talked alot of **** cant really remember what i wrote, cause i did bout 2pages lol.

WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK THE GRADE BOUNDRIES WILL BE

my guess 23- E
29 -D
36- C
41- B
47- A
47+ A*

(edited 12 years ago)

Reply 128

fiona23

OP

Original post by CMPUNK

talked alot of Sh*t cant really remember what i wrote, cause i did bout 2pages lol.

WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK THE GRADE BOUNDRIES WILL BE

my guess 23- E
29 -D
36- C
41- B
47- A
47+ A*

Yh I agree with you. Quite high :/ I wish it was 41 for an A like in 2010

Reply 129

CMPUNK

2

no doubt it was a harder paper than the mock we did ie jan 2011 and june 2010 i got like an A and B in those mocks but i think i got like a D in this
:frown:

sigh

Reply 130

owen1994

11

Grade depends on how generous markers are for Question 3.a. Since its hardly fair that people who did the first question get 9 marks for just the graph...

Reply 131

Tom_L

Original post by FDR

Didn't like the data response, thought the 8 marker was a bit weird, really liked the 15 and 20 markers (I did question two). Hopefully I will have done alright - Microeconomics isn't my strength (got a B in F581, but got 100 ums in F582)

I thought it was alright, but not the best. I quite liked the 8 mark question, but i wasnt too sure about the 5 marker.
i liked the 15 marker of question 2 but overall Q3 looked better for me so i did that one :smile:

Ah fair enough, im the otherway round i did better in F581 :smile:

Reply 132

darkshadow1111

14

What did people write about the example of a positive externality from new rail network.

I wrote- it will create jobs within society dunno if its right but oh well it was only two marks

Reply 133

owen1994

11

Original post by Tom_L

I thought it was alright, but not the best. I quite liked the 8 mark question, but i wasnt too sure about the 5 marker.
i liked the 15 marker of question 2 but overall Q3 looked better for me so i did that one :smile:

Ah fair enough, im the otherway round i did better in F581 :smile:

AS level was so easy because it was just theory and the mark schemes was so good that it was the only revision tool needed alongside the book. I got 87ums in first exam and 93ums in last exam so I am hoping that the trend can continue, but thats highly unlikely. There is a lot of uncertainty with these exams, personally I'll be pleased with a grade A because transport is quite tough.

Reply 134

CMPUNK

2

Original post by owen1994

AS level was so easy because it was just theory and the mark schemes was so good that it was the only revision tool needed alongside the book. I got 87ums in first exam and 93ums in last exam so I am hoping that the trend can continue, but thats highly unlikely. There is a lot of uncertainty with these exams, personally I'll be pleased with a grade A because transport is quite tough.

Owen, what did you write the second (4mark) question on paper please tell me :confused:

im going insane weather i lost 4 marks or not :O

Reply 135

wwelol

15

Original post by CMPUNK

talked alot of Sh*t cant really remember what i wrote, cause i did bout 2pages lol.

WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK THE GRADE BOUNDRIES WILL BE

my guess 23- E

29 -D
36- C
41- B
47- A
47+ A*

to high lad

Reply 136

wwelol

15

Original post by CMPUNK

Owen, what did you write the second (4mark) question on paper please tell me :confused:

im going insane weather i lost 4 marks or not :O

i wrote price increases for rail means less afordable
price of sub - decreased so they turn to cheaper option
wbu

Reply 137

wwelol

15

Original post by darkshadow1111

What did people write about the example of a positive externality from new rail network.

I wrote- it will create jobs within society dunno if its right but oh well it was only two marks

ohhh sick guy same here
i also wrote it will reduce congeston
just to be sure
the data response was hard

Reply 138

darkshadow1111

14

Original post by wwelol

ohhh sick guy same here
i also wrote it will reduce congeston
just to be sure
the data response was hard

oh thank god that was the only part of the whole paper i thought i messed up.
Hopefully i get an A :biggrin:

Reply 139

CMPUNK

2

Original post by wwelol

i wrote price increases for rail means less afordable
price of sub - decreased so they turn to cheaper option
wbu

DAMN, i think i did the opposite, do you remember the question by any chance? i swear it was something like state and explain two reasons why demand for rail travel would increase :confused:

damn 4 marks :frown:

F584 - OCR 23rd January 2012

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you