The Student Room Group

'Man of Mass Destruction'? RT challenges Iraq War architect



...such maniacs are employed in the US government, no wonder...

Scroll to see replies

Does America have any proof that Iran has any nuclear weapons?
Did American have any proof that Iraq had any nuclear weapons?
This man came across as a right moron on the 9/11 anniversary edition of Question Time. Completely outclassed by David Miliband.
Reply 3
Original post by 01010000 01001010
Does America have any proof that Iran has any nuclear weapons?
Did American have any proof that Iraq had any nuclear weapons?


Read the IAEA report, from that its clear that Iran is doing research into nuclear weapons, no one has claimed Iran are currently in possession of nukes.
Original post by Aj12
Read the IAEA report, from that its clear that Iran is doing research into nuclear weapons, no one has claimed Iran are currently in possession of nukes.


There's no new news from the IAEA report, however the tone seems to have changed.
IAEA provided by evidence by intelligence services on Iran, its just fake info to invade Iran for Israel. North korea has nukes we don't see us thinking about war on them, or pakistan, india, israel who all have nukes.
Reply 6
Original post by Munchies-YumYum
There's no new news from the IAEA report, however the tone seems to have changed.


EH? You mean apart from the most recent report that gave evidence that Iran was researching things that could only be to do with a nuclear weapon.
Reply 7
Original post by Study
IAEA provided by evidence by intelligence services on Iran, its just fake info to invade Iran for Israel. North korea has nukes we don't see us thinking about war on them, or pakistan, india, israel who all have nukes.


No ****, Sherlock. If we invade N. Korea, the first thing they would do is raze Seoul to the ground (they wouldn't even need nukes with all the artillery they have pointed at it). Are you starting to see how this works? The point is to not let them get them in the first place.
Original post by G50
No ****, Sherlock. If we invade N. Korea, the first thing they would do is raze Seoul to the ground (they wouldn't even need nukes with all the artillery they have pointed at it). Are you starting to see how this works? The point is to not let them get them in the first place.


I didnt see them wanting to invade pak, india, north korea, israel to stop nukes being made. Face it, if Iran and Israel got along this wouldn't be happening.
Original post by Aj12
EH? You mean apart from the most recent report that gave evidence that Iran was researching things that could only be to do with a nuclear weapon.


I was referring to the latest and the one before that, besides the latest report only contained old allegations. Anyway, who denies them the right to have nukes? What makes the US more responsible they dropped them on Japan after it surrendered. They dropped depleted uranium on Iraqis and now you want to tell me they are morally superior?
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 10
Original post by Munchies-YumYum
I was referring to the latest and the one before that, besides the latest report only contained old allegations. Anyway, who denies them the right to have nukes? What makes the US more responsible they dropped them on Japan after it surrendered. They dropped depleted uranium on Iraqis and now you want to tell me they are morally superior?


What?
Reply 11
Original post by Munchies-YumYum
I was referring to the latest and the one before that, besides the latest report only contained old allegations. Anyway, who denies them the right to have nukes? What makes the US more responsible they dropped them on Japan after it surrendered. They dropped depleted uranium on Iraqis and now you want to tell me they are morally superior?


Erm the treaties Iran has itself signed?

Lol the US dropped nukes AFTER Japan had surrendered? Might want to check your history.

Depleted Uranium:

A recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report giving field measurements taken around selected impact sites in Kosovo (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) indicates that contamination by DU in the environment was localized to a few tens of metres around impact sites. Contamination by DU dusts of local vegetation and water supplies was found to be extremely low. Thus, the probability of significant exposure to local populations was considered to be very low.

No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/
Original post by 01010000 01001010
Does America have any proof that Iran has any nuclear weapons?
Did American have any proof that Iraq had any nuclear weapons?


No they don't but look how the brain washed racist public has negged you!
Original post by Aj12


Depleted Uranium:

A recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report giving field measurements taken around selected impact sites in Kosovo (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) indicates that contamination by DU in the environment was localized to a few tens of metres around impact sites. Contamination by DU dusts of local vegetation and water supplies was found to be extremely low. Thus, the probability of significant exposure to local populations was considered to be very low.

No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/


http://www.thewe.cc/weplanet/news/depleted_uranium_iraq_afghanistan_balkans.html
Original post by Study
I didnt see them wanting to invade pak, india, north korea, israel to stop nukes being made. Face it, if Iran and Israel got along this wouldn't be happening.


Hardly, if it wasn't the second biggest oil reserve in the world, this wouldn't be happening. Pakistan and India both have nukes, and even had conflicts but the world police hasn't got involved.
Reply 17
On what grounds are you calling him a maniac. He made perfect sense. And that interviewer was as thick as two short ones...
Original post by Aj12
EH? You mean apart from the most recent report that gave evidence that Iran was researching things that could only be to do with a nuclear weapon.


Like what?
Reply 19
Original post by King-Panther
Hardly, if it wasn't the second biggest oil reserve in the world, this wouldn't be happening. Pakistan and India both have nukes, and even had conflicts but the world police hasn't got involved.


Wondered how long it would be before some idiot started waffling about oil. Care to provide stats on how much oil the US has got out of invading Iraq? Wanna show how it covers the costs that have run into trillions? :rolleyes:

Here's a tip for you. If you want an Anti-Western conspiracy talk about Arms Companies and the Arms lobbies in America, and then maybe about the reconstruction firms and private miliatry firms. At least there's scope for some sort of intelligent debate there. But this pathetic oil argument is utterly devoid of intellectual value.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending