ln1)+2(\ln3-\ln2)+3(\ln4-\ln3)+...+(K-1)( \ln K-\ln(K-1)
=(K1)lnK(ln2+ln3+ln4+...+ln(K1))=(K-1) \ln K-(\ln2+\ln3+\ln4+...+\ln(K-1))
Unparseable latex formula:

=K \ln K-(\ln2+\ln3+\ln4+...+\lnK)=K \ln K-\ln(K!)


=NlnKln(N!)=N \ln K-\ln{(N!)} if N=KN=|K|
Original post by Farhan.Hanif93

STEP I - Q11


in part a i keep on getting mg/(1-root2 mu-2mu) inthe first part the friction between the cylinder and the pushing object, which way is it acting i thought it is acting directly dowward perpendicular to the resultant at p is acting. Can a diagram be drawn please. It will make my day i keep on amking a little mistake somewhere and i think its to do with my frictional force at the left side of the circle!!!!!!!
STEP I - Q5 (I'm aware there is already a solution, but mine may be slightly different in some respects)

Spoiler

(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 95
Specimen Paper I - Q1 (first STEP question ever!)

a) Completing the square we have (y+8x)264x2+4x2+24x=0(y+8x)^2-64x^2+4x^2+24x=0, and so (y+8x)2=60x224x(y+8x)^2=60x^2-24x. This implies 12x(5x2)012x(5x-2) \geq 0 which leads to x2/5x \geq 2/5 or x0x \leq 0. Similarly, to find restrictions on yy, we wish to write the equation in the form [f(x,y)]2=g(y)[f(x,y)]^2=g(y), meaning g(y)0g(y) \geq 0. Writing the original equation in the form 4x2+8x(2y+3)+y2=04x^2+8x(2y+3)+y^2=0 we have, once again, by completing the square that (2x+(4y+6))2(4y+6)2+y2=0(2x+(4y+6))^2-(4y+6)^2+y^2=0. Rearranging and expanding eventually yields (5y+6)(y+2)0(5y+6)(y+2) \geq 0 and therefore y6/5y \geq -6/5 or y2y \leq -2.

b) First, decompose into partial fractions. This is quite standard and yields 9(2x)2(1+x)=11+x+12x+3(2x)2\frac{9}{(2-x)^2(1+x)}=\frac{1}{1+x}+\frac{1}{2-x}+\frac{3}{(2-x)^2}. 11+x\frac{1}{1+x} can be written as 11(x)\frac{1}{1-(-x)}, which is an infinite geometric series with first term 1 and common ratio x-x, valid for x<1|x|<1. Hence, the coefficient of xnx^n for this fraction is simply (1)n(-1)^n. Similarly, 12x\frac{1}{2-x} can be written as 1/21(x/2)\frac{1/2}{1-(x/2)}, which is an infinite geometric series with first term 1/2 and common ratio x/2x/2, valid for x<2|x|<2. It is not hard to see that the coefficient of xnx^n for this fraction is 12n+1\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}. Lastly, it could be shown that 3(2x)2=(3/4)(1(x2))23(2-x)^{-2}=(3/4)(1-(\frac{x}{2}))^{-2}. Using the expansion of (1+x)n(1+x)^n we obtain the coefficient for this fraction as (3/4)(1/2)n((2)(3)...(2n+1)n!)(3/4)(-1/2)^n(\frac{(-2)(-3)...(-2-n+1)}{n!}) (the last bracket is, in a way, (2n)\displaystyle \binom{-2}{n}). Putting everything together, the coefficient of xnx^n of the original fraction is (1)n+12n+1+(3/4)(1/2)n((2)(3)...(2n+1)n!(-1)^n+\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}+(3/4)(-1/2)^n(\frac{(-2)(-3)...(-2-n+1)}{n!}. This could be simlified further as (2)(3)...(2n+1)=(n+1)!(1)n(-2)(-3)...(-2-n+1)=(n+1)!(-1)^n, and so (3/4)(1/2)n((2)(3)...(2n+1)n!)=(3/4)(n+1)2n(3/4)(-1/2)^n(\frac{(-2)(-3)...(-2-n+1)}{n!})=\frac{(3/4)(n+1)}{2^n}. The final answer is (1)n+12n+1+(3/4)(n+1)2n(-1)^n+\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}+\frac{(3/4)(n+1)}{2^n}.

This is valid for x<2|x|<2 (not 100% sure about this).
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 96
Original post by MTripos
x.


A slightly different way of doing part a):

Treating the equation as a quadratic in y we have

y2+16xy+4x(x+6)=0 y^2 + 16xy + 4x(x+6) = 0

Since it is given that y is real, the discriminant is greater than or equal to zero. That is,
(16x)216x(x+6)0 (16x)^2 - 16x(x+6) \geq 0

16x(15x6)0\Rightarrow 16x(15x-6) \geq 0

x0 \Rightarrow x \leq 0 or x25x \geq \frac{2}{5} as required

Similarly, treating the equation as a quadratic in x gives

4x2+8(2y+3)x+y2=0 4x^2 + 8(2y+3)x + y^2 = 0

It is given that x is also real, hence

64(2y+3)216y2064(2y+3)^2 - 16y^2 \geq 0

5y2+16y+120 \Rightarrow 5y^2 + 16y + 12 \geq 0

Unparseable latex formula:

\Rightarrow (5y+6)(y+2) \feq 0



y2 \Rightarrow y \leq -2 or y65 y \geq \frac{-6}{5}
Reply 97
(edited 4 years ago)
Reply 98
Q1,2,3,7,10,11,14 are finished by braineverit, Q9 can be found on the STEP vector module
13,16 can be found on the Stephen SIklos book
(edited 4 years ago)
Reply 99
Q4
(a)

Spoiler


(b)

Spoiler

(edited 4 years ago)

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending