The Student Room Group

DEMOTED For Not Backing Gay Marriage

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Trigger
I was thinking love thy neighbour and judge no less thy be judged. We will gloss over that you are not allowed near menstruating women, cannot touch pork and can't eat shellfish as that is all too, immoral.


:h:


I do none of those things.
Reply 121
Original post by chrislpp
I do none of those things.


I find that hard to believe.
Reply 122
The Daily Mail is the worst ****ing paper in the world. **** you if you take it seriously.
Original post by somethingbeautiful
No, they really shouldn't. If that was the case then people would be allowed to rape/murder/steal/shout racial abuse etc in 'their own time' and still keep their jobs. So what you really mean is ''within reason'' people ought to be allowed to do/say what they want without it affecting their jobs. This whole discussion revolves around the ''within reason" part. What you see as being an acceptable thing to say/do may not be what someone else thinks is acceptable.


It goes without saying that I was referring to legal activities. You aren't going to be arrested for disagreeing with gay marriage.
Original post by limetang
You should care. This is a blatant attack on free speech. You either believe in free speech for all, even those with views you cannot stand. Or you don't believe in it at all.


Yeah but it's free speech being used in a stupid way so I really don't care. This sort of thing is no different in principle to saying blacks should not be allowed to marry. Would you support that?
Original post by SwingOnTheSpiral88
Yeah but it's free speech being used in a stupid way so I really don't care. This sort of thing is no different in principle to saying blacks should not be allowed to marry. Would you support that?


I wouldn't support the sentiment, but I'd support the persons right to say it. I believe that in a democracy we should have the freedom to say what we want. If we start censoring people we are approaching a very dangerous area. and so long as what he said in private wasn't going to affect the way he behaved at work I see no reason for him to have been demoted.
Original post by limetang
I wouldn't support the sentiment, but I'd support the persons right to say it. I believe that in a democracy we should have the freedom to say what we want. If we start censoring people we are approaching a very dangerous area. and so long as what he said in private wasn't going to affect the way he behaved at work I see no reason for him to have been demoted.


see I think these days we pander to stupidity/ignorance far too much. I don't like the current attitude that just because someone believes something then it automatically deserves respect. Stupidity & ignorance are at the root of every problem the world has and I think there's too much of it around to just keep letting people get away with it.
Original post by SwingOnTheSpiral88
see I think these days we pander to stupidity/ignorance far too much. I don't like the current attitude that just because someone believes something then it automatically deserves respect. Stupidity & ignorance are at the root of every problem the world has and I think there's too much of it around to just keep letting people get away with it.


I never said it deserved respect. I said that it doesn't deserve censoring by the state (which is what happened here). My point had nothing to do with respect for his beliefs. My point was that it was wrong for the state to punish him for those beliefs. For the state to decide what he could and couldn't say.

Also. "Stupidity & ignorance are at the root of every problem the world has". Not true. While it may be the cause of some problems, I'd argue that greed is a much more significant cause of problems in the world. We're at war in the middle east because of the wests need for oil. We're in a recession because bankers got greedy. I could go on.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by limetang
I never said it deserved respect. I said that it doesn't deserve censoring by the state (which is what happened here). My point had nothing to do with respect for his beliefs. My point was that it was wrong for the state to punish him for those beliefs. For the state to decide what he could and couldn't say.

Also. "Stupidity & ignorance are at the root of every problem the world has". Not true. While it may be the cause of some problems, I'd argue that greed is a much more significant cause of problems in the world. We're at war in the middle east because of the wests need for oil. We're in a recession because bankers got greedy. I could go on.


Even if it is the state censoring it, does that always have to be a bad thing? I mean, look at germany, austria etc. who come down hard on holocaust deniers/nazi sympathisers etc. I can't see a problem with them censoring stupid bull**** like that, and don't see how the state punishing a homophobe for his stupidity is any worse.

Also who's to say greed doesn't come out of ignorance? It's fun to be greedy but maybe certain people would be less greedy if they were more aware of the harm it does? Anyway, even if ignorance isn't at the root of 100% of everything wrong today, it's gotta be at the root of most of it.
Reply 129
He must of known how controversial his statements would of been, so he could of just kept it to himself if he didn't want to cause any trouble !

I'm not jumping to any side of the argument, but seriously this guy just needed to keep his mouth shut !
Original post by SwingOnTheSpiral88
Even if it is the state censoring it, does that always have to be a bad thing? I mean, look at germany, austria etc. who come down hard on holocaust deniers/nazi sympathisers etc. I can't see a problem with them censoring stupid bull**** like that, and don't see how the state punishing a homophobe for his stupidity is any worse.

Also who's to say greed doesn't come out of ignorance? It's fun to be greedy but maybe certain people would be less greedy if they were more aware of the harm it does? Anyway, even if ignorance isn't at the root of 100% of everything wrong today, it's gotta be at the root of most of it.


Most people who are greedy know exactly what harm it does... they just don't care (for the most part).

Now not to sound like a broken record, but to quote Noam Chomsky "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. "

Now I understand that you'd rather people didn't say things like this, and to say that it's okay for what they said to be punished to be censored, because you don't believe with their views is in my opinion wrong. You cannot claim to live in a democracy if any views are actively oppressed by the state, and besides if they start censoring views you hate and nobody opposes it what/who is going to stop them when they slowly start to censor views you agree with.
Original post by limetang
Most people who are greedy know exactly what harm it does... they just don't care (for the most part).

Now not to sound like a broken record, but to quote Noam Chomsky "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. "

Now I understand that you'd rather people didn't say things like this, and to say that it's okay for what they said to be punished to be censored, because you don't believe with their views is in my opinion wrong. You cannot claim to live in a democracy if any views are actively oppressed by the state, and besides if they start censoring views you hate and nobody opposes it what/who is going to stop them when they slowly start to censor views you agree with.


They do censor views I agree with.
Why don't they try and get married at a mosque? Oh yes because everyone knows what will happen to that gay couple :rolleyes:
Original post by SwingOnTheSpiral88
They do censor views I agree with.


You can't care about expressing them too much then if this is your attitude.
that is BULL****. what the hell happened to freedom of speech??!
Original post by limetang
You can't care about expressing them too much then if this is your attitude.


if I was to freely express them it would negatively affect my life, I'd probably end up unemployed if the people who employ me knew how I spend my free time.

Quick Reply

Latest