The Student Room Group

Big man charged with assault for removing fare dodger from train

Scroll to see replies

Reply 120
Original post by lordash
Looks like the kid will potentially be charged with fare evasion as well.

How ironic, the man is being charged because his actions were being seen as disproportionate, but this kid will now potentially be dragged through the criminal justice system, and end up with a criminal record for a crime of 'dishonesty' which will be flagged up for any job he would happen to apply for in the near future.

Suffering a bit of humiliation in being thrown off a train and facing an embarrasing call to the parents / a long walk / a long wait until 6am for the first train -- or having to potentially end up in front of a judge and almost certainly end up with a criminal record (which for many jobs will stay on your record for life).

I think I know which one I would prefer if I was him


Fare evasion is a crime. I am glad that he will experience the consequences of that.
Original post by icedragon
He wasn't trying to explain the situation at all. He was just sitting there telling the inspector to "**** off" and showing him the wrong ticket repeatedly, holding up other passengers and being a generally vile little turd. He wasn't assaulted, he was thrown off the train, as he should have been.


Battery/assault is intimidation or forceful contact. The big man doesn't have to beat him up for it to be assault. He did assault him under UK law.

I do not understand why they didn't just fine him there and then?

I've never seen anyone asked to leave the train for having the wrong/no ticket.
Original post by dobbs
Actually it would take some time - especially if that time is meant to be used doing announcements or actually checking tickets. I've already explained all the problems of trying to get the BTP involved when it's clearly a busy time of day on a busy train on a busy route. As an inspector you expect that if someone doesn't have a ticket you tell them to get off the train and they do, not to have abuse hurled at you.

And I think it's good to see people 'taking the law into their own hands', as I say he WAS too physical, but it would've been fine if him and another passenger had picked him up, taken him off the train, and left him there, rather than actually thrown him out of the doors.

Why as normal citizens should we stand around and let people who have broken the rules and are now infringing on our lives (yes, they are, they are delaying the train which I am on trying to get somewhere) just do as they like? They need to realise they cannot get away with it whilst people sit around and ignore it in that typical "British disapproving way"...no, if you're going to break rules, then people are going to speak up against you or do something about it.


But why should any normal citizen getting on a train back home (probably tired from a long day's work) be expected to take part in escorting an unruly passenger off the train? Even worse, what if that guy had a knife?

Then theres the question of appropriate force used, members of public aren't trained to deal with this sort of thing. I've looked at the video, and to be honest, contrary to what you think it didn't look overtly too physical, considering the kid was struggling back all the way through during that tussle. This is the sort of ambigiuity that passengers would treadover. Why should any citizen have to put themselves in a situation where they are at risk of falling foul of the law and potentially getting themselves injured/killed?
Original post by icedragon
He wasn't trying to explain the situation at all. He was just sitting there telling the inspector to "**** off" and showing him the wrong ticket repeatedly, holding up other passengers and being a generally vile little turd. He wasn't assaulted, he was thrown off the train, as he should have been.


But you werent there at all, also the filming by the video took place after the incident began to start, so we dont know the whole story
Original post by wizzar
It's a good thing that the brute has been charged! Justice has been dealt, we cannot live in a country were the strong oppress the weak, we have laws, and regardless of weather or not the boy was a fare dodger the brute had no right to unceremoniously drag him off the train.
Edit: -12 and +12...the lord giveth and the lord taketh away...


I have to agree totally with that. under no circumstances should he have handled him in such as way although he was just trying to help. if the guy did have a problem with his ticket then he should have brought it up without swearing and in a considerate manner. Although he could have got denied so many times even though he was truthful and it wasnt his fault more of the trainline.

Either way both sides were wrong in parts no matter if the guy was truthful in paying for his train ticket his use of language wasnt appropriate and becoming disrespectful. the big man may have wanted to help but shouldnt have done it in the way he did.

Anyway........Looking forward to Christmas anyone?
At least now he has internet fame!
Reply 126
Original post by Iqbal007
But you werent there at all, also the filming by the video took place after the incident began to start, so we dont know the whole story


In the video you could clearly see the inspector making an attempt to allow him to produce a valid ticket. He couldn't because he didn't have one, so he gave him the wrong ticket.
Original post by maturestudy
Man who assaulted student charged with assault. This is shocking and a total outrage.... oh, wait?! He's a bully and deserves everything he gets.

For what it's worth, the student has been reported for his (totally separate) crime under Section 38 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing Act Scotland.


How is he a bully? Clearly you have no idea what that word even means. The little **** was abusing the system and should have been thrown off the train whilst it was moving.


Original post by wizzar
It's a good thing that the brute has been charged! Justice has been dealt, we cannot live in a country were the strong oppress the weak, we have laws, and regardless of weather or not the boy was a fare dodger the brute had no right to unceremoniously drag him off the train.
Edit: -12 and +12...the lord giveth and the lord taketh away...


The ****er was a thief. He needs to be suppressed. Why do you act like he was innocent?
Reply 128
Original post by dobbs

If you don't have a ticket, you get kicked off. I don't see a problem with this?


And if someone genuinely loses their ticket?

I'm pretty sure the 19 YO was planning to get off at a main station, so getting the BTP involved shouldn't have been a problem when he got there. It would just take one call down the radio wouldn't it?

Just curious here.... do people think that if it was a 6''5 black man, with bulging muscles and tattoos that was giving the 'lip', the big man would've got up and dragged him off too...... or is it just skinny 19 YO brats?

I personally think that he would have just sat in his seat and slowly pee'd himself behind a newspaper held against his face hoping that nobody calls for his help.


Just my view.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 129
I knew it, that stupid idiot who put the video on youtube got everyone in trouble. If common sense and the law disagree, don't screw over the do-gooders by giving lawyers something to feed on.


Original post by amime


Just curious here.... do people think that if it was a 6''5 black man, with bulging muscles and tattoos that was giving the 'lip', the big man would've got up and dragged him off too...... or is it just skinny 19 YO brats?

I personally think that he would have just sat in his seat and slowly pee'd himself behind a newspaper held against his face hoping that nobody calls for his help.


Just my view.


So? You do the right thing when you can. I'd rather people did that than shied away even when they could help.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 130
Original post by amime
And if someone genuinely loses their ticket.


Oh yeah, good point. I guess that anyone who says "Sorry I genuinely lost my ticket" should be believed and allowed to continue on their journey :rolleyes:

Sorry, it doesn't work like that; it is your responsibility to prove that you have bought a ticket, it is not the ticket inspectors' responsibility to prove that you haven't bought a ticket.

Yeah, you're right they probably wouldn't have gone up against someone larger than themselves, and in that case you would wait for the police, but if someone is clearly not going to prove dangerous then why not take them on? Unless, of course, they had a weapon on themselves, but no-one ASKED the big man to get involved, but then he got the train moving and people who had bought tickets on their way.
Reply 131
Original post by WelshBluebird
He is NOT a boy. He is an adult.

He did not show a valid ticket. So yes, he is guilty of that offence.


Indeed. An offence not at all unlike failing to display a valid road fund license. Doesn't matter a damn if you have legitimately bought it. You must display it and not doing so is an offence.

IMO the little **** tried it on, got found out, celebrated the notoriety among his peers of his 5 mins of fame on Youtube and is now claiming to be a victim.
Reply 132
Original post by Hopple


So? You do the right thing when you can. I'd rather people did that than shied away even when they could help.


Help do what exactly?

He didn't do the right thing though, The right thing in this situation is to radio the BTP and have them take him from the train at his stop. (The student was going to a main station as far as im aware so this wouldn't have been a problem.)

Throwing him off clearly didn't help... all that did was turn it from a Civil matter to a criminal one. In the process delaying the train even more, and leading to two possible convictions that could be at a cost to the taxpayer when put through the courts.

Original post by dobbs
Oh yeah, good point. I guess that anyone who says "Sorry I genuinely lost my ticket" should be believed and allowed to continue on their journey



I didn't say that they should be believed, I just think that they should have the opportunity to pay for the ticket when they have money available. Be that though a fine issued when they get to the station or through some other means :sexface:

All throwing people off that have no money does is gets people lost, meaning that they start hassling people an the street at night for train fare or asking randomers to borrow their phone to call help.
(edited 12 years ago)
Good, vigilantes should not be praised.
Don't worry, we in the north have a plan to break him free :wink:

Nah seriously that sucks, although he was pretty rough in ejecting him.
Reply 135
After reading a number of posts on this issue, I can't understand why people are sympathising with the fare evader. I do not like physical violence, but the young man was continually being unruly and aggresive; in these circumstances it is best to have the person off. The man who threw him off of the train acted by what he believed was right and it appeared to be favoured by the passengers. If the 19 year-old didn't want this to happen, you know, he could have just had a valid ticket. :rolleyes:
Reply 136
Original post by amime
Help do what exactly?

He didn't do the right thing though, The right thing in this situation is to radio the BTP and have them take him from the train at his stop. (The student was going to a main station as far as im aware so this wouldn't have been a problem.)

Throwing him off clearly didn't help... all that did was turn it from a Civil matter to a criminal one. In the process delaying the train even more, and leading to two possible convictions that could be at a cost to the taxpayer when put through the courts.


Look, people have places to go and things to do. Either the little wotsit goes off the train or they're waiting ages for the cops to come. Take him to the next station and he just gives the cops the slip, that is if they are on the platform in time in the first place.
Reply 137
Original post by amime


I didn't say that they should be believed, I just think that they should have the opportunity to pay for the ticket when they have money available. Be that though a fine issued when they get to the station or through some other means :sexface:

All throwing people off that have no money does is gets people lost, meaning that they start hassling people an the street at night for train fare or asking randomers to borrow their phone to call help.


But he didn't have the money available - or he was arguing with the ticket inspector for no reason? I think if you get on a train you should have a ticket, not get taken to the final stop then waste time with police etc. getting them to pay for a ticket. You either get one or you don't do the journey, or you get kicked off.

You know why? Because if your system was allowed, people would try to test the system all the time - get on a train without a ticket in the knowledge that they may get a free ride, and at worst just be made to pay the fair at the end of the journey. I know people who used to do that on the journey from Durham to Newcastle (it's a 10min train journey), hoping they could get away with it, but if they did get caught they'd just pay the ticket.

If the policy is that you either have a ticket or you get kicked off at whichever station you're at then people will be more inclined to buy a ticket. This is becoming more widespread anyway what with the new ticket barriers that they are putting at so many stations across the country, you can barely get onto a station platform without a ticket now.
Reply 138
Original post by Hopple
Look, people have places to go and things to do. Either the little wotsit goes off the train or they're waiting ages for the cops to come. Take him to the next station and he just gives the cops the slip, that is if they are on the platform in time in the first place.


Linlithgow to Perth usually takes at least an hour apparently (more than enough time for them to get to the station).

You know what... you're right, I mean whats the point in calling the cops for anything? the criminal will probably just give them the slip anyway.
It's not like it's the BTP's job to deal with these things, they just get paid to sit there and look pretty. :rolleyes:
(edited 12 years ago)
Wow you liberal faggots really need to get a ****ing life! All this I've got human rights bull****!

We need discipline in schools, we need people to get off their ass and find a ****ing job. ( I'm not on about the people who're clearly looking for a job but I know plenty of people who choose not to work)

To bloody right the little ****er got kicked off the train, the little bastard should of just got off because he hasn't got a valid ticket. Did the 'Big Man' assault him, no he didn't! He just push/carried him off the train, it wasn't like it was some savage attack.

The reason this country is going wrong is because we have stupid little bastards on this forum, who seem to think that the boy on the train who hadn't paid a ticket was in the right! How?

****! This stuff really pisses me off.
(edited 12 years ago)

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending