Highest requirements.
Discuss current events and changes in the education system and ways you'd like to see it improved, from secondary school through to postgraduate study.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera | 20-05-2013 | |
-
Re: Highest requirements.Your S1 is pretty impressive. I must say, I'm jealous that your Cam offer only required I+II.(Original post by Slumpy)
You'll also note that this is a totally theoretical discussion for me, having only done I and II
-
Re: Highest requirements.Only actually needed 12. They were well nice to me because I was from Scotland. They upped the offer to II/III by 2 years later though.(Original post by ben-smith)
Your S1 is pretty impressive. I must say, I'm jealous that your Cam offer only required I+II. -
Re: Highest requirements.I know some of the 2007 intake who got SS and they were English. One got 120 and 114 and I assume one of the others was better than that.(Original post by dugdugdug)
Best result I've know and S and 1 is II and III.
I know the stats say 12% get S in III but does anyone actually know anyone who's achieved it or are they all members of the Chinese IMO team? -
Re: Highest requirements.(Original post by DLP90)
They are awful you should just give up now............................. .....People like you on this forum need to give your heads a wobble, you really annoy me.
i don't quit follow what you are trying to say so please explain in a constractive manner.
thank you. -
He's saying they're fine.(Original post by kaboon-supreme)
i don't quit follow what you are trying to say so please explain in a constractive manner.
thank you.
Personally I think they're fine, similar-ish to mine. Getting a B in core science will obviously seem odd but if you get As at AS level in the sciences then they won't care. -
Re: Highest requirements.Basically, you know full well that they aren't bad grades. There are a lot of people who have achieved less than that and have done just fine for themselves, myself included.(Original post by kaboon-supreme)
i don't quit follow what you are trying to say so please explain in a constractive manner.
thank you. -
Re: Highest requirements."She"(Original post by hassi94)
He's saying they're fine.
Personally I think they're fine, similar-ish to mine. Getting a B in core science will obviously seem odd but if you get As at AS level in the sciences then they won't care.
-
Re: Highest requirements.Obviously not STEP I, II and III!(Original post by hassi94)
According to the Maths Applicants 2012 there's someone with an SS offer this year (for Trinity).
One of the people showing us round on the Maths open day at Emma last year had 3 S's and average of 98% in his A-levels
What's Emma? -
Re: Highest requirements.Well, it's not uncommon to sit I in year 12 if you did a full a level, just to get a taste for STEP, so that with a cam offer you'd sit all 3.(Original post by dugdugdug)
Doesn't make sense to sit I, II and III, even in different years, given I and III are purposely on at the same time so they're not expecting anyone to be doing all three.
Anyone know why there's no AEA in Further Maths?
Years ago MEI discontinued it. -
Re: Highest requirements.In that case, wouldn't it make more sense to take I and II in the first year and then concentrate on III in the second year?(Original post by Slumpy)
Well, it's not uncommon to sit I in year 12 if you did a full a level, just to get a taste for STEP, so that with a cam offer you'd sit all 3.
In fact if you did this, you might just get an unconditional offer, if you already had I and II in the bag. -
Re: Highest requirements.II is much harder than I, so not really. To my mind, II and III benefit from you doing both at the same time.(Original post by dugdugdug)
In that case, wouldn't it make more sense to take I and II in the first year and then concentrate on III in the second year?
In fact if you did this, you might just get an unconditional offer, if you already had I and II in the bag.
And I don't see anyone getting an offer on I and II these days, let alone a year early(I know a guy who did II/III in year 12, and he still had to meet the rest of the standard offer in year 13 anyways). -
Re: Highest requirements.STEP I and III are at different times, as of last summer. Warwick asked for them to be at different times, presumably to help those who Firm Cambridge and then put Warwick as their insurance.(Original post by dugdugdug)
Doesn't make sense to sit I, II and III, even in different years, given I and III are purposely on at the same time so they're not expecting anyone to be doing all three.
Anyone know why there's no AEA in Further Maths?
Years ago MEI discontinued it.
There wouldn't be much of a market for AEA in FM, since you'd be looking at the same people as ar doing STEP (and AEA Maths). It would also be an interesting dilemma as to what the specification would be, since there is no common core for FM as there is for the Pure in Maths A level. -
Re: Highest requirements.I am surprised there's no common core in FM. Even more reason to have only one exam board.(Original post by tiny hobbit)
STEP I and III are at different times, as of last summer. Warwick asked for them to be at different times, presumably to help those who Firm Cambridge and then put Warwick as their insurance.
There wouldn't be much of a market for AEA in FM, since you'd be looking at the same people as ar doing STEP (and AEA Maths). It would also be an interesting dilemma as to what the specification would be, since there is no common core for FM as there is for the Pure in Maths A level. -
Re: Highest requirements.Thats interesting because personally i find II the easiest (followed by I and III)(Original post by Slumpy)
II is much harder than I, so not really. To my mind, II and III benefit from you doing both at the same time.
And I don't see anyone getting an offer on I and II these days, let alone a year early(I know a guy who did II/III in year 12, and he still had to meet the rest of the standard offer in year 13 anyways).
)