The Student Room Group

PAT 2009 Solutions

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by Benniboi1
Ohhh I see! :biggrin:

for Q22 i used a = (v^2)/r and got A, hard question for 1 mark!!


yep :tongue:
For Q24:

Let l,c,vl, c, v be the ship's length, number of crews and cargo capacity respectively.

From the qn, c=kl2c=kl^2 and v=ml3v=ml^3

1. As a quizzer and a roodle taken together have the same length as two pangs, lq+lr=2lplq=2lplr l_q + l_r = 2l_p \Leftrightarrow l_q = 2l_p - l_r

2. As the crew of a quizzer is just sufficient to provide crew for two pangs and a roodle, cq=2cp+crklq2=2klp2+klr2lq2=2lp2+lr2 c_q =2c_p + c_r \Rightarrow k{l_q}^2 = 2k{l_p}^2 + k{l_r}^2 \Rightarrow{l_q}^2 = 2{l_p}^2 + {l_r}^2

Finding vq=mlq3v_q=m{l_q}^3,

Using 1.: lq3=(2lplr)3=8lp312lp2lr+6lplr2lr3{l_q}^3 = (2l_p - l_r)^3 =8{l_p}^3 - 12{l_p}^2l_r + 6l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

Using 1. and 2.: lq3=(2lplr)(2lp2+lr2)=4lp32lp2lr+2lplr2lr3{l_q}^3 = (2l_p - l_r)(2{l_p}^2 + {l_r}^2)=4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2l_r + 2l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

Note that constant m is missing in both equations because both sides of the equation have constant m.

Comparing both equations of lq3{l_q}^3 ,

8lp312lp2lr+6lplr2lr3=4lp32lp2lr+2lplr2lr38{l_p}^3 - 12{l_p}^2l_r + 6l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3=4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2l_r + 2l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

4lp310lp2lr+4lplr2=0 4{l_p}^3 - 10{l_p}^2l_r + 4l_p{l_r}^2=0

2lp(2lp25lplr+2lr2)=0 2l_p(2{l_p}^2 - 5{l_p}l_r + 2{l_r}^2)=0

(2lplr)(lp2lr)=02lp=lr,lp=2lr (2l_p - l_r)(l_p - 2l_r) = 0 \Rightarrow 2l_p = l_r, l_p=2l_r

Recall that a quizzer and a roodle taken together have the same length as two pangs? It is impossible for 2lp=lr 2l_p = l_r , which is the length of 2 pangs is equal to the length of a roodle, then.

Since lp=2lrl_p=2l_r, using back the 2nd derived lq3{l_q}^3 equation to find the number of pangs and roodles needed to match the cargo capacity of a quizzer,

lq3=4lp32lp2(0.5lr)+2(2lr)lr2lr3=4lp3lp3+4lr3lr3=3lp3+3lr3{l_q}^3 = 4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2(0.5l_r) + 2(2l_r){l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3 = 4{l_p}^3 - {l_p}^3 + 4{l_r}^3 - {l_r}^3 = 3{l_p}^3 + 3{l_r}^3

Thus, 3 pangs and 3 roodles are needed.

I feel that this is the most difficult qn in the paper.
Reply 42
Original post by superkinetic
For Q24:

Let l,c,vl, c, v be the ship's length, number of crews and cargo capacity respectively.

From the qn, c=kl2c=kl^2 and v=ml3v=ml^3

1. As a quizzer and a roodle taken together have the same length as two pangs, lq+lr=2lplq=2lplr l_q + l_r = 2l_p \Leftrightarrow l_q = 2l_p - l_r

2. As the crew of a quizzer is just sufficient to provide crew for two pangs and a roodle, cq=2cp+crklq2=2klp2+klr2lq2=2lp2+lr2 c_q =2c_p + c_r \Rightarrow k{l_q}^2 = 2k{l_p}^2 + k{l_r}^2 \Rightarrow{l_q}^2 = 2{l_p}^2 + {l_r}^2

Finding vq=mlq3v_q=m{l_q}^3,

Using 1.: lq3=(2lplr)3=8lp312lp2lr+6lplr2lr3{l_q}^3 = (2l_p - l_r)^3 =8{l_p}^3 - 12{l_p}^2l_r + 6l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

Using 1. and 2.: lq3=(2lplr)(2lp2+lr2)=4lp32lp2lr+2lplr2lr3{l_q}^3 = (2l_p - l_r)(2{l_p}^2 + {l_r}^2)=4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2l_r + 2l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

Note that constant m is missing in both equations because both sides of the equation have constant m.

Comparing both equations of lq3{l_q}^3 ,

8lp312lp2lr+6lplr2lr3=4lp32lp2lr+2lplr2lr38{l_p}^3 - 12{l_p}^2l_r + 6l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3=4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2l_r + 2l_p{l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3

4lp310lp2lr+4lplr2=0 4{l_p}^3 - 10{l_p}^2l_r + 4l_p{l_r}^2=0

2lp(2lp25lplr+2lr2)=0 2l_p(2{l_p}^2 - 5{l_p}l_r + 2{l_r}^2)=0

(2lplr)(lp2lr)=02lp=lr,lp=2lr (2l_p - l_r)(l_p - 2l_r) = 0 \Rightarrow 2l_p = l_r, l_p=2l_r

Recall that a quizzer and a roodle taken together have the same length as two pangs? It is impossible for 2lp=lr 2l_p = l_r , which is the length of 2 pangs is equal to the length of a roodle, then.

Since lp=2lrl_p=2l_r, using back the 2nd derived lq3{l_q}^3 equation to find the number of pangs and roodles needed to match the cargo capacity of a quizzer,

lq3=4lp32lp2(0.5lr)+2(2lr)lr2lr3=4lp3lp3+4lr3lr3=3lp3+3lr3{l_q}^3 = 4{l_p}^3 - 2{l_p}^2(0.5l_r) + 2(2l_r){l_r}^2 - {l_r}^3 = 4{l_p}^3 - {l_p}^3 + 4{l_r}^3 - {l_r}^3 = 3{l_p}^3 + 3{l_r}^3

Thus, 3 pangs and 3 roodles are needed.

I feel that this is the most difficult qn in the paper.


Clever :tongue:
Original post by superkinetic
...


Original post by wcp100
...


Hey there guys! I would like to join in... :biggrin:

Q 19:

F=Kv2AF = Kv^2A

Rearranging to make KK the subject:

K=Fv2AK = \dfrac{F}{v^2A}

The equation must be dimensionally homogeneous, that is the LHS and RHS must have the same dimensions. Thus dimensional analysis can be used to compare the two sides and therefore determine the dimensions of KK.

The SI unit of force is kgms2kgms^{-2}, velocity is ms1ms^{-1}, and area is m2m^2

Let the dimension of mass be MM, the dimension of length be LL, and the dimension of time be TT. Take square brackets to mean "the dimensions of".

K=Fv2AK = \dfrac{F}{v^2A}

[K]=[F][v]2[A][K] = \dfrac{[F]}{[v]^2[A]}

[K]=MLT2(LT1)2L2[K] = \dfrac{MLT^{-2} }{(LT^{-1})^2L^2}

[K]=MLT2L2T2L2[K] = \dfrac{MLT^{-2} }{L^2T^{-2}L^2}

[K]=MLT2L4T2[K] = \dfrac{MLT^{-2} }{L^4T^{-2} }

[K]=ML14T2(2)[K] = ML^{1-4}T^{-2-(-2)}

[K]=ML3[K] = ML^{-3}


KK has the dimensions of mass per unit volume, \therefore is a density (option D).
(edited 12 years ago)
Q 18. (I assume the reason there isn't solution for this one up is that no-one could be bothered? :tongue:)

Basically all that needs to be done is rearrange the equation for mass then stick in the numbers, do some arithmetic and hey presto:

t=dm2qUt = d\sqrt {\dfrac{m}{2qU} }

t2=d2×m2qUt^2 = d^2 \times \dfrac{m}{2qU}

2t2qU=d2m2t^2qU = d^2m

m=2t2qUd2m = \dfrac{2t^2qU}{d^2}

Time for the numbers, but first:

30μs=30×106s30\mu s = 30 \times 10^{-6}s

16kV=1.6×104V16kV = 1.6 \times 10^4V

m=2×(30×106)2×1.6×1019×1.6×1041.52 kgm = \dfrac{2 \times (30 \times 10^{-6})^2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{1.5^2}\ kg

=2×900×1012×1.6×1019×1.6×1042.25 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 10^{-12} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{2.25}\ kg

=2×900×1.6×1.6×1012×1019×10494 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 1.6 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-12} \times 10^{-19} \times 10^4 }{\dfrac{9}{4} }\ kg

=2×900×49×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 900 \times \dfrac{4}{9} \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2×400×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 400 \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=8×256×1027 kg= 8 \times 256 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2048×1027 kg= 2048 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2.048×1024 kg= 2.048 \times 10^{-24}\ kg

=2.0×1024kg  (2 sig. figs.)= 2.0 \times 10^{-24} kg\ \ (2\ sig.\ figs.)

So D is the correct one.
(edited 12 years ago)
Q 17.

At the top of the drop, the water has gravitational potential energy.

G.P.E.=mgh=m×10×105=(1050×Mass)JG.P.E. = mgh = m \times 10 \times 105 = (1050 \times Mass) J

As it falls, gravitational potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. Assume energy is not lost via friction etc.. The water has 0 gravitational potential energy at the bottom of the fall and maximum kinetic energy, which is equal to the change in gravitational potential energy.

Energy at bottom of pothole =(1050×Mass)JEnergy\ at\ bottom\ of\ pothole\ = (1050 \times Mass) J

Now, to find the temperature change, use the formula:

Energy=Mass×Specific Heat Capacity×Temperature ChangeEnergy = Mass \times Specific\ Heat\ Capacity \times Temperature\ Change

Rearrange:

Temperature Change=EnergyMass×Specific Heat CapacityTemperature\ Change = \dfrac{Energy}{Mass \times Specific\ Heat\ Capacity}

Specific Heat Capacity=4.2kJkg1K1Specific\ Heat\ Capacity = 4.2kJ kg^{-1}K^{-1}

Put the numbers in:

Temperature Change=1050×MassMass×4.2×103 CTemperature\ Change = \dfrac{1050 \times Mass}{Mass \times 4.2 \times 10^3}\ ^{\circ}C

Mass cancels out:

Temperature Change=10504200 CTemperature\ Change = \dfrac{1050}{4200}\ ^{\circ}C

Now, it says estimate, so round to nearest 1000:

Temperature Change=10004000 CTemperature\ Change = \dfrac{1000}{4000}\ ^{\circ}C

=0.25C= 0.25^{\circ}C

So B is the correct answer.
Reply 46
Original post by Maths_Lover
Q 18. (I assume the reason there isn't solution for this one up is that no-one could be bothered? :tongue:)

Basically all that needs to be done is rearrange the equation for mass then stick in the numbers, do some arithmetic and hey presto:

t=dm2qUt = d\sqrt {\dfrac{m}{2qU} }

t2=d2×m2qUt^2 = d^2 \times \dfrac{m}{2qU}

2t2qU=d2m2t^2qU = d^2m

m=2t2qUd2m = \dfrac{2t^2qU}{d^2}

Time for the numbers, but first:

30μs=30×106s30\mu s = 30 \times 10^{-6}s

16kV=1.6×104V16kV = 1.6 \times 10^4V

m=2×(30×106)2×1.6×1019×1.6×1041.52 kgm = \dfrac{2 \times (30 \times 10^{-6})^2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{1.5^2}\ kg

=2×900×1012×1.6×1019×1.6×1042.25 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 10^{-12} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{2.25}\ kg

=2×900×1.6×1.6×1012×1019×10494 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 1.6 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-12} \times 10^{-19} \times 10^4 }{\dfrac{9}{4} }\ kg

=2×900×49×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 900 \times \dfrac{4}{9} \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2×400×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 400 \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=8×256×1027 kg= 8 \times 256 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2048×1027 kg= 2048 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2.048×1024 kg= 2.048 \times 10^{-24}\ kg

=2.0×1024kg  (2 sig. figs.)= 2.0 \times 10^{-24} kg\ \ (2\ sig.\ figs.)

So D is the correct one.


Check you formally working it out. I jotted it down with two lines of working:P

+ Mental time to be up on a saturday!
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Maths_Lover
Q 18. (I assume the reason there isn't solution for this one up is that no-one could be bothered? :tongue:)

Basically all that needs to be done is rearrange the equation for mass then stick in the numbers, do some arithmetic and hey presto:

t=dm2qUt = d\sqrt {\dfrac{m}{2qU} }

t2=d2×m2qUt^2 = d^2 \times \dfrac{m}{2qU}

2t2qU=d2m2t^2qU = d^2m

m=2t2qUd2m = \dfrac{2t^2qU}{d^2}

Time for the numbers, but first:

30μs=30×106s30\mu s = 30 \times 10^{-6}s

16kV=1.6×104V16kV = 1.6 \times 10^4V

m=2×(30×106)2×1.6×1019×1.6×1041.52 kgm = \dfrac{2 \times (30 \times 10^{-6})^2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{1.5^2}\ kg

=2×900×1012×1.6×1019×1.6×1042.25 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 10^{-12} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 1.6 \times 10^4 }{2.25}\ kg

=2×900×1.6×1.6×1012×1019×10494 kg= \dfrac{2 \times 900 \times 1.6 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-12} \times 10^{-19} \times 10^4 }{\dfrac{9}{4} }\ kg

=2×900×49×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 900 \times \dfrac{4}{9} \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2×400×2.56×1027 kg= 2 \times 400 \times 2.56 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=8×256×1027 kg= 8 \times 256 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2048×1027 kg= 2048 \times 10^{-27}\ kg

=2.048×1024 kg= 2.048 \times 10^{-24}\ kg

=2.0×1024kg  (2 sig. figs.)= 2.0 \times 10^{-24} kg\ \ (2\ sig.\ figs.)

So D is the correct one.


That is some hardcore latexing
Original post by wcp100
Check you formally working it out. I jotted it down with two lines of working:P

+ Mental time to be up on a saturday!


I like my workings formal. :lol:

I am always up at mental times... :ninja:

Original post by Emissionspectra
That is some hardcore latexing


Yeah... it took a while...
Original post by Maths_Lover
I like my workings formal. :lol:

I am always up at mental times... :ninja:



Yeah... it took a while...


:biggrin:, how you anyway?
Reply 50
I'll take a punt at 25...I have never studied circuits like this....

Total resistance:

r=1000ohm resistance.

R=5r8+125R=\dfrac{5r}{8}+125

R=50008+125=750R=\dfrac{5000}{8}+125=750
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Emissionspectra
:biggrin:, how you anyway?


Spoiler



Original post by wcp100
I'll take a punt at 25...I have never studied circuits like this....

Total resistance:

r=1000ohm resistance.

R=5r8+125R=\dfrac{5r}{8}+125

R=50008+125=750R=\dfrac{5000}{8}+125=750


Circuits are my weakest area, so I have no idea about 25. :tongue:

I have however just completed 26. I will type it up in a minute. :cute:
Reply 52
Original post by Maths_Lover


Circuits are my weakest area, so I have no idea about 25. :tongue:

I have however just completed 26. I will type it up in a minute. :cute:


Yeh....I haven't even covered this. I do unit 2 first:P

I'm winging it. I can't do the second half though.....

superkinetic
...
Reply 53
The work done by an electron moving through a potential difference of 50v :

1.6×1019×10×5=8×1018 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 10 \times 5 = 8 \times 10^{-18}

W=Fs W=Fs

8×10180.4×1030=a,a=2×1013 \dfrac{8 \times 10^{-18}}{0.4 \times 10^{-30}}= a, a=2 \times 10^{13}

t=0.82×1013 t=\sqrt{\frac{0.8}{2 \times 10^{13}}}

s=ut+12at2 s= ut + \frac{1}{2} at^2

s=12×10×4×1014 s= \frac{1}{2} \times 10 \times 4 \times 10^{-14}

2×1013m 2 \times 10^{-13}m
(edited 12 years ago)
Q 26. I realise now that I may have misinterpreted the question. :getmecoat:

This method below is for the electron being accelerated on it's way to the screen rather than already having been accelerated beforehand:

Spoiler

(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by wcp100
The work done by an electron moving through a potential difference of 50v :

1.6×1019×10×5=8×1018 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 10 \times 5 = 8 \times 10^{-18}

W=Fs W=Fs

8×10180.4×1030=a,a=2×1013 \dfrac{8 \times 10^{-18}}{0.4 \times 10^{-30}}= a, a=2 \times 10^{13}

a=st2 a= \frac{s}{t^2}

t=0.42×1013 t=\sqrt{\frac{0.4}{2 \times 10^{13}}}

s=ut+12at2 s= ut + \frac{1}{2} at^2

s=12×10×2×1014 s= \frac{1}{2} \times 10 \times 2 \times 10^{-14}

1×1013m 1 \times 10^{-13}m


I got a slightly different answer for this...
Reply 56
I agree with ML's answer. I think you, wcp, have put a 2 where it should be 0.4 in your last line of working :wink2:
Original post by ElMoro
I agree with ML's answer. I think you, wcp, have put a 2 where it should be 0.4 in your last line of working :wink2:


Always appearing out of nowhere. :lol:
Can't believe that question is only worth 5 marks... :lolwut:
Reply 59
Original post by ElMoro
I agree with ML's answer. I think you, wcp, have put a 2 where it should be 0.4 in your last line of working :wink2:


You mean 4.....

Quick Reply

Latest