Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
x

Unlock these great extras with your FREE membership

  • One-on-one advice about results day and Clearing
  • Free access to our personal statement wizard
  • Customise TSR to suit how you want to use it

Weak-star topology - what is it?

Announcements Posted on
Had your SQA results? Find your uni forum to get talking to other applicants, existing students and your future course-mates 04-08-2015
Competition: win a karting session for you and seven mates! 24-07-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I'm doing an Ergodic Theory module, and the weak-star topology seems to be coming up a lot but I just can't seem to get my head around it.

    Here's how it's defined in the course: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~masdbl/erg...ture-first.pdf (page 6)

    Let X be a compact metric space... Let \mathcal{M} be the space of probability measures on X. We can consider the weak-star topology on \mathcal{M} corresponding to a sequence (\mu_n)\in\mathcal{M} converging to \mu\in\mathcal{M} (i.e. \mu_n\to\mu precisely when \int f d\mu_n \to \int f d\mu for every f\in C(X)
    Now here, I'm not entirely sure how they're using these sequences of measures to define a topology (I mean, what do the open sets look like?). So, I go and look it up on the internet and I get the definition below which is about functionals this time, rather than measures.

    Definition from http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/W...rTopology.html

    Let X be a locally convex topological vector space (over \mathbb{C} or \mathbb{R}) and let X^* be the set of continuous linear functionals on X (the continuous dual of X). If f\in X^* ... let p_x(f) denote the seminorm p_x(f)=|f(x)|. The topology on X^* defined by the seminorms \{p_x|x\in X\} is called the weak-* topology.
    So.. if we're considering these seminorms, would an open ball (centre f, radius delta) look something like \{ g \in X^* | \forall x \in X : p_x(g-f) < \delta \} = \left\{ g \in X^* \middle| \forall x \in X : |g(x)-f(x)| < \delta \right\}? I'm a bit confused here because I've only ever seen open balls for one particular norm on a set - not many different seminorms. Then presumably the topology would be generated by these open balls.

    So is anyone able to please explain what these definitions mean and how they're connected?
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ttoby)
    I'm doing an Ergodic Theory module, and the weak-star topology seems to be coming up a lot but I just can't seem to get my head around it.

    Here's how it's defined in the course: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~masdbl/erg...ture-first.pdf (page 6)



    Now here, I'm not entirely sure how they're using these sequences of measures to define a topology (I mean, what do the open sets look like?). So, I go and look it up on the internet and I get the definition below which is about functionals this time, rather than measures.

    Definition from http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/W...rTopology.html



    So.. if we're considering these seminorms, would an open ball (centre f, radius delta) look something like \{ g \in X^* | \forall x \in X : p_x(g-f) < \delta \} = \left\{ g \in X^* \middle| \forall x \in X : |g(x)-f(x)| < \delta \right\}? I'm a bit confused here because I've only ever seen open balls for one particular norm on a set - not many different seminorms. Then presumably the topology would be generated by these open balls.

    So is anyone able to please explain what these definitions mean and how they're connected?
    Okay I've read some stuff on wikipedia and now I'm going to hit you up with some (probably very) naive thoughts:

    On wiki the weak * topology on X is defined to be the coarsest one making all the functionals in X* continuous.

    Wiki

    In our case X is our measure space. SO if we assume (here's hoping) all our functionals on our measure space are

    \nu \mapsto \int f d\nu for f \in C[X]

    then the topology defined in the course is going to be the one that does this. I'm not sure how this works in with the planetmath definition but this is one way of thinking about the course definition in terms of functionals.
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    planetmath seems to be down, which sucks. I'm a bit confused because the planetmath definition is trying to define a topology on X*, when we're looking for a topology on X.
  4. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hathlan)
    Okay I've read some stuff on wikipedia and now I'm going to hit you up with some (probably very) naive thoughts:

    On wiki the weak * topology on X is defined to be the coarsest one making all the functionals in X* continuous.

    Wiki

    In our case X is our measure space. SO if we assume (here's hoping) all our functionals on our measure space are

    \nu \mapsto \int f d\nu for f \in C[X]

    then the topology defined in the course is going to be the one that does this. I'm not sure how this works in with the planetmath definition but this is one way of thinking about the course definition in terms of functionals.
    Thanks, yeah it helps to think of it like that. I won't worry about the planet math definition then.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: February 19, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Uni students: did you know what you wanted to do when you left school/college?
Results and Clearing

SQA results chat

Come talk about your results here

new on tsr

Indian? Join the society here

Take part in the chat and make friends

Study resources
x

Think you'll be in clearing or adjustment?

Hear direct from unis that want to talk to you

Get email alerts for university course places that match your subjects and grades. Just let us know what you're studying.

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.